Stewart Information Services Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Stewart Information Services Corp cash flow-to-debt ratio. Stewart Information Services Corp (STC) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.06x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $89.54 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($1.60 Billion) in one year. Check Stewart Information Services Corp (STC) cash flow quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Stewart Information Services Corp (1987–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Stewart Information Services Corp from 1987 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Stewart Information Services Corp across 39 annual periods. Check Stewart Information Services Corp cash flow reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Stewart Information Services Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1987–2025)
Stewart Information Services Corp cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1987 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Stewart Information Services Corp. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Stewart Information Services Corp operating cash flow efficiency.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.13x | $205.69 Million | $1.60 Billion | ▲ +24.9% |
| 2024 | 0.10x | $135.61 Million | $1.32 Billion | ▲ +64.0% |
| 2023 | 0.06x | $83.04 Million | $1.32 Billion | ▼ -55.3% |
| 2022 | 0.14x | $191.86 Million | $1.37 Billion | ▼ -75.5% |
| 2021 | 0.57x | $390.29 Million | $681.69 Million | ▲ +100.6% |
| 2020 | 0.29x | $275.81 Million | $966.17 Million | ▲ +44.0% |
| 2019 | 0.20x | $166.36 Million | $839.03 Million | ▲ +63.3% |
| 2018 | 0.12x | $84.18 Million | $693.10 Million | ▼ -18.3% |
| 2017 | 0.15x | $108.07 Million | $727.08 Million | ▼ -16.2% |
| 2016 | 0.18x | $122.96 Million | $692.88 Million | ▲ +50.9% |
| 2015 | 0.12x | $80.51 Million | $684.46 Million | ▲ +27.2% |
| 2014 | 0.09x | $63.99 Million | $692.02 Million | ▼ -29.7% |
| 2013 | 0.13x | $87.19 Million | $662.97 Million | ▼ -22.4% |
| 2012 | 0.17x | $120.52 Million | $711.00 Million | ▲ +401.6% |
| 2011 | 0.03x | $23.41 Million | $692.68 Million | ▼ -43.2% |
| 2010 | 0.06x | $41.19 Million | $692.87 Million | ▲ +418.1% |
| 2009 | -0.02x | $-16.95 Million | $907.09 Million | ▲ +83.3% |
| 2008 | -0.11x | $-105.16 Million | $942.16 Million | ▼ -1738.9% |
| 2007 | 0.01x | $4.58 Million | $672.21 Million | ▼ -95.6% |
| 2006 | 0.16x | $99.73 Million | $638.67 Million | ▼ -48.1% |
| 2005 | 0.30x | $173.51 Million | $576.16 Million | ▼ -14.9% |
| 2004 | 0.35x | $170.41 Million | $481.56 Million | ▼ -27.5% |
| 2003 | 0.49x | $193.94 Million | $397.26 Million | ▲ +1.4% |
| 2002 | 0.48x | $162.55 Million | $337.79 Million | ▲ +21.9% |
| 2001 | 0.39x | $108.19 Million | $274.09 Million | ▲ +223.4% |
| 2000 | 0.12x | $31.91 Million | $261.46 Million | ▼ -48.5% |
| 1999 | 0.24x | $57.88 Million | $244.14 Million | ▼ -36.2% |
| 1998 | 0.37x | $86.47 Million | $232.53 Million | ▲ +124.0% |
| 1997 | 0.17x | $33.83 Million | $203.79 Million | ▼ -15.0% |
| 1996 | 0.20x | $36.75 Million | $188.11 Million | ▲ +63.3% |
| 1995 | 0.12x | $20.57 Million | $171.94 Million | ▼ -29.6% |
| 1994 | 0.17x | $27.90 Million | $164.10 Million | ▼ -52.4% |
| 1993 | 0.36x | $54.50 Million | $152.60 Million | ▲ +17.1% |
| 1992 | 0.31x | $36.30 Million | $119.00 Million | ▲ +65.1% |
| 1991 | 0.18x | $18.60 Million | $100.70 Million | ▲ +40.4% |
| 1990 | 0.13x | $11.00 Million | $83.60 Million | ▼ -11.3% |
| 1989 | 0.15x | $11.70 Million | $78.90 Million | ▲ +28.5% |
| 1988 | 0.12x | $8.90 Million | $77.10 Million | ▼ -28.2% |
| 1987 | 0.16x | $10.80 Million | $67.20 Million | — |