Royce Value Closed Fund (RVT) — Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Royce Value Closed Fund (RVT) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of 100.0% as of December 2025. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets ($0.00) from net assets ($2.16 Billion) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. Also explore how fast is Royce Value Closed Fund growing its equity to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Royce Value Closed Fund Tangible Net Worth Ratio (1995–2025)
This chart shows how Royce Value Closed Fund's Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 31 annual periods from 1995 to 2025. As of December 2025, the ratio stands at 100.0%, reflecting net assets of $2.16 Billion with intangible assets of $0.00 USD. Check Royce Value Closed Fund strategic asset allocation index to assess the company's strategic physical and investment asset allocation.
Annual Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Royce Value Closed Fund (1995–2025)
The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Royce Value Closed Fund from 1995 to 2025, covering 31 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. For live market cap and overall valuation, see RVT market cap overview.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (USD) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 100.0% | $2.16 Billion | $0.00 | $2.17 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2024 | 100.0% | $2.00 Billion | $0.00 | $2.04 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2023 | 100.0% | $1.86 Billion | $0.00 | $1.90 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2022 | 100.0% | $1.61 Billion | $0.00 | $1.65 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2021 | 100.0% | $2.15 Billion | $0.00 | $2.23 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2020 | 100.0% | $1.89 Billion | $0.00 | $1.97 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2019 | 100.0% | $1.63 Billion | $0.00 | $1.70 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2018 | 100.0% | $1.30 Billion | $0.00 | $1.36 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2017 | 100.0% | $1.48 Billion | $0.00 | $1.56 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2016 | 100.0% | $1.30 Million | $0.00 | $1.37 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2015 | 100.0% | $1.07 Million | $0.00 | $1.14 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2014 | 100.0% | $1.23 Billion | $0.00 | $1.31 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2013 | 100.0% | $1.31 Billion | $0.00 | $1.42 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2012 | 100.0% | $1.08 Billion | $0.00 | $1.23 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2011 | 100.0% | $1.19 Billion | $0.00 | $1.21 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2010 | 100.0% | $1.33 Billion | $0.00 | $1.34 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2009 | 100.0% | $1.07 Billion | $0.00 | $1.10 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2008 | 100.0% | $823.20 Million | $0.00 | $849.40 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2007 | 100.0% | $1.40 Billion | $0.00 | $1.60 Billion | ▲ +9.0 pp |
| 2006 | 91.0% | $1.40 Billion | $126.27 Million | $1.52 Billion | ▼ -9.0 pp |
| 2005 | 100.0% | $1.25 Billion | $0.00 | $1.33 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2004 | 100.0% | $1.21 Billion | $0.00 | $1.29 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2003 | 100.0% | $1.07 Billion | $0.00 | $1.14 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2002 | 100.0% | $720.80 Million | $0.00 | $751.00 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2001 | 100.0% | $849.10 Million | $0.00 | $851.20 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2000 | 100.0% | $783.30 Million | $0.00 | $790.00 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1999 | 100.0% | $713.00 Million | $0.00 | $715.60 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1998 | 100.0% | $677.00 Million | $0.00 | $680.40 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1997 | 100.0% | $554.20 Million | $0.00 | $585.50 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1996 | 100.0% | $441.80 Million | $0.00 | $481.20 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1995 | 100.0% | $339.00 Million | $0.00 | $383.60 Million | — |