Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.05x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $708.00 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($15.56 Billion) in one year. See free cash flow generation of Kimberly-Clark Corporation to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Kimberly-Clark Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1989–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Kimberly-Clark Corporation across 36 annual periods. Also explore Kimberly-Clark Corporation equity growth rate to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Kimberly-Clark Corporation (1989–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Kimberly-Clark Corporation. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see KMB stock market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.21x | $3.23 Billion | $15.57 Billion | ▼ -4.6% |
| 2023 | 0.22x | $3.54 Billion | $16.28 Billion | ▲ +37.5% |
| 2022 | 0.16x | $2.73 Billion | $17.27 Billion | ▼ -0.9% |
| 2021 | 0.16x | $2.73 Billion | $17.10 Billion | ▼ -28.7% |
| 2020 | 0.22x | $3.73 Billion | $16.65 Billion | ▲ +23.5% |
| 2019 | 0.18x | $2.74 Billion | $15.09 Billion | ▼ -11.1% |
| 2018 | 0.20x | $2.97 Billion | $14.56 Billion | ▼ -0.7% |
| 2017 | 0.21x | $2.93 Billion | $14.27 Billion | ▼ -8.0% |
| 2016 | 0.22x | $3.23 Billion | $14.48 Billion | ▲ +43.2% |
| 2015 | 0.16x | $2.31 Billion | $14.80 Billion | ▼ -20.5% |
| 2014 | 0.20x | $2.85 Billion | $14.53 Billion | ▼ -11.2% |
| 2013 | 0.22x | $3.04 Billion | $13.78 Billion | ▼ -2.1% |
| 2012 | 0.23x | $3.29 Billion | $14.59 Billion | ▲ +36.4% |
| 2011 | 0.17x | $2.29 Billion | $13.84 Billion | ▼ -17.7% |
| 2010 | 0.20x | $2.74 Billion | $13.66 Billion | ▼ -22.0% |
| 2009 | 0.26x | $3.48 Billion | $13.52 Billion | ▲ +41.3% |
| 2008 | 0.18x | $2.52 Billion | $13.81 Billion | ▼ -4.5% |
| 2007 | 0.19x | $2.43 Billion | $12.73 Billion | ▼ -22.0% |
| 2006 | 0.24x | $2.58 Billion | $10.55 Billion | ▲ +9.5% |
| 2005 | 0.22x | $2.31 Billion | $10.35 Billion | ▼ -24.6% |
| 2004 | 0.30x | $2.97 Billion | $10.02 Billion | ▲ +10.2% |
| 2003 | 0.27x | $2.61 Billion | $9.72 Billion | ▲ +8.0% |
| 2002 | 0.25x | $2.42 Billion | $9.73 Billion | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2001 | 0.25x | $2.25 Billion | $9.05 Billion | ▼ -1.6% |
| 2000 | 0.25x | $2.13 Billion | $8.43 Billion | ▼ -11.4% |
| 1999 | 0.29x | $2.13 Billion | $7.48 Billion | ▲ +6.8% |
| 1998 | 0.27x | $1.99 Billion | $7.45 Billion | ▲ +32.5% |
| 1997 | 0.20x | $1.41 Billion | $6.98 Billion | ▼ -14.3% |
| 1996 | 0.24x | $1.67 Billion | $7.11 Billion | ▲ +90.8% |
| 1995 | 0.12x | $931.60 Million | $7.55 Billion | ▼ -25.5% |
| 1994 | 0.17x | $669.00 Million | $4.04 Billion | ▼ -14.5% |
| 1993 | 0.19x | $746.70 Million | $3.86 Billion | ▼ -10.1% |
| 1992 | 0.22x | $814.50 Million | $3.78 Billion | ▼ -10.0% |
| 1991 | 0.24x | $737.10 Million | $3.08 Billion | ▼ -3.2% |
| 1990 | 0.25x | $736.80 Million | $2.98 Billion | ▼ -11.4% |
| 1989 | 0.28x | $762.60 Million | $2.73 Billion | — |