Yum! Brands Inc Strategic Asset Allocation Index
Yum! Brands Inc strategic asset allocation index. Yum! Brands Inc (YUM) has a Strategic Asset Allocation Index of 1974.8% as of March 2016. Strategic assets (PP&E of $4.11 Billion plus long-term investments of $36.00 Million) total $4.15 Billion, measured against net assets of $210.00 Million. A higher index reflects capital-intensive or investment-heavy strategies where strategic assets dominate the equity base. See YUM net asset quality score to measure how much of total assets are equity-financed.
SAAI
Strategic Assets
PP&E
Net Assets
Strategic Asset Allocation Index of Yum! Brands Inc (2001–2015)
Strategic asset allocation index of Yum! Brands Inc from 2001 to 2015. This chart shows how Yum! Brands Inc's Strategic Asset Allocation Index has evolved across 14 annual periods from 2001 to 2015. As of March 2016, the index stands at 1974.8%, representing strategic assets of $4.15 Billion against net assets of $210.00 Million USD. Check Yum! Brands Inc tangible net worth ratio to evaluate the tangible quality of the company's equity base.
Yum! Brands Inc Strategic Asset Allocation Index by Year (2001–2015)
Yum! Brands Inc strategic asset allocation index by year from 2001 to 2015. The table below presents the year-by-year Strategic Asset Allocation Index for Yum! Brands Inc from 2001 to 2015, covering 14 annual filings. Each row shows PP&E, long-term investments, strategic assets combined, net assets, the index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For live market cap and overall valuation, see YUM market cap.
| Year | SAAI | Strategic Assets (USD) | PP&E | LT Investments | Net Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 438.6% | $4.25 Billion | $4.19 Billion | $61.00 Million | $969.00 Million | ▲ +154.9 pp |
| 2014 | 283.7% | $4.55 Billion | $4.50 Billion | $52.00 Million | $1.60 Billion | ▲ +81.2 pp |
| 2013 | 202.4% | $4.51 Billion | $4.46 Billion | $53.00 Million | $2.23 Billion | ▲ +10.6 pp |
| 2012 | 191.8% | $4.32 Billion | $4.25 Billion | $72.00 Million | $2.25 Billion | ▼ -19.1 pp |
| 2011 | 211.0% | $4.04 Billion | $4.04 Billion | $- | $1.92 Billion | ▼ -27.7 pp |
| 2010 | 238.7% | $3.98 Billion | $3.83 Billion | $154.00 Million | $1.67 Billion | ▼ -111.3 pp |
| 2009 | 350.0% | $3.90 Billion | $3.90 Billion | $- | $1.11 Billion | ▲ +12.1 pp |
| 2007 | 337.9% | $3.85 Billion | $3.85 Billion | $- | $1.14 Billion | ▲ +85.2 pp |
| 2006 | 252.7% | $3.63 Billion | $3.63 Billion | $- | $1.44 Billion | ▲ +21.1 pp |
| 2005 | 231.6% | $3.36 Billion | $3.36 Billion | $- | $1.45 Billion | ▲ +16.0 pp |
| 2004 | 215.6% | $3.44 Billion | $3.44 Billion | $- | $1.59 Billion | ▼ -77.2 pp |
| 2003 | 292.9% | $3.28 Billion | $3.28 Billion | $- | $1.12 Billion | ▼ -218.4 pp |
| 2002 | 511.3% | $3.04 Billion | $3.04 Billion | $- | $594.00 Million | ▼ -2158.9 pp |
| 2001 | 2670.2% | $2.78 Billion | $2.78 Billion | $- | $104.00 Million | — |