CryoCell International Inc (CCEL) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
CryoCell International Inc (CCEL) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.03x as of August 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $2.54 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($78.00 Million) in one year. See CryoCell International Inc leverage flexibility ratio to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
CryoCell International Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for CryoCell International Inc across 29 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see CryoCell International Inc (CCEL) cash flow conversion.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for CryoCell International Inc (1996–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for CryoCell International Inc. Check CryoCell International Inc (CCEL) cash flow quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.08x | $6.01 Million | $77.89 Million | ▼ -37.5% |
| 2023 | 0.12x | $8.92 Million | $72.25 Million | ▼ -4.4% |
| 2022 | 0.13x | $8.57 Million | $66.41 Million | ▼ -8.0% |
| 2021 | 0.14x | $7.93 Million | $56.48 Million | ▼ -19.0% |
| 2020 | 0.17x | $8.47 Million | $48.87 Million | ▲ +36.6% |
| 2019 | 0.13x | $6.32 Million | $49.84 Million | ▲ +22.0% |
| 2018 | 0.10x | $5.33 Million | $51.30 Million | ▼ -33.8% |
| 2017 | 0.16x | $5.72 Million | $36.41 Million | ▲ +10.0% |
| 2016 | 0.14x | $4.99 Million | $34.95 Million | ▼ -28.0% |
| 2015 | 0.20x | $4.85 Million | $24.46 Million | ▲ +167.1% |
| 2014 | 0.07x | $1.55 Million | $20.94 Million | ▲ +87.6% |
| 2013 | 0.04x | $821.98K | $20.77 Million | ▲ +133.9% |
| 2012 | 0.02x | $360.90K | $21.33 Million | ▼ -54.7% |
| 2011 | 0.04x | $819.12K | $21.93 Million | ▼ -68.5% |
| 2010 | 0.12x | $2.34 Million | $19.71 Million | ▼ -37.4% |
| 2009 | 0.19x | $3.75 Million | $19.79 Million | ▲ +453.6% |
| 2008 | 0.03x | $614.16K | $17.95 Million | ▲ +118.3% |
| 2007 | -0.19x | $-3.40 Million | $18.22 Million | ▼ -438.0% |
| 2006 | 0.06x | $924.90K | $16.73 Million | ▼ -76.2% |
| 2005 | 0.23x | $3.22 Million | $13.84 Million | ▼ -37.6% |
| 2004 | 0.37x | $4.65 Million | $12.48 Million | ▲ +344.9% |
| 2003 | -0.15x | $-1.67 Million | $11.01 Million | ▼ -401.5% |
| 2002 | 0.05x | $201.56K | $4.00 Million | ▼ -88.5% |
| 2001 | 0.44x | $1.26 Million | $2.87 Million | ▲ +192.8% |
| 2000 | 0.15x | $239.53K | $1.60 Million | ▲ +115.0% |
| 1999 | -1.00x | $-500.00K | $500.00K | ▼ -12.5% |
| 1998 | -0.89x | $-1.60 Million | $1.80 Million | ▲ +20.0% |
| 1997 | -1.11x | $-1.00 Million | $900.00K | ▼ -146.3% |
| 1996 | 2.40x | $1.20 Million | $500.00K | — |