CryoCell International Inc Tangible Net Worth Ratio
CryoCell International Inc tangible net worth ratio. CryoCell International Inc (CCEL) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of -255.9% as of May 2022. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets ($15.68 Million) from net assets ($4.41 Million) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. Also explore how fast is CryoCell International Inc growing its equity to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Tangible Net Worth Ratio of CryoCell International Inc (1996–2021)
Tangible net worth ratio of CryoCell International Inc from 1996 to 2021. This chart shows how CryoCell International Inc's Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 9 annual periods from 1996 to 2021. As of May 2022, the ratio stands at -255.9%, reflecting net assets of $4.41 Million with intangible assets of $15.68 Million USD. Check CryoCell International Inc (CCEL) strategic asset index to assess the company's strategic physical and investment asset allocation.
CryoCell International Inc Tangible Net Worth Ratio by Year (1996–2021)
CryoCell International Inc tangible net worth ratio by year from 1996 to 2021. The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for CryoCell International Inc from 1996 to 2021, covering 9 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. For live market cap and overall valuation, see CryoCell International Inc (CCEL) market capitalisation.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (USD) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | -287.4% | $4.18 Million | $16.21 Million | $60.66 Million | ▼ -387.4 pp |
| 2005 | 100.0% | $394.56K | $0.00 | $14.23 Million | ▲ +1.0 pp |
| 2002 | 99.0% | $9.87 Million | $102.34K | $13.86 Million | ▼ -0.2 pp |
| 2001 | 99.2% | $14.52 Million | $119.66K | $17.39 Million | ▲ +0.8 pp |
| 2000 | 98.4% | $6.64 Million | $108.67K | $8.24 Million | ▲ +0.4 pp |
| 1999 | 98.0% | $5.00 Million | $100.00K | $5.50 Million | ▲ +2.3 pp |
| 1998 | 95.7% | $2.30 Million | $100.00K | $4.10 Million | ▼ -1.1 pp |
| 1997 | 96.8% | $3.10 Million | $100.00K | $4.00 Million | ▼ -0.5 pp |
| 1996 | 97.3% | $3.70 Million | $100.00K | $4.20 Million | — |