Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated (JLL) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated (JLL) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.07x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-755.00 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($10.46 Billion) in one year. Explore Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated (JLL) investment intensity to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated across 30 annual periods. Also explore JLL asset base for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated (1996–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see JLL stock market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.12x | $1.19 Billion | $10.18 Billion | ▲ +47.4% |
| 2024 | 0.08x | $785.30 Million | $9.87 Billion | ▲ +33.4% |
| 2023 | 0.06x | $575.80 Million | $9.65 Billion | ▲ +181.8% |
| 2022 | 0.02x | $199.90 Million | $9.44 Billion | ▼ -80.2% |
| 2021 | 0.11x | $972.40 Million | $9.08 Billion | ▼ -16.5% |
| 2020 | 0.13x | $1.11 Billion | $8.70 Billion | ▲ +124.1% |
| 2019 | 0.06x | $483.80 Million | $8.46 Billion | ▼ -40.4% |
| 2018 | 0.10x | $604.10 Million | $6.29 Billion | ▼ -42.5% |
| 2017 | 0.17x | $789.20 Million | $4.73 Billion | ▲ +274.0% |
| 2016 | 0.04x | $214.50 Million | $4.81 Billion | ▼ -59.0% |
| 2015 | 0.11x | $375.80 Million | $3.46 Billion | ▼ -42.2% |
| 2014 | 0.19x | $498.90 Million | $2.65 Billion | ▲ +54.4% |
| 2013 | 0.12x | $293.17 Million | $2.41 Billion | ▼ -11.1% |
| 2012 | 0.14x | $327.70 Million | $2.39 Billion | ▲ +45.1% |
| 2011 | 0.09x | $211.34 Million | $2.24 Billion | ▼ -56.3% |
| 2010 | 0.22x | $384.27 Million | $1.78 Billion | ▲ +47.9% |
| 2009 | 0.15x | $250.55 Million | $1.71 Billion | ▲ +778.4% |
| 2008 | 0.02x | $33.37 Million | $2.01 Billion | ▼ -94.8% |
| 2007 | 0.32x | $409.42 Million | $1.27 Billion | ▼ -16.6% |
| 2006 | 0.39x | $377.70 Million | $979.57 Million | ▲ +94.6% |
| 2005 | 0.20x | $120.64 Million | $608.77 Million | ▼ -38.1% |
| 2004 | 0.32x | $161.48 Million | $504.40 Million | ▲ +48.9% |
| 2003 | 0.21x | $110.05 Million | $511.95 Million | ▲ +52.7% |
| 2002 | 0.14x | $68.37 Million | $485.56 Million | ▲ +35.5% |
| 2001 | 0.10x | $54.10 Million | $520.56 Million | ▼ -57.0% |
| 2000 | 0.24x | $140.34 Million | $581.14 Million | ▲ +895.3% |
| 1999 | -0.03x | $-18.23 Million | $600.27 Million | ▼ -150.7% |
| 1998 | 0.06x | $19.24 Million | $321.35 Million | ▼ -89.2% |
| 1997 | 0.56x | $40.58 Million | $72.99 Million | ▲ +427.0% |
| 1996 | 0.11x | $13.96 Million | $132.37 Million | — |