Lear Corporation (LEA) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Lear Corporation (LEA) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.04x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $460.50 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($10.33 Billion) in one year. See Lear Corporation financial flexibility index to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Lear Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1993–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Lear Corporation across 33 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Lear Corporation operating cash flow efficiency.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Lear Corporation (1993–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Lear Corporation. Check how high is Lear Corporation's earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.11x | $1.09 Billion | $9.64 Billion | ▼ -5.0% |
| 2024 | 0.12x | $1.12 Billion | $9.43 Billion | ▼ -8.4% |
| 2023 | 0.13x | $1.25 Billion | $9.63 Billion | ▲ +13.4% |
| 2022 | 0.11x | $1.02 Billion | $8.93 Billion | ▲ +45.8% |
| 2021 | 0.08x | $670.10 Million | $8.54 Billion | ▲ +1.5% |
| 2020 | 0.08x | $663.10 Million | $8.58 Billion | ▼ -51.5% |
| 2019 | 0.16x | $1.28 Billion | $8.06 Billion | ▼ -36.6% |
| 2018 | 0.25x | $1.78 Billion | $7.08 Billion | ▲ +5.7% |
| 2017 | 0.24x | $1.78 Billion | $7.50 Billion | ▼ -1.5% |
| 2016 | 0.24x | $1.62 Billion | $6.71 Billion | ▲ +21.3% |
| 2015 | 0.20x | $1.27 Billion | $6.39 Billion | ▲ +31.3% |
| 2014 | 0.15x | $927.80 Million | $6.12 Billion | ▼ -4.2% |
| 2013 | 0.16x | $820.10 Million | $5.18 Billion | ▼ -0.6% |
| 2012 | 0.16x | $729.80 Million | $4.58 Billion | ▼ -10.3% |
| 2011 | 0.18x | $790.30 Million | $4.45 Billion | ▲ +15.7% |
| 2010 | 0.15x | $621.90 Million | $4.05 Billion | ▲ +440.9% |
| 2009 | -0.05x | $-175.20 Million | $3.89 Billion | ▼ -308.4% |
| 2008 | 0.02x | $144.20 Million | $6.67 Billion | ▼ -69.0% |
| 2007 | 0.07x | $466.90 Million | $6.71 Billion | ▲ +76.8% |
| 2006 | 0.04x | $285.30 Million | $7.25 Billion | ▼ -49.6% |
| 2005 | 0.08x | $560.80 Million | $7.18 Billion | ▼ -16.6% |
| 2004 | 0.09x | $675.90 Million | $7.21 Billion | ▲ +0.9% |
| 2003 | 0.09x | $586.30 Million | $6.31 Billion | ▼ -0.8% |
| 2002 | 0.09x | $545.10 Million | $5.82 Billion | ▼ -32.1% |
| 2001 | 0.14x | $829.80 Million | $6.02 Billion | ▲ +24.0% |
| 2000 | 0.11x | $753.10 Million | $6.77 Billion | ▲ +43.9% |
| 1999 | 0.08x | $560.30 Million | $7.25 Billion | ▲ +18.5% |
| 1998 | 0.07x | $285.40 Million | $4.38 Billion | ▼ -52.8% |
| 1997 | 0.14x | $449.40 Million | $3.25 Billion | ▼ -16.4% |
| 1996 | 0.17x | $462.60 Million | $2.80 Billion | ▲ +204.8% |
| 1995 | 0.05x | $134.60 Million | $2.48 Billion | ▼ -47.7% |
| 1994 | 0.10x | $155.70 Million | $1.50 Billion | ▼ -2.0% |
| 1993 | 0.11x | $113.30 Million | $1.07 Billion | — |