Terex Corporation (TEX) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Terex Corporation (TEX) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.01x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-31.00 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($5.37 Billion) in one year. See Terex Corporation free cash flow efficiency to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Terex Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1990–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Terex Corporation across 36 annual periods. Also explore Terex Corporation (TEX) equity growth momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Terex Corporation (1990–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Terex Corporation. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see TEX company net worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.11x | $440.00 Million | $4.04 Billion | ▲ +30.1% |
| 2024 | 0.08x | $326.00 Million | $3.90 Billion | ▼ -64.6% |
| 2023 | 0.24x | $459.30 Million | $1.94 Billion | ▲ +75.3% |
| 2022 | 0.13x | $261.20 Million | $1.94 Billion | ▼ -19.4% |
| 2021 | 0.17x | $293.40 Million | $1.75 Billion | ▲ +56.6% |
| 2020 | 0.11x | $225.40 Million | $2.11 Billion | ▲ +39.4% |
| 2019 | 0.08x | $173.40 Million | $2.26 Billion | ▲ +113.5% |
| 2018 | 0.04x | $94.20 Million | $2.62 Billion | ▼ -47.5% |
| 2017 | 0.07x | $153.00 Million | $2.24 Billion | ▼ -36.9% |
| 2016 | 0.11x | $377.10 Million | $3.49 Billion | ▲ +89.3% |
| 2015 | 0.06x | $212.90 Million | $3.73 Billion | ▼ -45.9% |
| 2014 | 0.11x | $410.70 Million | $3.89 Billion | ▲ +142.1% |
| 2013 | 0.04x | $188.50 Million | $4.32 Billion | ▼ -29.6% |
| 2012 | 0.06x | $292.30 Million | $4.72 Billion | ▲ +1485.0% |
| 2011 | 0.00x | $19.10 Million | $4.89 Billion | ▲ +102.0% |
| 2010 | -0.19x | $-663.20 Million | $3.40 Billion | ▼ -1986.9% |
| 2009 | -0.01x | $-37.70 Million | $4.04 Billion | ▼ -118.9% |
| 2008 | 0.05x | $183.70 Million | $3.72 Billion | ▼ -45.8% |
| 2007 | 0.09x | $361.40 Million | $3.97 Billion | ▼ -43.0% |
| 2006 | 0.16x | $484.40 Million | $3.03 Billion | ▲ +77.4% |
| 2005 | 0.09x | $273.40 Million | $3.04 Billion | ▲ +66.4% |
| 2004 | 0.05x | $164.60 Million | $3.04 Billion | ▼ -59.9% |
| 2003 | 0.13x | $384.10 Million | $2.85 Billion | ▲ +448.2% |
| 2002 | 0.02x | $70.30 Million | $2.86 Billion | ▲ +901.7% |
| 2001 | 0.00x | $-5.50 Million | $1.79 Billion | ▼ -102.3% |
| 2000 | 0.13x | $200.60 Million | $1.53 Billion | ▲ +4468.4% |
| 1999 | 0.00x | $5.00 Million | $1.74 Billion | ▲ +115.5% |
| 1998 | -0.02x | $-19.50 Million | $1.05 Billion | ▼ -3160.8% |
| 1997 | 0.00x | $-300.00K | $528.30 Million | ▲ +98.4% |
| 1996 | -0.04x | $-17.60 Million | $486.70 Million | ▼ -14.2% |
| 1995 | -0.03x | $-21.90 Million | $691.70 Million | ▼ -51.4% |
| 1994 | -0.02x | $-9.20 Million | $440.00 Million | ▲ +80.0% |
| 1993 | -0.10x | $-46.20 Million | $442.50 Million | ▼ -1661.6% |
| 1992 | 0.01x | $5.10 Million | $762.80 Million | ▼ -47.2% |
| 1991 | 0.01x | $6.30 Million | $497.50 Million | ▲ +142.1% |
| 1990 | -0.03x | $-17.80 Million | $591.30 Million | — |