Neto Malinda (NTML) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio

Latest as of March 2026: -0.14x

Neto Malinda (NTML) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.14x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of ILA-143.25 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (ILA1.01 Billion) in one year. Explore investment intensity of Neto Malinda to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.

CF-to-Debt Ratio

-0.14x
Operating CF / Total Liabilities

Operating Cash Flow

ILA-143.25 Million
ILA

Total Liabilities

ILA1.01 Billion
ILA

Data as of

Mar 2026
Most recent filing

Neto Malinda Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2009–2025)

Historical debt coverage capacity for Neto Malinda across 16 annual periods. Also explore Neto Malinda assets under control for the complete picture of this company's asset base.

Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Neto Malinda (2009–2025)

Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Neto Malinda. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Neto Malinda (NTML) market capitalisation.

Year CF-to-Debt Ratio Operating CF (ILA) Total Liabilities YoY Change
2025 -0.07x ILA-59.30 Million ILA832.93 Million ▼ -113.7%
2024 0.52x ILA324.26 Million ILA622.16 Million ▲ +54.3%
2023 0.34x ILA213.01 Million ILA630.65 Million ▲ +426.1%
2022 -0.10x ILA-74.39 Million ILA718.29 Million ▼ -156.7%
2021 0.18x ILA76.97 Million ILA421.72 Million ▼ -27.6%
2020 0.25x ILA97.32 Million ILA386.19 Million ▲ +2.9%
2019 0.24x ILA86.68 Million ILA353.90 Million ▼ -54.8%
2018 0.54x ILA166.97 Million ILA307.95 Million ▲ +4550.7%
2017 0.01x ILA3.83 Million ILA328.52 Million ▼ -91.5%
2016 0.14x ILA40.70 Million ILA298.04 Million ▼ -58.9%
2015 0.33x ILA108.84 Million ILA327.94 Million ▲ +27.8%
2014 0.26x ILA103.38 Million ILA398.05 Million ▲ +2.1%
2013 0.25x ILA120.67 Million ILA474.35 Million ▲ +38.0%
2011 0.18x ILA68.66 Million ILA372.38 Million ▲ +87.1%
2010 0.10x ILA40.40 Million ILA409.98 Million ▼ -24.9%
2009 0.13x ILA51.52 Million ILA392.61 Million —
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio = Operating Cash Flow / Total Liabilities. Higher is better for debt service capacity.