CryoCell International Inc (CCEL) — Net Asset Quality Index
CryoCell International Inc (CCEL) has a Net Asset Quality Index of -23.5% as of August 2025. This metric measures the proportion of total assets financed by shareholders' equity — total assets of $63.17 Million minus total liabilities of $78.00 Million yields net assets of $-14.83 Million. A higher index indicates a stronger, lower-leverage balance sheet. See CryoCell International Inc (CCEL) defensive interval to measure how many days the company can operate on defensive assets alone.
Quality Index
Net Assets
Total Assets
Total Liabilities
CryoCell International Inc Net Asset Quality Index Over Time (1996–2024)
This chart shows how CryoCell International Inc's Net Asset Quality Index has evolved across 29 annual periods from 1996 to 2024. As of August 2025, the index stands at -23.5%, representing net assets of $-14.83 Million against total assets of $63.17 Million USD. Explore CryoCell International Inc (CCEL) cash flow conversion to assess how effectively this company generates cash.
Annual Net Asset Quality Index for CryoCell International Inc (1996–2024)
The table below presents the year-by-year Net Asset Quality Index for CryoCell International Inc from 1996 to 2024, covering 29 annual filings. Each row shows total assets, total liabilities, net assets, the quality index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For market capitalisation and the full company profile, see CCEL company net worth.
| Year | Quality Index | Net Assets (USD) | Total Assets | Total Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -20.4% | $-13.22 Million | $64.68 Million | $77.89 Million | ▼ -2.4 pp |
| 2023 | -18.0% | $-11.03 Million | $61.22 Million | $72.25 Million | ▼ -15.7 pp |
| 2022 | -2.3% | $-1.52 Million | $64.89 Million | $66.41 Million | ▼ -9.2 pp |
| 2021 | 6.9% | $4.18 Million | $60.66 Million | $56.48 Million | ▲ +12.7 pp |
| 2020 | -5.8% | $-2.67 Million | $46.20 Million | $48.87 Million | ▲ +10.4 pp |
| 2019 | -16.2% | $-6.95 Million | $42.89 Million | $49.84 Million | ▲ +4.8 pp |
| 2018 | -21.0% | $-8.91 Million | $42.39 Million | $51.30 Million | ▲ +31.3 pp |
| 2017 | -52.3% | $-12.50 Million | $23.91 Million | $36.41 Million | ▲ +26.6 pp |
| 2016 | -78.9% | $-15.41 Million | $19.54 Million | $34.95 Million | ▼ -53.4 pp |
| 2015 | -25.5% | $-4.96 Million | $19.50 Million | $24.46 Million | ▲ +79.6 pp |
| 2014 | -105.1% | $-10.73 Million | $10.21 Million | $20.94 Million | ▼ -24.5 pp |
| 2013 | -80.6% | $-9.27 Million | $11.50 Million | $20.77 Million | ▼ -7.6 pp |
| 2012 | -73.0% | $-9.00 Million | $12.33 Million | $21.33 Million | ▼ -60.3 pp |
| 2011 | -12.6% | $-2.46 Million | $19.47 Million | $21.93 Million | ▼ -4.1 pp |
| 2010 | -8.5% | $-1.55 Million | $18.16 Million | $19.71 Million | ▲ +26.9 pp |
| 2009 | -35.5% | $-5.18 Million | $14.61 Million | $19.79 Million | ▲ +28.1 pp |
| 2008 | -63.6% | $-6.98 Million | $10.97 Million | $17.95 Million | ▼ -6.9 pp |
| 2007 | -56.7% | $-6.59 Million | $11.63 Million | $18.22 Million | ▼ -42.4 pp |
| 2006 | -14.3% | $-2.09 Million | $14.64 Million | $16.73 Million | ▼ -17.1 pp |
| 2005 | 2.8% | $394.56K | $14.23 Million | $13.84 Million | ▲ +10.0 pp |
| 2004 | -7.2% | $-835.75K | $11.64 Million | $12.48 Million | ▲ +45.3 pp |
| 2003 | -52.5% | $-3.79 Million | $7.22 Million | $11.01 Million | ▼ -123.7 pp |
| 2002 | 71.2% | $9.87 Million | $13.86 Million | $4.00 Million | ▼ -12.3 pp |
| 2001 | 83.5% | $14.52 Million | $17.39 Million | $2.87 Million | ▲ +2.9 pp |
| 2000 | 80.6% | $6.64 Million | $8.24 Million | $1.60 Million | ▼ -10.4 pp |
| 1999 | 90.9% | $5.00 Million | $5.50 Million | $500.00K | ▲ +34.8 pp |
| 1998 | 56.1% | $2.30 Million | $4.10 Million | $1.80 Million | ▼ -21.4 pp |
| 1997 | 77.5% | $3.10 Million | $4.00 Million | $900.00K | ▼ -10.6 pp |
| 1996 | 88.1% | $3.70 Million | $4.20 Million | $500.00K | — |