CryoCell International Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
CryoCell International Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. CryoCell International Inc (CCEL) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.03x as of August 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $2.54 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($78.00 Million) in one year. Check CryoCell International Inc cash earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of CryoCell International Inc (1996–2024)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of CryoCell International Inc from 1996 to 2024. Historical debt coverage capacity for CryoCell International Inc across 29 annual periods. Check cash flow reinvestment rate of CryoCell International Inc to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CryoCell International Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1996–2024)
CryoCell International Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1996 to 2024. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for CryoCell International Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash efficiency ratio of CryoCell International Inc.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.08x | $6.01 Million | $77.89 Million | ▼ -37.5% |
| 2023 | 0.12x | $8.92 Million | $72.25 Million | ▼ -4.4% |
| 2022 | 0.13x | $8.57 Million | $66.41 Million | ▼ -8.0% |
| 2021 | 0.14x | $7.93 Million | $56.48 Million | ▼ -19.0% |
| 2020 | 0.17x | $8.47 Million | $48.87 Million | ▲ +36.6% |
| 2019 | 0.13x | $6.32 Million | $49.84 Million | ▲ +22.0% |
| 2018 | 0.10x | $5.33 Million | $51.30 Million | ▼ -33.8% |
| 2017 | 0.16x | $5.72 Million | $36.41 Million | ▲ +10.0% |
| 2016 | 0.14x | $4.99 Million | $34.95 Million | ▼ -28.0% |
| 2015 | 0.20x | $4.85 Million | $24.46 Million | ▲ +167.1% |
| 2014 | 0.07x | $1.55 Million | $20.94 Million | ▲ +87.6% |
| 2013 | 0.04x | $821.98K | $20.77 Million | ▲ +133.9% |
| 2012 | 0.02x | $360.90K | $21.33 Million | ▼ -54.7% |
| 2011 | 0.04x | $819.12K | $21.93 Million | ▼ -68.5% |
| 2010 | 0.12x | $2.34 Million | $19.71 Million | ▼ -37.4% |
| 2009 | 0.19x | $3.75 Million | $19.79 Million | ▲ +453.6% |
| 2008 | 0.03x | $614.16K | $17.95 Million | ▲ +118.3% |
| 2007 | -0.19x | $-3.40 Million | $18.22 Million | ▼ -438.0% |
| 2006 | 0.06x | $924.90K | $16.73 Million | ▼ -76.2% |
| 2005 | 0.23x | $3.22 Million | $13.84 Million | ▼ -37.6% |
| 2004 | 0.37x | $4.65 Million | $12.48 Million | ▲ +344.9% |
| 2003 | -0.15x | $-1.67 Million | $11.01 Million | ▼ -401.5% |
| 2002 | 0.05x | $201.56K | $4.00 Million | ▼ -88.5% |
| 2001 | 0.44x | $1.26 Million | $2.87 Million | ▲ +192.8% |
| 2000 | 0.15x | $239.53K | $1.60 Million | ▲ +115.0% |
| 1999 | -1.00x | $-500.00K | $500.00K | ▼ -12.5% |
| 1998 | -0.89x | $-1.60 Million | $1.80 Million | ▲ +20.0% |
| 1997 | -1.11x | $-1.00 Million | $900.00K | ▼ -146.3% |
| 1996 | 2.40x | $1.20 Million | $500.00K | — |