Lear Corporation (LEA) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Lear Corporation (LEA) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.01x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $98.10 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($10.18 Billion) in one year. Explore long-term investment intensity of Lear Corporation to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Lear Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1993–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Lear Corporation across 33 annual periods. Also explore Lear Corporation (LEA) total assets for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Lear Corporation (1993–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Lear Corporation. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see how much is Lear Corporation worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.11x | $1.09 Billion | $9.64 Billion | ▼ -5.0% |
| 2024 | 0.12x | $1.12 Billion | $9.43 Billion | ▼ -8.4% |
| 2023 | 0.13x | $1.25 Billion | $9.63 Billion | ▲ +13.4% |
| 2022 | 0.11x | $1.02 Billion | $8.93 Billion | ▲ +45.8% |
| 2021 | 0.08x | $670.10 Million | $8.54 Billion | ▲ +1.5% |
| 2020 | 0.08x | $663.10 Million | $8.58 Billion | ▼ -51.5% |
| 2019 | 0.16x | $1.28 Billion | $8.06 Billion | ▼ -36.6% |
| 2018 | 0.25x | $1.78 Billion | $7.08 Billion | ▲ +5.7% |
| 2017 | 0.24x | $1.78 Billion | $7.50 Billion | ▼ -1.5% |
| 2016 | 0.24x | $1.62 Billion | $6.71 Billion | ▲ +21.3% |
| 2015 | 0.20x | $1.27 Billion | $6.39 Billion | ▲ +31.3% |
| 2014 | 0.15x | $927.80 Million | $6.12 Billion | ▼ -4.2% |
| 2013 | 0.16x | $820.10 Million | $5.18 Billion | ▼ -0.6% |
| 2012 | 0.16x | $729.80 Million | $4.58 Billion | ▼ -10.3% |
| 2011 | 0.18x | $790.30 Million | $4.45 Billion | ▲ +15.7% |
| 2010 | 0.15x | $621.90 Million | $4.05 Billion | ▲ +440.9% |
| 2009 | -0.05x | $-175.20 Million | $3.89 Billion | ▼ -308.4% |
| 2008 | 0.02x | $144.20 Million | $6.67 Billion | ▼ -69.0% |
| 2007 | 0.07x | $466.90 Million | $6.71 Billion | ▲ +76.8% |
| 2006 | 0.04x | $285.30 Million | $7.25 Billion | ▼ -49.6% |
| 2005 | 0.08x | $560.80 Million | $7.18 Billion | ▼ -16.6% |
| 2004 | 0.09x | $675.90 Million | $7.21 Billion | ▲ +0.9% |
| 2003 | 0.09x | $586.30 Million | $6.31 Billion | ▼ -0.8% |
| 2002 | 0.09x | $545.10 Million | $5.82 Billion | ▼ -32.1% |
| 2001 | 0.14x | $829.80 Million | $6.02 Billion | ▲ +24.0% |
| 2000 | 0.11x | $753.10 Million | $6.77 Billion | ▲ +43.9% |
| 1999 | 0.08x | $560.30 Million | $7.25 Billion | ▲ +18.5% |
| 1998 | 0.07x | $285.40 Million | $4.38 Billion | ▼ -52.8% |
| 1997 | 0.14x | $449.40 Million | $3.25 Billion | ▼ -16.4% |
| 1996 | 0.17x | $462.60 Million | $2.80 Billion | ▲ +204.8% |
| 1995 | 0.05x | $134.60 Million | $2.48 Billion | ▼ -47.7% |
| 1994 | 0.10x | $155.70 Million | $1.50 Billion | ▼ -2.0% |
| 1993 | 0.11x | $113.30 Million | $1.07 Billion | — |