Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) — Strategic Asset Allocation Index
Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) has a Strategic Asset Allocation Index of 25.6% as of June 2025. Strategic assets (PP&E of $- plus long-term investments of $359.00 Million) total $359.00 Million, measured against net assets of $1.40 Billion. A higher index reflects capital-intensive or investment-heavy strategies where strategic assets dominate the equity base.
SAAI
Strategic Assets
PP&E
Net Assets
Kimberly-Clark Corporation Strategic Asset Allocation Index (2000–2024)
This chart shows how Kimberly-Clark Corporation's Strategic Asset Allocation Index has evolved across 24 annual periods from 2000 to 2024. As of June 2025, the index stands at 25.6%, representing strategic assets of $359.00 Million against net assets of $1.40 Billion USD. Explore KMB cash flow conversion to assess how effectively this company generates cash.
Annual Strategic Asset Allocation Index for Kimberly-Clark Corporation (2000–2024)
The table below presents the year-by-year Strategic Asset Allocation Index for Kimberly-Clark Corporation from 2000 to 2024, covering 24 annual filings. Each row shows PP&E, long-term investments, strategic assets combined, net assets, the index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For the full company profile including market capitalisation, see KMB market cap overview.
| Year | SAAI | Strategic Assets (USD) | PP&E | LT Investments | Net Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 32.2% | $314.00 Million | $- | $314.00 Million | $975.00 Million | ▲ +3.6 pp |
| 2023 | 28.7% | $306.00 Million | $- | $306.00 Million | $1.07 Billion | ▼ -1131.8 pp |
| 2022 | 1160.4% | $8.12 Billion | $7.88 Billion | $238.00 Million | $700.00 Million | ▲ +22.4 pp |
| 2021 | 1138.0% | $8.39 Billion | $8.10 Billion | $290.00 Million | $737.00 Million | ▲ +115.9 pp |
| 2020 | 1022.1% | $8.88 Billion | $8.58 Billion | $300.00 Million | $869.00 Million | ▼ -2956.3 pp |
| 2019 | 3978.4% | $7.72 Billion | $7.45 Billion | $268.00 Million | $194.00 Million | ▲ +3108.8 pp |
| 2017 | 869.5% | $7.67 Billion | $7.44 Billion | $233.00 Million | $882.00 Million | ▼ -5477.5 pp |
| 2016 | 6347.0% | $7.43 Billion | $7.17 Billion | $257.00 Million | $117.00 Million | ▼ -12030.5 pp |
| 2015 | 18377.5% | $7.35 Billion | $7.10 Billion | $247.00 Million | $40.00 Million | ▲ +17615.1 pp |
| 2014 | 762.4% | $7.62 Billion | $7.36 Billion | $257.00 Million | $999.00 Million | ▲ +600.3 pp |
| 2013 | 162.1% | $8.33 Billion | $7.95 Billion | $382.00 Million | $5.14 Billion | ▼ -5.2 pp |
| 2012 | 167.3% | $8.85 Billion | $8.10 Billion | $750.00 Million | $5.29 Billion | ▲ +21.7 pp |
| 2011 | 145.6% | $8.05 Billion | $8.05 Billion | $- | $5.53 Billion | ▼ -1.5 pp |
| 2010 | 147.1% | $9.12 Billion | $8.36 Billion | $767.00 Million | $6.20 Billion | ▲ +5.9 pp |
| 2009 | 141.2% | $8.03 Billion | $8.03 Billion | $- | $5.69 Billion | ▼ -37.9 pp |
| 2008 | 179.1% | $7.67 Billion | $7.67 Billion | $- | $4.28 Billion | ▲ +37.2 pp |
| 2007 | 141.8% | $8.09 Billion | $8.09 Billion | $- | $5.71 Billion | ▲ +23.9 pp |
| 2006 | 117.9% | $7.68 Billion | $7.68 Billion | $- | $6.52 Billion | ▼ -8.0 pp |
| 2005 | 125.9% | $7.49 Billion | $7.49 Billion | $- | $5.95 Billion | ▲ +11.7 pp |
| 2004 | 114.2% | $7.99 Billion | $7.99 Billion | $- | $7.00 Billion | ▼ -2.8 pp |
| 2003 | 117.0% | $8.26 Billion | $8.26 Billion | $- | $7.06 Billion | ▼ -13.2 pp |
| 2002 | 130.2% | $7.62 Billion | $7.62 Billion | $- | $5.85 Billion | ▲ +7.2 pp |
| 2001 | 123.0% | $7.33 Billion | $7.33 Billion | $- | $5.96 Billion | ▲ +8.6 pp |
| 2000 | 114.4% | $6.92 Billion | $6.92 Billion | $- | $6.05 Billion | — |