CryoCell International Inc (CCEL) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
CryoCell International Inc (CCEL) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.03x as of August 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $2.54 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($78.00 Million) in one year. See CryoCell International Inc (CCEL) FCF generation index to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
CryoCell International Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for CryoCell International Inc across 29 annual periods. Also explore CCEL net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for CryoCell International Inc (1996–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for CryoCell International Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see CCEL stock market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.08x | $6.01 Million | $77.89 Million | ▼ -37.5% |
| 2023 | 0.12x | $8.92 Million | $72.25 Million | ▼ -4.4% |
| 2022 | 0.13x | $8.57 Million | $66.41 Million | ▼ -8.0% |
| 2021 | 0.14x | $7.93 Million | $56.48 Million | ▼ -19.0% |
| 2020 | 0.17x | $8.47 Million | $48.87 Million | ▲ +36.6% |
| 2019 | 0.13x | $6.32 Million | $49.84 Million | ▲ +22.0% |
| 2018 | 0.10x | $5.33 Million | $51.30 Million | ▼ -33.8% |
| 2017 | 0.16x | $5.72 Million | $36.41 Million | ▲ +10.0% |
| 2016 | 0.14x | $4.99 Million | $34.95 Million | ▼ -28.0% |
| 2015 | 0.20x | $4.85 Million | $24.46 Million | ▲ +167.1% |
| 2014 | 0.07x | $1.55 Million | $20.94 Million | ▲ +87.6% |
| 2013 | 0.04x | $821.98K | $20.77 Million | ▲ +133.9% |
| 2012 | 0.02x | $360.90K | $21.33 Million | ▼ -54.7% |
| 2011 | 0.04x | $819.12K | $21.93 Million | ▼ -68.5% |
| 2010 | 0.12x | $2.34 Million | $19.71 Million | ▼ -37.4% |
| 2009 | 0.19x | $3.75 Million | $19.79 Million | ▲ +453.6% |
| 2008 | 0.03x | $614.16K | $17.95 Million | ▲ +118.3% |
| 2007 | -0.19x | $-3.40 Million | $18.22 Million | ▼ -438.0% |
| 2006 | 0.06x | $924.90K | $16.73 Million | ▼ -76.2% |
| 2005 | 0.23x | $3.22 Million | $13.84 Million | ▼ -37.6% |
| 2004 | 0.37x | $4.65 Million | $12.48 Million | ▲ +344.9% |
| 2003 | -0.15x | $-1.67 Million | $11.01 Million | ▼ -401.5% |
| 2002 | 0.05x | $201.56K | $4.00 Million | ▼ -88.5% |
| 2001 | 0.44x | $1.26 Million | $2.87 Million | ▲ +192.8% |
| 2000 | 0.15x | $239.53K | $1.60 Million | ▲ +115.0% |
| 1999 | -1.00x | $-500.00K | $500.00K | ▼ -12.5% |
| 1998 | -0.89x | $-1.60 Million | $1.80 Million | ▲ +20.0% |
| 1997 | -1.11x | $-1.00 Million | $900.00K | ▼ -146.3% |
| 1996 | 2.40x | $1.20 Million | $500.00K | — |