Yum! Brands Inc (YUM) — Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Yum! Brands Inc (YUM) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of -26.2% as of March 2016. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets ($265.00 Million) from net assets ($210.00 Million) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. See YUM book value for net asset value and shareholders' equity analysis.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Yum! Brands Inc Tangible Net Worth Ratio (2001–2015)
This chart shows how Yum! Brands Inc's Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 14 annual periods from 2001 to 2015. As of March 2016, the ratio stands at -26.2%, reflecting net assets of $210.00 Million with intangible assets of $265.00 Million USD. Also explore YUM shareholders equity momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Yum! Brands Inc (2001–2015)
The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Yum! Brands Inc from 2001 to 2015, covering 14 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. For the full company profile including market capitalisation, see Yum! Brands Inc stock valuation.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (USD) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 72.0% | $969.00 Million | $271.00 Million | $8.07 Billion | ▼ -8.1 pp |
| 2014 | 80.2% | $1.60 Billion | $318.00 Million | $8.35 Billion | ▲ +8.8 pp |
| 2013 | 71.4% | $2.23 Billion | $638.00 Million | $8.70 Billion | ▲ +2.0 pp |
| 2012 | 69.4% | $2.25 Billion | $690.00 Million | $9.01 Billion | ▼ -15.0 pp |
| 2011 | 84.4% | $1.92 Billion | $299.00 Million | $8.83 Billion | ▲ +12.9 pp |
| 2010 | 71.5% | $1.67 Billion | $475.00 Million | $8.32 Billion | ▲ +13.0 pp |
| 2009 | 58.5% | $1.11 Billion | $462.00 Million | $7.15 Billion | ▼ -12.2 pp |
| 2007 | 70.8% | $1.14 Billion | $333.00 Million | $7.24 Billion | ▼ -5.1 pp |
| 2006 | 75.9% | $1.44 Billion | $347.00 Million | $6.35 Billion | ▼ -1.4 pp |
| 2005 | 77.2% | $1.45 Billion | $330.00 Million | $5.70 Billion | ▼ -1.0 pp |
| 2004 | 78.2% | $1.59 Billion | $347.00 Million | $5.70 Billion | ▲ +56.6 pp |
| 2003 | 21.6% | $1.12 Billion | $878.00 Million | $5.62 Billion | ▲ +64.5 pp |
| 2002 | -42.9% | $594.00 Million | $849.00 Million | $5.40 Billion | ▲ +297.5 pp |
| 2001 | -340.4% | $104.00 Million | $458.00 Million | $4.39 Billion | — |