CryoCell International Inc (CCEL) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
CryoCell International Inc (CCEL) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.03x as of August 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $2.54 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($78.00 Million) in one year. Explore CCEL long-term investments to assets to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
CryoCell International Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for CryoCell International Inc across 29 annual periods. Also explore CryoCell International Inc (CCEL) total assets for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for CryoCell International Inc (1996–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for CryoCell International Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see CCEL company net worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.08x | $6.01 Million | $77.89 Million | ▼ -37.5% |
| 2023 | 0.12x | $8.92 Million | $72.25 Million | ▼ -4.4% |
| 2022 | 0.13x | $8.57 Million | $66.41 Million | ▼ -8.0% |
| 2021 | 0.14x | $7.93 Million | $56.48 Million | ▼ -19.0% |
| 2020 | 0.17x | $8.47 Million | $48.87 Million | ▲ +36.6% |
| 2019 | 0.13x | $6.32 Million | $49.84 Million | ▲ +22.0% |
| 2018 | 0.10x | $5.33 Million | $51.30 Million | ▼ -33.8% |
| 2017 | 0.16x | $5.72 Million | $36.41 Million | ▲ +10.0% |
| 2016 | 0.14x | $4.99 Million | $34.95 Million | ▼ -28.0% |
| 2015 | 0.20x | $4.85 Million | $24.46 Million | ▲ +167.1% |
| 2014 | 0.07x | $1.55 Million | $20.94 Million | ▲ +87.6% |
| 2013 | 0.04x | $821.98K | $20.77 Million | ▲ +133.9% |
| 2012 | 0.02x | $360.90K | $21.33 Million | ▼ -54.7% |
| 2011 | 0.04x | $819.12K | $21.93 Million | ▼ -68.5% |
| 2010 | 0.12x | $2.34 Million | $19.71 Million | ▼ -37.4% |
| 2009 | 0.19x | $3.75 Million | $19.79 Million | ▲ +453.6% |
| 2008 | 0.03x | $614.16K | $17.95 Million | ▲ +118.3% |
| 2007 | -0.19x | $-3.40 Million | $18.22 Million | ▼ -438.0% |
| 2006 | 0.06x | $924.90K | $16.73 Million | ▼ -76.2% |
| 2005 | 0.23x | $3.22 Million | $13.84 Million | ▼ -37.6% |
| 2004 | 0.37x | $4.65 Million | $12.48 Million | ▲ +344.9% |
| 2003 | -0.15x | $-1.67 Million | $11.01 Million | ▼ -401.5% |
| 2002 | 0.05x | $201.56K | $4.00 Million | ▼ -88.5% |
| 2001 | 0.44x | $1.26 Million | $2.87 Million | ▲ +192.8% |
| 2000 | 0.15x | $239.53K | $1.60 Million | ▲ +115.0% |
| 1999 | -1.00x | $-500.00K | $500.00K | ▼ -12.5% |
| 1998 | -0.89x | $-1.60 Million | $1.80 Million | ▲ +20.0% |
| 1997 | -1.11x | $-1.00 Million | $900.00K | ▼ -146.3% |
| 1996 | 2.40x | $1.20 Million | $500.00K | — |