GZ Port (601228) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio

Latest as of September 2025: 0.01x

GZ Port (601228) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.01x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CN¥242.97 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CN¥28.08 Billion) in one year. Check 601228 capex plus investments ratio to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.

CF-to-Debt Ratio

0.01x
Operating CF / Total Liabilities

Operating Cash Flow

CN¥242.97 Million
CNY

Total Liabilities

CN¥28.08 Billion
CNY

Data as of

Sep 2025
Most recent filing

GZ Port Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2009–2025)

Historical debt coverage capacity for GZ Port across 17 annual periods. Also explore GZ Port balance sheet assets for the complete picture of this company's asset base.

Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for GZ Port (2009–2025)

Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for GZ Port. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see GZ Port market cap and net worth.

Year CF-to-Debt Ratio Operating CF (CNY) Total Liabilities YoY Change
2025 0.08x CN¥2.36 Billion CN¥29.08 Billion ▼ -11.4%
2024 0.09x CN¥2.54 Billion CN¥27.72 Billion ▼ -0.8%
2023 0.09x CN¥2.39 Billion CN¥25.82 Billion ▲ +19.8%
2022 0.08x CN¥1.93 Billion CN¥25.07 Billion ▼ -14.3%
2021 0.09x CN¥2.00 Billion CN¥22.21 Billion ▼ -35.9%
2020 0.14x CN¥2.40 Billion CN¥17.11 Billion ▼ -32.2%
2019 0.21x CN¥2.66 Billion CN¥12.84 Billion ▼ -38.5%
2018 0.34x CN¥3.42 Billion CN¥10.16 Billion ▲ +91.1%
2017 0.18x CN¥1.48 Billion CN¥8.42 Billion ▲ +53.6%
2016 0.11x CN¥1.10 Billion CN¥9.60 Billion ▲ +52.9%
2015 0.07x CN¥684.24 Million CN¥9.13 Billion ▼ -54.5%
2014 0.16x CN¥1.31 Billion CN¥7.96 Billion ▼ -14.0%
2013 0.19x CN¥1.08 Billion CN¥5.63 Billion ▲ +15.0%
2012 0.17x CN¥930.39 Million CN¥5.59 Billion ▼ -21.3%
2011 0.21x CN¥1.13 Billion CN¥5.35 Billion ▲ +13.0%
2010 0.19x CN¥1.12 Billion CN¥6.01 Billion ▼ -30.9%
2009 0.27x CN¥1.33 Billion CN¥4.92 Billion
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio = Operating Cash Flow / Total Liabilities. Higher is better for debt service capacity.