Lear Corporation (LEA) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Lear Corporation (LEA) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.01x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $98.10 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($10.18 Billion) in one year. See LEA free cash flow generation to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Lear Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1993–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Lear Corporation across 33 annual periods. Also explore LEA year-over-year net asset growth to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Lear Corporation (1993–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Lear Corporation. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see how much is Lear Corporation worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.11x | $1.09 Billion | $9.64 Billion | ▼ -5.0% |
| 2024 | 0.12x | $1.12 Billion | $9.43 Billion | ▼ -8.4% |
| 2023 | 0.13x | $1.25 Billion | $9.63 Billion | ▲ +13.4% |
| 2022 | 0.11x | $1.02 Billion | $8.93 Billion | ▲ +45.8% |
| 2021 | 0.08x | $670.10 Million | $8.54 Billion | ▲ +1.5% |
| 2020 | 0.08x | $663.10 Million | $8.58 Billion | ▼ -51.5% |
| 2019 | 0.16x | $1.28 Billion | $8.06 Billion | ▼ -36.6% |
| 2018 | 0.25x | $1.78 Billion | $7.08 Billion | ▲ +5.7% |
| 2017 | 0.24x | $1.78 Billion | $7.50 Billion | ▼ -1.5% |
| 2016 | 0.24x | $1.62 Billion | $6.71 Billion | ▲ +21.3% |
| 2015 | 0.20x | $1.27 Billion | $6.39 Billion | ▲ +31.3% |
| 2014 | 0.15x | $927.80 Million | $6.12 Billion | ▼ -4.2% |
| 2013 | 0.16x | $820.10 Million | $5.18 Billion | ▼ -0.6% |
| 2012 | 0.16x | $729.80 Million | $4.58 Billion | ▼ -10.3% |
| 2011 | 0.18x | $790.30 Million | $4.45 Billion | ▲ +15.7% |
| 2010 | 0.15x | $621.90 Million | $4.05 Billion | ▲ +440.9% |
| 2009 | -0.05x | $-175.20 Million | $3.89 Billion | ▼ -308.4% |
| 2008 | 0.02x | $144.20 Million | $6.67 Billion | ▼ -69.0% |
| 2007 | 0.07x | $466.90 Million | $6.71 Billion | ▲ +76.8% |
| 2006 | 0.04x | $285.30 Million | $7.25 Billion | ▼ -49.6% |
| 2005 | 0.08x | $560.80 Million | $7.18 Billion | ▼ -16.6% |
| 2004 | 0.09x | $675.90 Million | $7.21 Billion | ▲ +0.9% |
| 2003 | 0.09x | $586.30 Million | $6.31 Billion | ▼ -0.8% |
| 2002 | 0.09x | $545.10 Million | $5.82 Billion | ▼ -32.1% |
| 2001 | 0.14x | $829.80 Million | $6.02 Billion | ▲ +24.0% |
| 2000 | 0.11x | $753.10 Million | $6.77 Billion | ▲ +43.9% |
| 1999 | 0.08x | $560.30 Million | $7.25 Billion | ▲ +18.5% |
| 1998 | 0.07x | $285.40 Million | $4.38 Billion | ▼ -52.8% |
| 1997 | 0.14x | $449.40 Million | $3.25 Billion | ▼ -16.4% |
| 1996 | 0.17x | $462.60 Million | $2.80 Billion | ▲ +204.8% |
| 1995 | 0.05x | $134.60 Million | $2.48 Billion | ▼ -47.7% |
| 1994 | 0.10x | $155.70 Million | $1.50 Billion | ▼ -2.0% |
| 1993 | 0.11x | $113.30 Million | $1.07 Billion | — |