Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated cash flow-to-debt ratio. Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated (JLL) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.05x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $498.10 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($9.86 Billion) in one year. Check JLL cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated (1996–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated from 1996 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated across 30 annual periods. Check Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated (JLL) reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1996–2025)
Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1996 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see how efficiently does Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated generate cash.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.12x | $1.19 Billion | $10.18 Billion | ▲ +47.4% |
| 2024 | 0.08x | $785.30 Million | $9.87 Billion | ▲ +33.4% |
| 2023 | 0.06x | $575.80 Million | $9.65 Billion | ▲ +181.8% |
| 2022 | 0.02x | $199.90 Million | $9.44 Billion | ▼ -80.2% |
| 2021 | 0.11x | $972.40 Million | $9.08 Billion | ▼ -16.5% |
| 2020 | 0.13x | $1.11 Billion | $8.70 Billion | ▲ +124.1% |
| 2019 | 0.06x | $483.80 Million | $8.46 Billion | ▼ -40.4% |
| 2018 | 0.10x | $604.10 Million | $6.29 Billion | ▼ -42.5% |
| 2017 | 0.17x | $789.20 Million | $4.73 Billion | ▲ +274.0% |
| 2016 | 0.04x | $214.50 Million | $4.81 Billion | ▼ -59.0% |
| 2015 | 0.11x | $375.80 Million | $3.46 Billion | ▼ -42.2% |
| 2014 | 0.19x | $498.90 Million | $2.65 Billion | ▲ +54.4% |
| 2013 | 0.12x | $293.17 Million | $2.41 Billion | ▼ -11.1% |
| 2012 | 0.14x | $327.70 Million | $2.39 Billion | ▲ +45.1% |
| 2011 | 0.09x | $211.34 Million | $2.24 Billion | ▼ -56.3% |
| 2010 | 0.22x | $384.27 Million | $1.78 Billion | ▲ +47.9% |
| 2009 | 0.15x | $250.55 Million | $1.71 Billion | ▲ +778.4% |
| 2008 | 0.02x | $33.37 Million | $2.01 Billion | ▼ -94.8% |
| 2007 | 0.32x | $409.42 Million | $1.27 Billion | ▼ -16.6% |
| 2006 | 0.39x | $377.70 Million | $979.57 Million | ▲ +94.6% |
| 2005 | 0.20x | $120.64 Million | $608.77 Million | ▼ -38.1% |
| 2004 | 0.32x | $161.48 Million | $504.40 Million | ▲ +48.9% |
| 2003 | 0.21x | $110.05 Million | $511.95 Million | ▲ +52.7% |
| 2002 | 0.14x | $68.37 Million | $485.56 Million | ▲ +35.5% |
| 2001 | 0.10x | $54.10 Million | $520.56 Million | ▼ -57.0% |
| 2000 | 0.24x | $140.34 Million | $581.14 Million | ▲ +895.3% |
| 1999 | -0.03x | $-18.23 Million | $600.27 Million | ▼ -150.7% |
| 1998 | 0.06x | $19.24 Million | $321.35 Million | ▼ -89.2% |
| 1997 | 0.56x | $40.58 Million | $72.99 Million | ▲ +427.0% |
| 1996 | 0.11x | $13.96 Million | $132.37 Million | — |