Lear Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Lear Corporation cash flow-to-debt ratio. Lear Corporation (LEA) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.04x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $460.50 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($10.33 Billion) in one year. Check how high is Lear Corporation's earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Lear Corporation (1993–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Lear Corporation from 1993 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Lear Corporation across 33 annual periods. Check cash flow reinvestment rate of Lear Corporation to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Lear Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1993–2025)
Lear Corporation cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1993 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Lear Corporation. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see LEA cash flow conversion.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.11x | $1.09 Billion | $9.64 Billion | ▼ -5.0% |
| 2024 | 0.12x | $1.12 Billion | $9.43 Billion | ▼ -8.4% |
| 2023 | 0.13x | $1.25 Billion | $9.63 Billion | ▲ +13.4% |
| 2022 | 0.11x | $1.02 Billion | $8.93 Billion | ▲ +45.8% |
| 2021 | 0.08x | $670.10 Million | $8.54 Billion | ▲ +1.5% |
| 2020 | 0.08x | $663.10 Million | $8.58 Billion | ▼ -51.5% |
| 2019 | 0.16x | $1.28 Billion | $8.06 Billion | ▼ -36.6% |
| 2018 | 0.25x | $1.78 Billion | $7.08 Billion | ▲ +5.7% |
| 2017 | 0.24x | $1.78 Billion | $7.50 Billion | ▼ -1.5% |
| 2016 | 0.24x | $1.62 Billion | $6.71 Billion | ▲ +21.3% |
| 2015 | 0.20x | $1.27 Billion | $6.39 Billion | ▲ +31.3% |
| 2014 | 0.15x | $927.80 Million | $6.12 Billion | ▼ -4.2% |
| 2013 | 0.16x | $820.10 Million | $5.18 Billion | ▼ -0.6% |
| 2012 | 0.16x | $729.80 Million | $4.58 Billion | ▼ -10.3% |
| 2011 | 0.18x | $790.30 Million | $4.45 Billion | ▲ +15.7% |
| 2010 | 0.15x | $621.90 Million | $4.05 Billion | ▲ +440.9% |
| 2009 | -0.05x | $-175.20 Million | $3.89 Billion | ▼ -308.4% |
| 2008 | 0.02x | $144.20 Million | $6.67 Billion | ▼ -69.0% |
| 2007 | 0.07x | $466.90 Million | $6.71 Billion | ▲ +76.8% |
| 2006 | 0.04x | $285.30 Million | $7.25 Billion | ▼ -49.6% |
| 2005 | 0.08x | $560.80 Million | $7.18 Billion | ▼ -16.6% |
| 2004 | 0.09x | $675.90 Million | $7.21 Billion | ▲ +0.9% |
| 2003 | 0.09x | $586.30 Million | $6.31 Billion | ▼ -0.8% |
| 2002 | 0.09x | $545.10 Million | $5.82 Billion | ▼ -32.1% |
| 2001 | 0.14x | $829.80 Million | $6.02 Billion | ▲ +24.0% |
| 2000 | 0.11x | $753.10 Million | $6.77 Billion | ▲ +43.9% |
| 1999 | 0.08x | $560.30 Million | $7.25 Billion | ▲ +18.5% |
| 1998 | 0.07x | $285.40 Million | $4.38 Billion | ▼ -52.8% |
| 1997 | 0.14x | $449.40 Million | $3.25 Billion | ▼ -16.4% |
| 1996 | 0.17x | $462.60 Million | $2.80 Billion | ▲ +204.8% |
| 1995 | 0.05x | $134.60 Million | $2.48 Billion | ▼ -47.7% |
| 1994 | 0.10x | $155.70 Million | $1.50 Billion | ▼ -2.0% |
| 1993 | 0.11x | $113.30 Million | $1.07 Billion | — |