Bunge Limited Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Bunge Limited cash flow-to-debt ratio. Bunge Limited (BG) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.05x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $1.34 Billion could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($27.11 Billion) in one year. Check BG cash reinvestment to operating cash ratio to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Bunge Limited (1999–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Bunge Limited from 1999 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Bunge Limited across 27 annual periods. Check BG cash flow quality score to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
Bunge Limited Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1999–2025)
Bunge Limited cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1999 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Bunge Limited. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Bunge Limited (BG) cash flow conversion.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.03x | $800.00 Million | $27.11 Billion | ▼ -78.3% |
| 2024 | 0.14x | $1.90 Billion | $13.95 Billion | ▼ -44.2% |
| 2023 | 0.24x | $3.31 Billion | $13.56 Billion | ▲ +164.3% |
| 2022 | -0.38x | $-5.55 Billion | $14.62 Billion | ▼ -104.8% |
| 2021 | -0.19x | $-2.89 Billion | $15.61 Billion | ▲ +10.7% |
| 2020 | -0.21x | $-3.54 Billion | $17.04 Billion | ▼ -203.2% |
| 2019 | -0.07x | $-814.00 Million | $11.89 Billion | ▲ +31.6% |
| 2018 | -0.10x | $-1.26 Billion | $12.62 Billion | ▲ +41.6% |
| 2017 | -0.17x | $-1.98 Billion | $11.51 Billion | ▼ -555.6% |
| 2016 | 0.04x | $446.00 Million | $11.85 Billion | ▼ -30.5% |
| 2015 | 0.05x | $610.00 Million | $11.26 Billion | ▼ -51.0% |
| 2014 | 0.11x | $1.40 Billion | $12.65 Billion | ▼ -17.2% |
| 2013 | 0.13x | $2.23 Billion | $16.66 Billion | ▲ +568.4% |
| 2012 | -0.03x | $-457.00 Million | $16.02 Billion | ▼ -114.3% |
| 2011 | 0.20x | $2.61 Billion | $13.15 Billion | ▲ +209.8% |
| 2010 | -0.18x | $-2.44 Billion | $13.45 Billion | ▼ -437.4% |
| 2009 | -0.03x | $-368.00 Million | $10.92 Billion | ▼ -117.0% |
| 2008 | 0.20x | $2.54 Billion | $12.79 Billion | ▲ +779.3% |
| 2007 | -0.03x | $-411.00 Million | $14.05 Billion | ▲ +16.3% |
| 2006 | -0.03x | $-289.00 Million | $8.27 Billion | ▼ -163.1% |
| 2005 | 0.06x | $382.00 Million | $6.89 Billion | ▼ -49.9% |
| 2004 | 0.11x | $802.00 Million | $7.25 Billion | ▲ +1975.4% |
| 2003 | -0.01x | $-41.00 Million | $6.95 Billion | ▼ -129.4% |
| 2002 | 0.02x | $128.00 Million | $6.38 Billion | ▼ -65.0% |
| 2001 | 0.06x | $205.00 Million | $3.57 Billion | ▲ +145.9% |
| 2000 | -0.12x | $-521.00 Million | $4.17 Billion | ▼ -1252.3% |
| 1999 | 0.01x | $37.00 Million | $3.41 Billion | — |