AB Electrolux (publ) (ELUX-B) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
AB Electrolux (publ) (ELUX-B) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.05x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of Skr-4.83 Billion could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (Skr105.66 Billion) in one year. See AB Electrolux (publ) free cash flow generation to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
AB Electrolux (publ) Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1991–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for AB Electrolux (publ) across 35 annual periods. Also explore how fast is AB Electrolux (publ) growing its equity to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for AB Electrolux (publ) (1991–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for AB Electrolux (publ). For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see market value of AB Electrolux (publ).
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (SEK) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.01x | Skr1.19 Billion | Skr105.92 Billion | ▼ -69.0% |
| 2024 | 0.04x | Skr4.20 Billion | Skr115.67 Billion | ▼ -1.4% |
| 2023 | 0.04x | Skr4.00 Billion | Skr108.78 Billion | ▲ +279.1% |
| 2022 | -0.02x | Skr-2.27 Billion | Skr110.65 Billion | ▼ -125.9% |
| 2021 | 0.08x | Skr7.06 Billion | Skr89.00 Billion | ▼ -46.2% |
| 2020 | 0.15x | Skr11.93 Billion | Skr80.89 Billion | ▲ +47.3% |
| 2019 | 0.10x | Skr8.43 Billion | Skr84.23 Billion | ▼ -6.0% |
| 2018 | 0.11x | Skr8.05 Billion | Skr75.56 Billion | ▼ -26.6% |
| 2017 | 0.15x | Skr10.02 Billion | Skr69.08 Billion | ▼ -2.8% |
| 2016 | 0.15x | Skr10.16 Billion | Skr68.11 Billion | ▲ +23.6% |
| 2015 | 0.12x | Skr8.27 Billion | Skr68.47 Billion | ▲ +6.9% |
| 2014 | 0.11x | Skr7.82 Billion | Skr69.22 Billion | ▲ +56.5% |
| 2013 | 0.07x | Skr4.46 Billion | Skr61.69 Billion | ▼ -43.2% |
| 2012 | 0.13x | Skr7.16 Billion | Skr56.33 Billion | ▲ +31.1% |
| 2011 | 0.10x | Skr5.40 Billion | Skr55.74 Billion | ▼ -33.3% |
| 2010 | 0.15x | Skr7.68 Billion | Skr52.91 Billion | ▼ -5.8% |
| 2009 | 0.15x | Skr8.30 Billion | Skr53.85 Billion | ▲ +77.2% |
| 2008 | 0.09x | Skr4.95 Billion | Skr56.94 Billion | ▼ -18.6% |
| 2007 | 0.11x | Skr5.35 Billion | Skr50.05 Billion | ▲ +23.8% |
| 2006 | 0.09x | Skr4.56 Billion | Skr52.85 Billion | ▼ -25.2% |
| 2005 | 0.12x | Skr6.54 Billion | Skr56.67 Billion | ▼ -30.8% |
| 2004 | 0.17x | Skr8.64 Billion | Skr51.85 Billion | ▲ +31.2% |
| 2003 | 0.13x | Skr6.29 Billion | Skr49.50 Billion | ▼ -33.3% |
| 2002 | 0.19x | Skr10.92 Billion | Skr57.33 Billion | ▲ +30.3% |
| 2001 | 0.15x | Skr9.48 Billion | Skr64.85 Billion | ▲ +44.2% |
| 2000 | 0.10x | Skr6.14 Billion | Skr60.59 Billion | ▼ -35.6% |
| 1999 | 0.16x | Skr8.65 Billion | Skr54.98 Billion | ▲ +93.8% |
| 1998 | 0.08x | Skr4.70 Billion | Skr57.90 Billion | ▼ -54.6% |
| 1997 | 0.18x | Skr8.69 Billion | Skr48.61 Billion | ▲ +175.1% |
| 1996 | 0.06x | Skr3.97 Billion | Skr61.16 Billion | ▲ +4.1% |
| 1995 | 0.06x | Skr3.79 Billion | Skr60.67 Billion | ▼ -37.1% |
| 1994 | 0.10x | Skr6.26 Billion | Skr63.12 Billion | ▼ -7.1% |
| 1993 | 0.11x | Skr6.45 Billion | Skr60.42 Billion | ▲ +38.3% |
| 1992 | 0.08x | Skr4.20 Billion | Skr54.48 Billion | ▼ -35.2% |
| 1991 | 0.12x | Skr5.55 Billion | Skr46.64 Billion | — |