Royce Value Closed Fund (RVT) — Strategic Asset Allocation Index
Royce Value Closed Fund (RVT) has a Strategic Asset Allocation Index of 101.8% as of December 2024. Strategic assets (PP&E of $- plus long-term investments of $2.03 Billion) total $2.03 Billion, measured against net assets of $2.00 Billion. A higher index reflects capital-intensive or investment-heavy strategies where strategic assets dominate the equity base. Check tangible net worth ratio of Royce Value Closed Fund to evaluate the tangible quality of the company's equity base.
SAAI
Strategic Assets
PP&E
Net Assets
Royce Value Closed Fund Strategic Asset Allocation Index (2006–2025)
This chart shows how Royce Value Closed Fund's Strategic Asset Allocation Index has evolved across 15 annual periods from 2006 to 2025. As of December 2024, the index stands at 101.8%, representing strategic assets of $2.03 Billion against net assets of $2.00 Billion USD.
Annual Strategic Asset Allocation Index for Royce Value Closed Fund (2006–2025)
The table below presents the year-by-year Strategic Asset Allocation Index for Royce Value Closed Fund from 2006 to 2025, covering 15 annual filings. Each row shows PP&E, long-term investments, strategic assets combined, net assets, the index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For live market cap and overall valuation, see Royce Value Closed Fund (RVT) market capitalisation.
| Year | SAAI | Strategic Assets (USD) | PP&E | LT Investments | Net Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 100.0% | $2.17 Billion | $- | $2.17 Billion | $2.16 Billion | ▼ -1.7 pp |
| 2024 | 101.8% | $2.03 Billion | $- | $2.03 Billion | $2.00 Billion | ▲ +0.1 pp |
| 2023 | 101.7% | $1.90 Billion | $- | $1.90 Billion | $1.86 Billion | ▼ -0.4 pp |
| 2022 | 102.1% | $1.64 Billion | $- | $1.64 Billion | $1.61 Billion | ▲ +3.8 pp |
| 2021 | 98.3% | $2.11 Billion | $- | $2.11 Billion | $2.15 Billion | ▼ -5.5 pp |
| 2020 | 103.9% | $1.96 Billion | $- | $1.96 Billion | $1.89 Billion | ▼ -0.4 pp |
| 2019 | 104.3% | $1.70 Billion | $- | $1.70 Billion | $1.63 Billion | ▼ -0.2 pp |
| 2018 | 104.5% | $1.36 Billion | $- | $1.36 Billion | $1.30 Billion | ▼ -0.3 pp |
| 2017 | 104.8% | $1.55 Billion | $- | $1.55 Billion | $1.48 Billion | ▼ -84228.5 pp |
| 2016 | 84333.3% | $1.09 Billion | $- | $1.09 Billion | $1.30 Million | ▼ -10000.4 pp |
| 2015 | 94333.7% | $1.01 Billion | $- | $1.01 Billion | $1.07 Million | ▲ +94241.3 pp |
| 2014 | 92.4% | $1.14 Billion | $- | $1.14 Billion | $1.23 Billion | ▼ -10.6 pp |
| 2008 | 103.0% | $848.14 Million | $- | $848.14 Million | $823.20 Million | ▼ -4.0 pp |
| 2007 | 107.0% | $1.50 Billion | $- | $1.50 Billion | $1.40 Billion | ▲ +8.2 pp |
| 2006 | 98.8% | $1.38 Billion | $- | $1.38 Billion | $1.40 Billion | — |