Yum! Brands Inc (YUM) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Yum! Brands Inc (YUM) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.03x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $416.00 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($15.49 Billion) in one year. Explore long-term investment intensity of Yum! Brands Inc to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Yum! Brands Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1997–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Yum! Brands Inc across 29 annual periods. Also explore total assets of Yum! Brands Inc for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Yum! Brands Inc (1997–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Yum! Brands Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see YUM market cap overview.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.13x | $2.01 Billion | $15.52 Billion | ▲ +10.2% |
| 2024 | 0.12x | $1.69 Billion | $14.38 Billion | ▲ +3.3% |
| 2023 | 0.11x | $1.60 Billion | $14.09 Billion | ▲ +17.4% |
| 2022 | 0.10x | $1.43 Billion | $14.72 Billion | ▼ -18.5% |
| 2021 | 0.12x | $1.71 Billion | $14.34 Billion | ▲ +25.3% |
| 2020 | 0.09x | $1.30 Billion | $13.74 Billion | ▼ -4.3% |
| 2019 | 0.10x | $1.31 Billion | $13.25 Billion | ▲ +1.8% |
| 2018 | 0.10x | $1.18 Billion | $12.06 Billion | ▲ +10.3% |
| 2017 | 0.09x | $1.03 Billion | $11.64 Billion | ▼ -21.1% |
| 2016 | 0.11x | $1.25 Billion | $11.13 Billion | ▼ -62.8% |
| 2015 | 0.30x | $2.14 Billion | $7.11 Billion | ▼ -1.0% |
| 2014 | 0.30x | $2.05 Billion | $6.74 Billion | ▼ -8.1% |
| 2013 | 0.33x | $2.14 Billion | $6.47 Billion | ▼ -2.5% |
| 2012 | 0.34x | $2.29 Billion | $6.76 Billion | ▲ +8.2% |
| 2011 | 0.31x | $2.17 Billion | $6.92 Billion | ▲ +5.9% |
| 2010 | 0.30x | $1.97 Billion | $6.65 Billion | ▲ +27.2% |
| 2009 | 0.23x | $1.40 Billion | $6.03 Billion | ▲ +4.8% |
| 2008 | 0.22x | $1.47 Billion | $6.62 Billion | ▼ -13.5% |
| 2007 | 0.26x | $1.57 Billion | $6.10 Billion | ▼ -3.1% |
| 2006 | 0.26x | $1.30 Billion | $4.92 Billion | ▼ -11.5% |
| 2005 | 0.30x | $1.27 Billion | $4.25 Billion | ▲ +8.5% |
| 2004 | 0.28x | $1.13 Billion | $4.10 Billion | ▲ +17.9% |
| 2003 | 0.23x | $1.05 Billion | $4.50 Billion | ▲ +3.4% |
| 2002 | 0.23x | $1.09 Billion | $4.81 Billion | ▲ +16.6% |
| 2001 | 0.19x | $832.00 Million | $4.28 Billion | ▲ +76.8% |
| 2000 | 0.11x | $491.00 Million | $4.47 Billion | ▼ -12.1% |
| 1999 | 0.12x | $565.00 Million | $4.52 Billion | ▲ +5.6% |
| 1998 | 0.12x | $674.00 Million | $5.69 Billion | ▼ -1.8% |
| 1997 | 0.12x | $810.00 Million | $6.72 Billion | — |