Motorola Solutions Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Motorola Solutions Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Motorola Solutions Inc (MSI) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.06x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $920.00 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($16.55 Billion) in one year. Check Motorola Solutions Inc (MSI) cash flow quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Motorola Solutions Inc (1989–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Motorola Solutions Inc from 1989 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Motorola Solutions Inc across 37 annual periods. Check Motorola Solutions Inc cash flow reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Motorola Solutions Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1989–2025)
Motorola Solutions Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1989 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Motorola Solutions Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Motorola Solutions Inc (MSI) cash conversion ratio.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.17x | $2.84 Billion | $16.96 Billion | ▼ -9.9% |
| 2024 | 0.19x | $2.39 Billion | $12.88 Billion | ▲ +14.4% |
| 2023 | 0.16x | $2.04 Billion | $12.60 Billion | ▲ +12.9% |
| 2022 | 0.14x | $1.82 Billion | $12.68 Billion | ▼ -4.4% |
| 2021 | 0.15x | $1.84 Billion | $12.21 Billion | ▲ +6.5% |
| 2020 | 0.14x | $1.61 Billion | $11.42 Billion | ▼ -12.2% |
| 2019 | 0.16x | $1.82 Billion | $11.32 Billion | ▲ +60.0% |
| 2018 | 0.10x | $1.07 Billion | $10.69 Billion | ▼ -25.7% |
| 2017 | 0.14x | $1.35 Billion | $9.94 Billion | ▲ +9.0% |
| 2016 | 0.12x | $1.17 Billion | $9.38 Billion | ▲ +4.9% |
| 2015 | 0.12x | $1.00 Billion | $8.48 Billion | ▲ +253.8% |
| 2014 | -0.08x | $-590.00 Million | $7.66 Billion | ▼ -166.6% |
| 2013 | 0.12x | $944.00 Million | $8.16 Billion | ▲ +1.5% |
| 2012 | 0.11x | $1.07 Billion | $9.39 Billion | ▲ +12.9% |
| 2011 | 0.10x | $874.00 Million | $8.65 Billion | ▼ -25.1% |
| 2010 | 0.13x | $1.97 Billion | $14.59 Billion | ▲ +236.9% |
| 2009 | 0.04x | $629.00 Million | $15.72 Billion | ▲ +203.6% |
| 2008 | 0.01x | $242.00 Million | $18.36 Billion | ▼ -64.1% |
| 2007 | 0.04x | $710.00 Million | $19.36 Billion | ▼ -77.5% |
| 2006 | 0.16x | $3.50 Billion | $21.45 Billion | ▼ -32.8% |
| 2005 | 0.24x | $4.61 Billion | $18.98 Billion | ▲ +39.0% |
| 2004 | 0.17x | $3.07 Billion | $17.56 Billion | ▲ +22.3% |
| 2003 | 0.14x | $2.77 Billion | $19.41 Billion | ▲ +112.3% |
| 2002 | 0.07x | $1.34 Billion | $19.91 Billion | ▼ -34.6% |
| 2001 | 0.10x | $1.98 Billion | $19.22 Billion | ▲ +305.3% |
| 2000 | -0.05x | $-1.16 Billion | $23.25 Billion | ▼ -153.2% |
| 1999 | 0.09x | $1.93 Billion | $20.50 Billion | ▲ +52.1% |
| 1998 | 0.06x | $1.02 Billion | $16.51 Billion | ▼ -66.6% |
| 1997 | 0.19x | $2.60 Billion | $14.01 Billion | ▼ -45.7% |
| 1996 | 0.34x | $4.19 Billion | $12.28 Billion | ▲ +22.0% |
| 1995 | 0.28x | $3.29 Billion | $11.75 Billion | ▼ -7.5% |
| 1994 | 0.30x | $2.55 Billion | $8.44 Billion | ▼ -7.4% |
| 1993 | 0.33x | $2.31 Billion | $7.09 Billion | ▼ -7.8% |
| 1992 | 0.35x | $1.94 Billion | $5.49 Billion | ▲ +23.7% |
| 1991 | 0.29x | $1.36 Billion | $4.75 Billion | ▼ -1.9% |
| 1990 | 0.29x | $1.31 Billion | $4.49 Billion | ▼ -6.5% |
| 1989 | 0.31x | $1.21 Billion | $3.88 Billion | — |