Royce Value Closed Fund Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Royce Value Closed Fund cash flow-to-debt ratio. Royce Value Closed Fund (RVT) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.51x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $2.31 Million could theoretically repay 1% of its total liabilities ($4.50 Million) in one year. Check earnings quality score of Royce Value Closed Fund to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Royce Value Closed Fund (1995–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Royce Value Closed Fund from 1995 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Royce Value Closed Fund across 31 annual periods. Check Royce Value Closed Fund (RVT) total reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Royce Value Closed Fund Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1995–2025)
Royce Value Closed Fund cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1995 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Royce Value Closed Fund. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see how efficiently does Royce Value Closed Fund generate cash.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1.21x | $5.44 Million | $4.50 Million | ▲ +133.3% |
| 2024 | 0.52x | $19.60 Million | $37.84 Million | ▼ -71.0% |
| 2023 | 1.79x | $70.88 Million | $39.68 Million | ▼ -37.2% |
| 2022 | 2.84x | $119.05 Million | $41.85 Million | ▲ +115.8% |
| 2021 | 1.32x | $100.49 Million | $76.21 Million | ▲ +69.9% |
| 2020 | 0.78x | $59.40 Million | $76.53 Million | ▲ +11.6% |
| 2019 | 0.70x | $50.10 Million | $72.02 Million | ▲ +229.8% |
| 2018 | -0.54x | $-32.52 Million | $60.66 Million | ▼ -173.2% |
| 2017 | 0.73x | $54.62 Million | $74.57 Million | ▼ -99.9% |
| 2016 | 655.95x | $47.78 Million | $72.83K | ▼ -14.6% |
| 2015 | 768.45x | $54.88 Million | $71.42K | ▲ +49077.0% |
| 2014 | 1.56x | $115.57 Million | $73.96 Million | ▼ -4.3% |
| 2013 | 1.63x | $185.20 Million | $113.46 Million | ▲ +124.8% |
| 2012 | 0.73x | $109.70 Million | $151.10 Million | ▲ +119.1% |
| 2011 | -3.80x | $-101.20 Million | $26.60 Million | ▼ -119.4% |
| 2010 | 19.57x | $270.10 Million | $13.80 Million | ▲ +131.9% |
| 2009 | 8.44x | $270.10 Million | $32.00 Million | ▲ +142.8% |
| 2008 | -19.74x | $-517.10 Million | $26.20 Million | ▼ -5667.0% |
| 2007 | 0.35x | $70.80 Million | $199.70 Million | ▼ -80.5% |
| 2006 | 1.82x | $210.20 Million | $115.40 Million | ▲ +56.1% |
| 2005 | 1.17x | $94.50 Million | $81.00 Million | ▼ -53.0% |
| 2004 | 2.48x | $191.30 Million | $77.00 Million | ▼ -34.7% |
| 2003 | 3.80x | $280.80 Million | $73.80 Million | ▲ +222.2% |
| 2002 | -3.11x | $-94.00 Million | $30.20 Million | ▼ -106.4% |
| 2001 | 48.76x | $102.40 Million | $2.10 Million | ▲ +226.7% |
| 2000 | 14.93x | $100.00 Million | $6.70 Million | ▼ -41.6% |
| 1999 | 25.54x | $66.40 Million | $2.60 Million | ▲ +216.9% |
| 1998 | 8.06x | $27.40 Million | $3.40 Million | ▲ +1366.5% |
| 1997 | 0.55x | $17.20 Million | $31.30 Million | ▲ +147.1% |
| 1996 | -1.17x | $-46.00 Million | $39.40 Million | ▼ -594.3% |
| 1995 | -0.17x | $-7.50 Million | $44.60 Million | — |