BlackBerry Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
BlackBerry Ltd cash flow-to-debt ratio. BlackBerry Ltd (BB) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.01x as of May 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$4.57 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$488.36 Million) in one year. Check BlackBerry Ltd cash earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of BlackBerry Ltd (1997–2026)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of BlackBerry Ltd from 1997 to 2026. Historical debt coverage capacity for BlackBerry Ltd across 30 annual periods. Check cash flow reinvestment rate of BlackBerry Ltd to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
BlackBerry Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1997–2026)
BlackBerry Ltd cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1997 to 2026. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for BlackBerry Ltd. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see BB cash flow conversion.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.10x | CA$51.13 Million | CA$498.76 Million | ▲ +256.0% |
| 2025 | 0.03x | CA$16.50 Million | CA$572.96 Million | ▲ +694.2% |
| 2024 | 0.00x | CA$-3.00 Million | CA$619.00 Million | ▲ +98.5% |
| 2023 | -0.32x | CA$-263.00 Million | CA$822.00 Million | ▼ -1055.3% |
| 2022 | -0.03x | CA$-28.00 Million | CA$1.01 Billion | ▼ -144.4% |
| 2021 | 0.06x | CA$82.00 Million | CA$1.31 Billion | ▲ +226.2% |
| 2020 | 0.02x | CA$26.00 Million | CA$1.36 Billion | ▼ -75.3% |
| 2019 | 0.08x | CA$100.00 Million | CA$1.29 Billion | ▼ -86.0% |
| 2018 | 0.55x | CA$704.00 Million | CA$1.27 Billion | ▲ +397.3% |
| 2017 | -0.19x | CA$-224.00 Million | CA$1.21 Billion | ▼ -268.1% |
| 2016 | 0.11x | CA$257.00 Million | CA$2.33 Billion | ▼ -57.6% |
| 2015 | 0.26x | CA$813.00 Million | CA$3.12 Billion | ▲ +744.0% |
| 2014 | -0.04x | CA$-159.00 Million | CA$3.93 Billion | ▼ -106.5% |
| 2013 | 0.62x | CA$2.30 Billion | CA$3.71 Billion | ▼ -22.5% |
| 2012 | 0.80x | CA$2.91 Billion | CA$3.63 Billion | ▼ -21.2% |
| 2011 | 1.02x | CA$4.01 Billion | CA$3.94 Billion | ▼ -12.7% |
| 2010 | 1.17x | CA$3.03 Billion | CA$2.60 Billion | ▲ +78.9% |
| 2009 | 0.65x | CA$1.45 Billion | CA$2.23 Billion | ▼ -34.8% |
| 2008 | 1.00x | CA$1.58 Billion | CA$1.58 Billion | ▼ -17.7% |
| 2007 | 1.22x | CA$735.56 Million | CA$605.36 Million | ▲ +153.7% |
| 2006 | 0.48x | CA$149.84 Million | CA$312.87 Million | ▲ +9.8% |
| 2005 | 0.44x | CA$277.98 Million | CA$637.32 Million | ▲ +47.0% |
| 2004 | 0.30x | CA$63.84 Million | CA$215.12 Million | ▲ +1547.3% |
| 2003 | 0.02x | CA$2.79 Million | CA$155.01 Million | ▼ -92.7% |
| 2002 | 0.25x | CA$17.70 Million | CA$71.39 Million | ▲ +223.4% |
| 2001 | 0.08x | CA$5.15 Million | CA$67.13 Million | ▲ +112.6% |
| 2000 | -0.61x | CA$-15.75 Million | CA$25.84 Million | ▼ -465.7% |
| 1999 | 0.17x | CA$1.70 Million | CA$10.21 Million | ▲ +91.7% |
| 1998 | 0.09x | CA$199.56K | CA$2.29 Million | ▲ +101.8% |
| 1997 | -4.92x | CA$-12.93 Million | CA$2.63 Million | — |