Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated (JLL) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated (JLL) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.05x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $498.10 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($9.86 Billion) in one year. See JLL financial flexibility index to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated across 30 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated (JLL) cash conversion ratio.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated (1996–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated. Check Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated cash earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.12x | $1.19 Billion | $10.18 Billion | ▲ +47.4% |
| 2024 | 0.08x | $785.30 Million | $9.87 Billion | ▲ +33.4% |
| 2023 | 0.06x | $575.80 Million | $9.65 Billion | ▲ +181.8% |
| 2022 | 0.02x | $199.90 Million | $9.44 Billion | ▼ -80.2% |
| 2021 | 0.11x | $972.40 Million | $9.08 Billion | ▼ -16.5% |
| 2020 | 0.13x | $1.11 Billion | $8.70 Billion | ▲ +124.1% |
| 2019 | 0.06x | $483.80 Million | $8.46 Billion | ▼ -40.4% |
| 2018 | 0.10x | $604.10 Million | $6.29 Billion | ▼ -42.5% |
| 2017 | 0.17x | $789.20 Million | $4.73 Billion | ▲ +274.0% |
| 2016 | 0.04x | $214.50 Million | $4.81 Billion | ▼ -59.0% |
| 2015 | 0.11x | $375.80 Million | $3.46 Billion | ▼ -42.2% |
| 2014 | 0.19x | $498.90 Million | $2.65 Billion | ▲ +54.4% |
| 2013 | 0.12x | $293.17 Million | $2.41 Billion | ▼ -11.1% |
| 2012 | 0.14x | $327.70 Million | $2.39 Billion | ▲ +45.1% |
| 2011 | 0.09x | $211.34 Million | $2.24 Billion | ▼ -56.3% |
| 2010 | 0.22x | $384.27 Million | $1.78 Billion | ▲ +47.9% |
| 2009 | 0.15x | $250.55 Million | $1.71 Billion | ▲ +778.4% |
| 2008 | 0.02x | $33.37 Million | $2.01 Billion | ▼ -94.8% |
| 2007 | 0.32x | $409.42 Million | $1.27 Billion | ▼ -16.6% |
| 2006 | 0.39x | $377.70 Million | $979.57 Million | ▲ +94.6% |
| 2005 | 0.20x | $120.64 Million | $608.77 Million | ▼ -38.1% |
| 2004 | 0.32x | $161.48 Million | $504.40 Million | ▲ +48.9% |
| 2003 | 0.21x | $110.05 Million | $511.95 Million | ▲ +52.7% |
| 2002 | 0.14x | $68.37 Million | $485.56 Million | ▲ +35.5% |
| 2001 | 0.10x | $54.10 Million | $520.56 Million | ▼ -57.0% |
| 2000 | 0.24x | $140.34 Million | $581.14 Million | ▲ +895.3% |
| 1999 | -0.03x | $-18.23 Million | $600.27 Million | ▼ -150.7% |
| 1998 | 0.06x | $19.24 Million | $321.35 Million | ▼ -89.2% |
| 1997 | 0.56x | $40.58 Million | $72.99 Million | ▲ +427.0% |
| 1996 | 0.11x | $13.96 Million | $132.37 Million | — |