Royce Value Closed Fund (RVT) — Net Asset Quality Index
Royce Value Closed Fund (RVT) has a Net Asset Quality Index of 99.8% as of December 2025. This metric measures the proportion of total assets financed by shareholders' equity — total assets of $2.17 Billion minus total liabilities of $4.50 Million yields net assets of $2.16 Billion. A higher index indicates a stronger, lower-leverage balance sheet. Check RVT financial resilience to evaluate the company's liquid asset resilience ratio.
Quality Index
Net Assets
Total Assets
Total Liabilities
Royce Value Closed Fund Net Asset Quality Index Over Time (1995–2025)
This chart shows how Royce Value Closed Fund's Net Asset Quality Index has evolved across 31 annual periods from 1995 to 2025. As of December 2025, the index stands at 99.8%, representing net assets of $2.16 Billion against total assets of $2.17 Billion USD. See how liquid is Royce Value Closed Fund's working capital to evaluate short-term liquidity relative to the company's equity base.
Annual Net Asset Quality Index for Royce Value Closed Fund (1995–2025)
The table below presents the year-by-year Net Asset Quality Index for Royce Value Closed Fund from 1995 to 2025, covering 31 annual filings. Each row shows total assets, total liabilities, net assets, the quality index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For market capitalisation and the full company profile, see RVT stock market capitalisation.
| Year | Quality Index | Net Assets (USD) | Total Assets | Total Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 99.8% | $2.16 Billion | $2.17 Billion | $4.50 Million | ▲ +1.7 pp |
| 2024 | 98.1% | $2.00 Billion | $2.04 Billion | $37.84 Million | ▲ +0.2 pp |
| 2023 | 97.9% | $1.86 Billion | $1.90 Billion | $39.68 Million | ▲ +0.5 pp |
| 2022 | 97.5% | $1.61 Billion | $1.65 Billion | $41.85 Million | ▲ +0.9 pp |
| 2021 | 96.6% | $2.15 Billion | $2.23 Billion | $76.21 Million | ▲ +0.5 pp |
| 2020 | 96.1% | $1.89 Billion | $1.97 Billion | $76.53 Million | ▲ +0.3 pp |
| 2019 | 95.8% | $1.63 Billion | $1.70 Billion | $72.02 Million | ▲ +0.2 pp |
| 2018 | 95.6% | $1.30 Billion | $1.36 Billion | $60.66 Million | ▲ +0.4 pp |
| 2017 | 95.2% | $1.48 Billion | $1.56 Billion | $74.57 Million | ▲ +0.5 pp |
| 2016 | 94.7% | $1.30 Million | $1.37 Million | $72.83K | ▲ +0.9 pp |
| 2015 | 93.8% | $1.07 Million | $1.14 Million | $71.42K | ▼ -0.6 pp |
| 2014 | 94.3% | $1.23 Billion | $1.31 Billion | $73.96 Million | ▲ +2.3 pp |
| 2013 | 92.0% | $1.31 Billion | $1.42 Billion | $113.46 Million | ▲ +4.3 pp |
| 2012 | 87.8% | $1.08 Billion | $1.23 Billion | $151.10 Million | ▼ -10.1 pp |
| 2011 | 97.8% | $1.19 Billion | $1.21 Billion | $26.60 Million | ▼ -1.2 pp |
| 2010 | 99.0% | $1.33 Billion | $1.34 Billion | $13.80 Million | ▲ +1.9 pp |
| 2009 | 97.1% | $1.07 Billion | $1.10 Billion | $32.00 Million | ▲ +0.2 pp |
| 2008 | 96.9% | $823.20 Million | $849.40 Million | $26.20 Million | ▲ +9.4 pp |
| 2007 | 87.6% | $1.40 Billion | $1.60 Billion | $199.70 Million | ▼ -4.8 pp |
| 2006 | 92.4% | $1.40 Billion | $1.52 Billion | $115.40 Million | ▼ -1.5 pp |
| 2005 | 93.9% | $1.25 Billion | $1.33 Billion | $81.00 Million | ▼ -0.1 pp |
| 2004 | 94.0% | $1.21 Billion | $1.29 Billion | $77.00 Million | ▲ +0.5 pp |
| 2003 | 93.6% | $1.07 Billion | $1.14 Billion | $73.80 Million | ▼ -2.4 pp |
| 2002 | 96.0% | $720.80 Million | $751.00 Million | $30.20 Million | ▼ -3.8 pp |
| 2001 | 99.8% | $849.10 Million | $851.20 Million | $2.10 Million | ▲ +0.6 pp |
| 2000 | 99.2% | $783.30 Million | $790.00 Million | $6.70 Million | ▼ -0.5 pp |
| 1999 | 99.6% | $713.00 Million | $715.60 Million | $2.60 Million | ▲ +0.1 pp |
| 1998 | 99.5% | $677.00 Million | $680.40 Million | $3.40 Million | ▲ +4.8 pp |
| 1997 | 94.7% | $554.20 Million | $585.50 Million | $31.30 Million | ▲ +2.8 pp |
| 1996 | 91.8% | $441.80 Million | $481.20 Million | $39.40 Million | ▲ +3.4 pp |
| 1995 | 88.4% | $339.00 Million | $383.60 Million | $44.60 Million | — |