Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated (JLL) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated (JLL) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.07x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-755.00 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($10.46 Billion) in one year. See JLL free cash flow to operating cash ratio to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated across 30 annual periods. Also explore net asset momentum of Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated (1996–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see JLL company net worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.12x | $1.19 Billion | $10.18 Billion | ▲ +47.4% |
| 2024 | 0.08x | $785.30 Million | $9.87 Billion | ▲ +33.4% |
| 2023 | 0.06x | $575.80 Million | $9.65 Billion | ▲ +181.8% |
| 2022 | 0.02x | $199.90 Million | $9.44 Billion | ▼ -80.2% |
| 2021 | 0.11x | $972.40 Million | $9.08 Billion | ▼ -16.5% |
| 2020 | 0.13x | $1.11 Billion | $8.70 Billion | ▲ +124.1% |
| 2019 | 0.06x | $483.80 Million | $8.46 Billion | ▼ -40.4% |
| 2018 | 0.10x | $604.10 Million | $6.29 Billion | ▼ -42.5% |
| 2017 | 0.17x | $789.20 Million | $4.73 Billion | ▲ +274.0% |
| 2016 | 0.04x | $214.50 Million | $4.81 Billion | ▼ -59.0% |
| 2015 | 0.11x | $375.80 Million | $3.46 Billion | ▼ -42.2% |
| 2014 | 0.19x | $498.90 Million | $2.65 Billion | ▲ +54.4% |
| 2013 | 0.12x | $293.17 Million | $2.41 Billion | ▼ -11.1% |
| 2012 | 0.14x | $327.70 Million | $2.39 Billion | ▲ +45.1% |
| 2011 | 0.09x | $211.34 Million | $2.24 Billion | ▼ -56.3% |
| 2010 | 0.22x | $384.27 Million | $1.78 Billion | ▲ +47.9% |
| 2009 | 0.15x | $250.55 Million | $1.71 Billion | ▲ +778.4% |
| 2008 | 0.02x | $33.37 Million | $2.01 Billion | ▼ -94.8% |
| 2007 | 0.32x | $409.42 Million | $1.27 Billion | ▼ -16.6% |
| 2006 | 0.39x | $377.70 Million | $979.57 Million | ▲ +94.6% |
| 2005 | 0.20x | $120.64 Million | $608.77 Million | ▼ -38.1% |
| 2004 | 0.32x | $161.48 Million | $504.40 Million | ▲ +48.9% |
| 2003 | 0.21x | $110.05 Million | $511.95 Million | ▲ +52.7% |
| 2002 | 0.14x | $68.37 Million | $485.56 Million | ▲ +35.5% |
| 2001 | 0.10x | $54.10 Million | $520.56 Million | ▼ -57.0% |
| 2000 | 0.24x | $140.34 Million | $581.14 Million | ▲ +895.3% |
| 1999 | -0.03x | $-18.23 Million | $600.27 Million | ▼ -150.7% |
| 1998 | 0.06x | $19.24 Million | $321.35 Million | ▼ -89.2% |
| 1997 | 0.56x | $40.58 Million | $72.99 Million | ▲ +427.0% |
| 1996 | 0.11x | $13.96 Million | $132.37 Million | — |