Greif Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Greif Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Greif Inc (GEF-B) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.05x as of January 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $116.60 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($2.52 Billion) in one year. Check total reinvestment intensity of Greif Inc to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Greif Inc (1994–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Greif Inc from 1994 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Greif Inc across 32 annual periods. Check Greif Inc cash earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
Greif Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1994–2025)
Greif Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1994 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Greif Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see GEF-B operating cash flow.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.02x | $58.60 Million | $2.72 Billion | ▼ -73.4% |
| 2024 | 0.08x | $356.00 Million | $4.40 Billion | ▼ -52.1% |
| 2023 | 0.17x | $649.50 Million | $3.85 Billion | ▼ -6.1% |
| 2022 | 0.18x | $657.50 Million | $3.66 Billion | ▲ +91.3% |
| 2021 | 0.09x | $396.00 Million | $4.22 Billion | ▼ -11.4% |
| 2020 | 0.11x | $454.70 Million | $4.29 Billion | ▲ +14.7% |
| 2019 | 0.09x | $389.50 Million | $4.21 Billion | ▼ -26.8% |
| 2018 | 0.13x | $253.00 Million | $2.01 Billion | ▼ -10.9% |
| 2017 | 0.14x | $305.00 Million | $2.15 Billion | ▲ +2.8% |
| 2016 | 0.14x | $301.00 Million | $2.18 Billion | ▲ +50.7% |
| 2015 | 0.09x | $206.30 Million | $2.26 Billion | ▼ -14.6% |
| 2014 | 0.11x | $261.80 Million | $2.44 Billion | ▲ +6.3% |
| 2013 | 0.10x | $250.30 Million | $2.48 Billion | ▼ -46.0% |
| 2012 | 0.19x | $473.50 Million | $2.54 Billion | ▲ +205.0% |
| 2011 | 0.06x | $172.30 Million | $2.82 Billion | ▼ -27.3% |
| 2010 | 0.08x | $178.11 Million | $2.11 Billion | ▼ -45.7% |
| 2009 | 0.16x | $266.52 Million | $1.72 Billion | ▲ +87.2% |
| 2008 | 0.08x | $139.84 Million | $1.69 Billion | ▼ -64.8% |
| 2007 | 0.24x | $388.24 Million | $1.65 Billion | ▲ +37.8% |
| 2006 | 0.17x | $229.11 Million | $1.34 Billion | ▲ +4.5% |
| 2005 | 0.16x | $188.38 Million | $1.15 Billion | ▼ -18.1% |
| 2004 | 0.20x | $236.24 Million | $1.18 Billion | ▲ +152.9% |
| 2003 | 0.08x | $99.30 Million | $1.26 Billion | ▼ -36.2% |
| 2002 | 0.12x | $147.03 Million | $1.19 Billion | ▲ +48.9% |
| 2001 | 0.08x | $98.86 Million | $1.19 Billion | ▼ -71.9% |
| 2000 | 0.30x | $117.23 Million | $396.82 Million | ▲ +74.1% |
| 1999 | 0.17x | $71.77 Million | $423.00 Million | ▼ -9.0% |
| 1998 | 0.19x | $76.90 Million | $412.50 Million | ▼ -30.3% |
| 1997 | 0.27x | $40.10 Million | $150.00 Million | ▼ -63.5% |
| 1996 | 0.73x | $81.90 Million | $111.70 Million | ▼ -18.6% |
| 1995 | 0.90x | $85.80 Million | $95.20 Million | ▲ +72.8% |
| 1994 | 0.52x | $48.05 Million | $92.14 Million | — |