Royce Value Closed Fund (RVT) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Royce Value Closed Fund (RVT) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.51x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $2.31 Million could theoretically repay 1% of its total liabilities ($4.50 Million) in one year. See Royce Value Closed Fund financial flexibility index to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Royce Value Closed Fund Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1995–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Royce Value Closed Fund across 31 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see RVT cash generation efficiency.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Royce Value Closed Fund (1995–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Royce Value Closed Fund. Check RVT cash flow quality score to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1.21x | $5.44 Million | $4.50 Million | ▲ +133.3% |
| 2024 | 0.52x | $19.60 Million | $37.84 Million | ▼ -71.0% |
| 2023 | 1.79x | $70.88 Million | $39.68 Million | ▼ -37.2% |
| 2022 | 2.84x | $119.05 Million | $41.85 Million | ▲ +115.8% |
| 2021 | 1.32x | $100.49 Million | $76.21 Million | ▲ +69.9% |
| 2020 | 0.78x | $59.40 Million | $76.53 Million | ▲ +11.6% |
| 2019 | 0.70x | $50.10 Million | $72.02 Million | ▲ +229.8% |
| 2018 | -0.54x | $-32.52 Million | $60.66 Million | ▼ -173.2% |
| 2017 | 0.73x | $54.62 Million | $74.57 Million | ▼ -99.9% |
| 2016 | 655.95x | $47.78 Million | $72.83K | ▼ -14.6% |
| 2015 | 768.45x | $54.88 Million | $71.42K | ▲ +49077.0% |
| 2014 | 1.56x | $115.57 Million | $73.96 Million | ▼ -4.3% |
| 2013 | 1.63x | $185.20 Million | $113.46 Million | ▲ +124.8% |
| 2012 | 0.73x | $109.70 Million | $151.10 Million | ▲ +119.1% |
| 2011 | -3.80x | $-101.20 Million | $26.60 Million | ▼ -119.4% |
| 2010 | 19.57x | $270.10 Million | $13.80 Million | ▲ +131.9% |
| 2009 | 8.44x | $270.10 Million | $32.00 Million | ▲ +142.8% |
| 2008 | -19.74x | $-517.10 Million | $26.20 Million | ▼ -5667.0% |
| 2007 | 0.35x | $70.80 Million | $199.70 Million | ▼ -80.5% |
| 2006 | 1.82x | $210.20 Million | $115.40 Million | ▲ +56.1% |
| 2005 | 1.17x | $94.50 Million | $81.00 Million | ▼ -53.0% |
| 2004 | 2.48x | $191.30 Million | $77.00 Million | ▼ -34.7% |
| 2003 | 3.80x | $280.80 Million | $73.80 Million | ▲ +222.2% |
| 2002 | -3.11x | $-94.00 Million | $30.20 Million | ▼ -106.4% |
| 2001 | 48.76x | $102.40 Million | $2.10 Million | ▲ +226.7% |
| 2000 | 14.93x | $100.00 Million | $6.70 Million | ▼ -41.6% |
| 1999 | 25.54x | $66.40 Million | $2.60 Million | ▲ +216.9% |
| 1998 | 8.06x | $27.40 Million | $3.40 Million | ▲ +1366.5% |
| 1997 | 0.55x | $17.20 Million | $31.30 Million | ▲ +147.1% |
| 1996 | -1.17x | $-46.00 Million | $39.40 Million | ▼ -594.3% |
| 1995 | -0.17x | $-7.50 Million | $44.60 Million | — |