CryoCell International Inc (CCEL) — Free Cash Flow Generation Index
CryoCell International Inc (CCEL) has a Free Cash Flow Generation Index of 0.98x as of August 2025. Free cash flow of $2.50 Million represents 1% of operating cash flow ($2.54 Million). Explore CryoCell International Inc capex to cash flow ratio to see what proportion of operating cash flow is directed to capital expenditures.
FCF Generation Index
Free Cash Flow
Operating Cash Flow
Capital Expenditures
CryoCell International Inc Free Cash Flow Generation Index (1996–2024)
Historical FCF Generation Index trend for CryoCell International Inc across 24 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see CCEL cash generation efficiency.
Annual Free Cash Flow Generation for CryoCell International Inc (1996–2024)
Year-by-year Free Cash Flow Generation Index for CryoCell International Inc. Check CryoCell International Inc (CCEL) total reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
| Year | FCG Index | Free Cash Flow (USD) | Operating CF | Capital Expenditures | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.60x | $3.61 Million | $6.01 Million | $2.40 Million | ▲ +317.9% |
| 2023 | 0.14x | $1.28 Million | $8.92 Million | $7.64 Million | ▲ +114.3% |
| 2022 | -1.00x | $-8.60 Million | $8.57 Million | $17.17 Million | ▼ -915.2% |
| 2021 | 0.12x | $974.92K | $7.93 Million | $6.95 Million | ▼ -87.0% |
| 2020 | 0.95x | $8.02 Million | $8.47 Million | $449.96K | ▲ +5.8% |
| 2019 | 0.90x | $5.66 Million | $6.32 Million | $662.29K | ▲ +1.9% |
| 2018 | 0.88x | $4.69 Million | $5.33 Million | $646.16K | ▼ -10.6% |
| 2017 | 0.98x | $5.62 Million | $5.72 Million | $98.33K | ▲ +5.5% |
| 2016 | 0.93x | $4.64 Million | $4.99 Million | $342.98K | ▼ -4.7% |
| 2015 | 0.98x | $4.74 Million | $4.85 Million | $108.48K | ▲ +6.0% |
| 2014 | 0.92x | $1.43 Million | $1.55 Million | $120.52K | ▲ +78.6% |
| 2013 | 0.52x | $424.67K | $821.98K | $397.31K | ▼ -9.2% |
| 2012 | 0.57x | $205.36K | $360.90K | $155.54K | ▲ +107.5% |
| 2011 | 0.27x | $224.62K | $819.12K | $594.50K | ▼ -66.9% |
| 2010 | 0.83x | $1.94 Million | $2.34 Million | $398.90K | ▼ -0.3% |
| 2009 | 0.83x | $3.12 Million | $3.75 Million | $628.46K | ▲ +58.8% |
| 2008 | 0.52x | $321.87K | $614.16K | $292.29K | ▲ +786.0% |
| 2006 | -0.08x | $-70.66K | $924.90K | $995.56K | ▼ -109.8% |
| 2005 | 0.78x | $2.51 Million | $3.22 Million | $709.12K | ▲ +50.6% |
| 2004 | 0.52x | $2.41 Million | $4.65 Million | $2.24 Million | ▲ +111.1% |
| 2002 | -4.65x | $-936.33K | $201.56K | $1.14 Million | ▼ -1088.2% |
| 2001 | 0.47x | $591.38K | $1.26 Million | $666.61K | ▲ +141.6% |
| 2000 | -1.13x | $-270.89K | $239.53K | $510.42K | ▼ -223.4% |
| 1996 | 0.92x | $1.10 Million | $1.20 Million | $100.00K | — |