Terex Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Terex Corporation cash flow-to-debt ratio. Terex Corporation (TEX) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.02x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $128.00 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($5.42 Billion) in one year. Check TEX operating cash flow to net income to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Terex Corporation (1990–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Terex Corporation from 1990 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Terex Corporation across 36 annual periods. Check TEX cash reinvestment to operating cash ratio to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Terex Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1990–2025)
Terex Corporation cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1990 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Terex Corporation. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Terex Corporation cash conversion from operations.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.11x | $440.00 Million | $4.04 Billion | ▲ +30.1% |
| 2024 | 0.08x | $326.00 Million | $3.90 Billion | ▼ -64.6% |
| 2023 | 0.24x | $459.30 Million | $1.94 Billion | ▲ +75.3% |
| 2022 | 0.13x | $261.20 Million | $1.94 Billion | ▼ -19.4% |
| 2021 | 0.17x | $293.40 Million | $1.75 Billion | ▲ +56.6% |
| 2020 | 0.11x | $225.40 Million | $2.11 Billion | ▲ +39.4% |
| 2019 | 0.08x | $173.40 Million | $2.26 Billion | ▲ +113.5% |
| 2018 | 0.04x | $94.20 Million | $2.62 Billion | ▼ -47.5% |
| 2017 | 0.07x | $153.00 Million | $2.24 Billion | ▼ -36.9% |
| 2016 | 0.11x | $377.10 Million | $3.49 Billion | ▲ +89.3% |
| 2015 | 0.06x | $212.90 Million | $3.73 Billion | ▼ -45.9% |
| 2014 | 0.11x | $410.70 Million | $3.89 Billion | ▲ +142.1% |
| 2013 | 0.04x | $188.50 Million | $4.32 Billion | ▼ -29.6% |
| 2012 | 0.06x | $292.30 Million | $4.72 Billion | ▲ +1485.0% |
| 2011 | 0.00x | $19.10 Million | $4.89 Billion | ▲ +102.0% |
| 2010 | -0.19x | $-663.20 Million | $3.40 Billion | ▼ -1986.9% |
| 2009 | -0.01x | $-37.70 Million | $4.04 Billion | ▼ -118.9% |
| 2008 | 0.05x | $183.70 Million | $3.72 Billion | ▼ -45.8% |
| 2007 | 0.09x | $361.40 Million | $3.97 Billion | ▼ -43.0% |
| 2006 | 0.16x | $484.40 Million | $3.03 Billion | ▲ +77.4% |
| 2005 | 0.09x | $273.40 Million | $3.04 Billion | ▲ +66.4% |
| 2004 | 0.05x | $164.60 Million | $3.04 Billion | ▼ -59.9% |
| 2003 | 0.13x | $384.10 Million | $2.85 Billion | ▲ +448.2% |
| 2002 | 0.02x | $70.30 Million | $2.86 Billion | ▲ +901.7% |
| 2001 | 0.00x | $-5.50 Million | $1.79 Billion | ▼ -102.3% |
| 2000 | 0.13x | $200.60 Million | $1.53 Billion | ▲ +4468.4% |
| 1999 | 0.00x | $5.00 Million | $1.74 Billion | ▲ +115.5% |
| 1998 | -0.02x | $-19.50 Million | $1.05 Billion | ▼ -3160.8% |
| 1997 | 0.00x | $-300.00K | $528.30 Million | ▲ +98.4% |
| 1996 | -0.04x | $-17.60 Million | $486.70 Million | ▼ -14.2% |
| 1995 | -0.03x | $-21.90 Million | $691.70 Million | ▼ -51.4% |
| 1994 | -0.02x | $-9.20 Million | $440.00 Million | ▲ +80.0% |
| 1993 | -0.10x | $-46.20 Million | $442.50 Million | ▼ -1661.6% |
| 1992 | 0.01x | $5.10 Million | $762.80 Million | ▼ -47.2% |
| 1991 | 0.01x | $6.30 Million | $497.50 Million | ▲ +142.1% |
| 1990 | -0.03x | $-17.80 Million | $591.30 Million | — |