Enterprise Products Partners LP (EPD) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Enterprise Products Partners LP (EPD) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.05x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $2.47 Billion could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($47.41 Billion) in one year. Explore long-term investment intensity of Enterprise Products Partners LP to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Enterprise Products Partners LP Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1998–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Enterprise Products Partners LP across 28 annual periods. Also explore balance sheet size of Enterprise Products Partners LP for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Enterprise Products Partners LP (1998–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Enterprise Products Partners LP. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see market value of Enterprise Products Partners LP.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.18x | $8.59 Billion | $47.41 Billion | ▲ +6.2% |
| 2024 | 0.17x | $8.12 Billion | $47.58 Billion | ▼ -4.9% |
| 2023 | 0.18x | $7.57 Billion | $42.22 Billion | ▼ -9.9% |
| 2022 | 0.20x | $8.04 Billion | $40.41 Billion | ▼ -4.0% |
| 2021 | 0.21x | $8.51 Billion | $41.09 Billion | ▲ +36.2% |
| 2020 | 0.15x | $5.89 Billion | $38.73 Billion | ▼ -16.2% |
| 2019 | 0.18x | $6.52 Billion | $35.91 Billion | ▼ -3.1% |
| 2018 | 0.19x | $6.13 Billion | $32.68 Billion | ▲ +27.1% |
| 2017 | 0.15x | $4.67 Billion | $31.65 Billion | ▲ +8.5% |
| 2016 | 0.14x | $4.07 Billion | $29.93 Billion | ▼ -3.9% |
| 2015 | 0.14x | $4.00 Billion | $28.30 Billion | ▼ -6.5% |
| 2014 | 0.15x | $4.16 Billion | $27.51 Billion | ▼ -3.3% |
| 2013 | 0.16x | $3.87 Billion | $24.70 Billion | ▲ +22.6% |
| 2012 | 0.13x | $2.89 Billion | $22.64 Billion | ▼ -16.0% |
| 2011 | 0.15x | $3.33 Billion | $21.91 Billion | ▲ +28.6% |
| 2010 | 0.12x | $2.30 Billion | $19.46 Billion | ▼ -21.0% |
| 2009 | 0.15x | $2.41 Billion | $16.11 Billion | ▲ +42.4% |
| 2008 | 0.11x | $1.57 Billion | $14.92 Billion | ▼ -33.7% |
| 2007 | 0.16x | $1.59 Billion | $10.05 Billion | ▼ -0.5% |
| 2006 | 0.16x | $1.18 Billion | $7.38 Billion | ▲ +71.6% |
| 2005 | 0.09x | $631.71 Million | $6.81 Billion | ▲ +44.7% |
| 2004 | 0.06x | $379.24 Million | $5.92 Billion | ▼ -54.6% |
| 2003 | 0.14x | $424.70 Million | $3.01 Billion | ▲ +26.7% |
| 2002 | 0.11x | $329.76 Million | $2.96 Billion | ▼ -50.2% |
| 2001 | 0.22x | $283.33 Million | $1.27 Billion | ▼ -37.6% |
| 2000 | 0.36x | $360.69 Million | $1.01 Billion | ▲ +48.2% |
| 1999 | 0.24x | $168.80 Million | $697.40 Million | ▲ +306.0% |
| 1998 | -0.12x | $-20.30 Million | $172.80 Million | — |