Royce Value Closed Fund (RVT) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Royce Value Closed Fund (RVT) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.51x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $2.31 Million could theoretically repay 1% of its total liabilities ($4.50 Million) in one year. See Royce Value Closed Fund free cash flow ratio to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Royce Value Closed Fund Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1995–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Royce Value Closed Fund across 31 annual periods. Also explore RVT shareholders equity momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Royce Value Closed Fund (1995–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Royce Value Closed Fund. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see market cap of Royce Value Closed Fund.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1.21x | $5.44 Million | $4.50 Million | ▲ +133.3% |
| 2024 | 0.52x | $19.60 Million | $37.84 Million | ▼ -71.0% |
| 2023 | 1.79x | $70.88 Million | $39.68 Million | ▼ -37.2% |
| 2022 | 2.84x | $119.05 Million | $41.85 Million | ▲ +115.8% |
| 2021 | 1.32x | $100.49 Million | $76.21 Million | ▲ +69.9% |
| 2020 | 0.78x | $59.40 Million | $76.53 Million | ▲ +11.6% |
| 2019 | 0.70x | $50.10 Million | $72.02 Million | ▲ +229.8% |
| 2018 | -0.54x | $-32.52 Million | $60.66 Million | ▼ -173.2% |
| 2017 | 0.73x | $54.62 Million | $74.57 Million | ▼ -99.9% |
| 2016 | 655.95x | $47.78 Million | $72.83K | ▼ -14.6% |
| 2015 | 768.45x | $54.88 Million | $71.42K | ▲ +49077.0% |
| 2014 | 1.56x | $115.57 Million | $73.96 Million | ▼ -4.3% |
| 2013 | 1.63x | $185.20 Million | $113.46 Million | ▲ +124.8% |
| 2012 | 0.73x | $109.70 Million | $151.10 Million | ▲ +119.1% |
| 2011 | -3.80x | $-101.20 Million | $26.60 Million | ▼ -119.4% |
| 2010 | 19.57x | $270.10 Million | $13.80 Million | ▲ +131.9% |
| 2009 | 8.44x | $270.10 Million | $32.00 Million | ▲ +142.8% |
| 2008 | -19.74x | $-517.10 Million | $26.20 Million | ▼ -5667.0% |
| 2007 | 0.35x | $70.80 Million | $199.70 Million | ▼ -80.5% |
| 2006 | 1.82x | $210.20 Million | $115.40 Million | ▲ +56.1% |
| 2005 | 1.17x | $94.50 Million | $81.00 Million | ▼ -53.0% |
| 2004 | 2.48x | $191.30 Million | $77.00 Million | ▼ -34.7% |
| 2003 | 3.80x | $280.80 Million | $73.80 Million | ▲ +222.2% |
| 2002 | -3.11x | $-94.00 Million | $30.20 Million | ▼ -106.4% |
| 2001 | 48.76x | $102.40 Million | $2.10 Million | ▲ +226.7% |
| 2000 | 14.93x | $100.00 Million | $6.70 Million | ▼ -41.6% |
| 1999 | 25.54x | $66.40 Million | $2.60 Million | ▲ +216.9% |
| 1998 | 8.06x | $27.40 Million | $3.40 Million | ▲ +1366.5% |
| 1997 | 0.55x | $17.20 Million | $31.30 Million | ▲ +147.1% |
| 1996 | -1.17x | $-46.00 Million | $39.40 Million | ▼ -594.3% |
| 1995 | -0.17x | $-7.50 Million | $44.60 Million | — |