Usinas Siderúrgicas de Minas Gerais S.A Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Usinas Siderúrgicas de Minas Gerais S.A cash flow-to-debt ratio. Usinas Siderúrgicas de Minas Gerais S.A (USIM3) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.03x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of R$357.90 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (R$11.46 Billion) in one year. Check USIM3 total capital reinvestment ratio to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Usinas Siderúrgicas de Minas Gerais S.A (2002–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Usinas Siderúrgicas de Minas Gerais S.A from 2002 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Usinas Siderúrgicas de Minas Gerais S.A across 24 annual periods. Check earnings quality score of Usinas Siderúrgicas de Minas Gerais S.A to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
Usinas Siderúrgicas de Minas Gerais S.A Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (2002–2025)
Usinas Siderúrgicas de Minas Gerais S.A cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 2002 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Usinas Siderúrgicas de Minas Gerais S.A. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Usinas Siderúrgicas de Minas Gerais S.A operating cash flow efficiency.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (BRL) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.19x | R$2.33 Billion | R$11.98 Billion | ▲ +159.0% |
| 2024 | 0.08x | R$989.16 Million | R$13.19 Billion | ▼ -77.6% |
| 2023 | 0.34x | R$4.57 Billion | R$13.61 Billion | ▲ +375.0% |
| 2022 | 0.07x | R$997.12 Million | R$14.11 Billion | ▼ -79.8% |
| 2021 | 0.35x | R$5.30 Billion | R$15.12 Billion | ▲ +22.2% |
| 2020 | 0.29x | R$3.76 Billion | R$13.11 Billion | ▲ +56.6% |
| 2019 | 0.18x | R$1.97 Billion | R$10.77 Billion | ▲ +288.9% |
| 2018 | 0.05x | R$509.62 Million | R$10.83 Billion | ▼ -42.0% |
| 2017 | 0.08x | R$877.03 Million | R$10.80 Billion | ▲ +389.5% |
| 2016 | -0.03x | R$-310.31 Million | R$11.06 Billion | ▼ -446.2% |
| 2015 | 0.01x | R$103.41 Million | R$12.76 Billion | ▼ -93.3% |
| 2014 | 0.12x | R$1.41 Billion | R$11.72 Billion | ▲ +36.3% |
| 2013 | 0.09x | R$1.11 Billion | R$12.52 Billion | ▼ -48.4% |
| 2012 | 0.17x | R$2.44 Billion | R$14.26 Billion | ▲ +621.5% |
| 2011 | -0.03x | R$-470.63 Million | R$14.35 Billion | ▼ -131.0% |
| 2010 | 0.11x | R$1.35 Billion | R$12.76 Billion | ▼ -55.1% |
| 2009 | 0.24x | R$2.34 Billion | R$9.94 Billion | ▲ +62.7% |
| 2008 | 0.14x | R$1.80 Billion | R$12.46 Billion | ▼ -71.2% |
| 2007 | 0.50x | R$4.07 Billion | R$8.11 Billion | ▲ +19.6% |
| 2006 | 0.42x | R$3.55 Billion | R$8.46 Billion | ▲ +3.0% |
| 2005 | 0.41x | R$3.81 Billion | R$9.36 Billion | ▼ -3.1% |
| 2004 | 0.42x | R$4.54 Billion | R$10.81 Billion | ▲ +95.9% |
| 2003 | 0.21x | R$2.46 Billion | R$11.46 Billion | ▲ +51.7% |
| 2002 | 0.14x | R$1.75 Billion | R$12.40 Billion | — |