Stewart Information Services Corp (STC) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Stewart Information Services Corp (STC) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.06x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $89.54 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($1.60 Billion) in one year. Explore STC long-term investments to assets to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Stewart Information Services Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1987–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Stewart Information Services Corp across 39 annual periods. Also explore balance sheet size of Stewart Information Services Corp for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Stewart Information Services Corp (1987–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Stewart Information Services Corp. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see market cap of Stewart Information Services Corp.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.13x | $205.69 Million | $1.60 Billion | ▲ +24.9% |
| 2024 | 0.10x | $135.61 Million | $1.32 Billion | ▲ +64.0% |
| 2023 | 0.06x | $83.04 Million | $1.32 Billion | ▼ -55.3% |
| 2022 | 0.14x | $191.86 Million | $1.37 Billion | ▼ -75.5% |
| 2021 | 0.57x | $390.29 Million | $681.69 Million | ▲ +100.6% |
| 2020 | 0.29x | $275.81 Million | $966.17 Million | ▲ +44.0% |
| 2019 | 0.20x | $166.36 Million | $839.03 Million | ▲ +63.3% |
| 2018 | 0.12x | $84.18 Million | $693.10 Million | ▼ -18.3% |
| 2017 | 0.15x | $108.07 Million | $727.08 Million | ▼ -16.2% |
| 2016 | 0.18x | $122.96 Million | $692.88 Million | ▲ +50.9% |
| 2015 | 0.12x | $80.51 Million | $684.46 Million | ▲ +27.2% |
| 2014 | 0.09x | $63.99 Million | $692.02 Million | ▼ -29.7% |
| 2013 | 0.13x | $87.19 Million | $662.97 Million | ▼ -22.4% |
| 2012 | 0.17x | $120.52 Million | $711.00 Million | ▲ +401.6% |
| 2011 | 0.03x | $23.41 Million | $692.68 Million | ▼ -43.2% |
| 2010 | 0.06x | $41.19 Million | $692.87 Million | ▲ +418.1% |
| 2009 | -0.02x | $-16.95 Million | $907.09 Million | ▲ +83.3% |
| 2008 | -0.11x | $-105.16 Million | $942.16 Million | ▼ -1738.9% |
| 2007 | 0.01x | $4.58 Million | $672.21 Million | ▼ -95.6% |
| 2006 | 0.16x | $99.73 Million | $638.67 Million | ▼ -48.1% |
| 2005 | 0.30x | $173.51 Million | $576.16 Million | ▼ -14.9% |
| 2004 | 0.35x | $170.41 Million | $481.56 Million | ▼ -27.5% |
| 2003 | 0.49x | $193.94 Million | $397.26 Million | ▲ +1.4% |
| 2002 | 0.48x | $162.55 Million | $337.79 Million | ▲ +21.9% |
| 2001 | 0.39x | $108.19 Million | $274.09 Million | ▲ +223.4% |
| 2000 | 0.12x | $31.91 Million | $261.46 Million | ▼ -48.5% |
| 1999 | 0.24x | $57.88 Million | $244.14 Million | ▼ -36.2% |
| 1998 | 0.37x | $86.47 Million | $232.53 Million | ▲ +124.0% |
| 1997 | 0.17x | $33.83 Million | $203.79 Million | ▼ -15.0% |
| 1996 | 0.20x | $36.75 Million | $188.11 Million | ▲ +63.3% |
| 1995 | 0.12x | $20.57 Million | $171.94 Million | ▼ -29.6% |
| 1994 | 0.17x | $27.90 Million | $164.10 Million | ▼ -52.4% |
| 1993 | 0.36x | $54.50 Million | $152.60 Million | ▲ +17.1% |
| 1992 | 0.31x | $36.30 Million | $119.00 Million | ▲ +65.1% |
| 1991 | 0.18x | $18.60 Million | $100.70 Million | ▲ +40.4% |
| 1990 | 0.13x | $11.00 Million | $83.60 Million | ▼ -11.3% |
| 1989 | 0.15x | $11.70 Million | $78.90 Million | ▲ +28.5% |
| 1988 | 0.12x | $8.90 Million | $77.10 Million | ▼ -28.2% |
| 1987 | 0.16x | $10.80 Million | $67.20 Million | — |