BlackBerry Ltd (BB) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
BlackBerry Ltd (BB) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.04x as of November 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$18.20 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$476.25 Million) in one year. Explore BlackBerry Ltd (BB) investment intensity to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
BlackBerry Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1997–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for BlackBerry Ltd across 29 annual periods. Also explore BlackBerry Ltd asset portfolio for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for BlackBerry Ltd (1997–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for BlackBerry Ltd. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see how much is BlackBerry Ltd worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.03x | CA$16.50 Million | CA$572.96 Million | ▲ +694.2% |
| 2024 | 0.00x | CA$-3.00 Million | CA$619.00 Million | ▲ +98.5% |
| 2023 | -0.32x | CA$-263.00 Million | CA$822.00 Million | ▼ -1055.3% |
| 2022 | -0.03x | CA$-28.00 Million | CA$1.01 Billion | ▼ -144.4% |
| 2021 | 0.06x | CA$82.00 Million | CA$1.31 Billion | ▲ +226.2% |
| 2020 | 0.02x | CA$26.00 Million | CA$1.36 Billion | ▼ -75.3% |
| 2019 | 0.08x | CA$100.00 Million | CA$1.29 Billion | ▼ -86.0% |
| 2018 | 0.55x | CA$704.00 Million | CA$1.27 Billion | ▲ +397.3% |
| 2017 | -0.19x | CA$-224.00 Million | CA$1.21 Billion | ▼ -268.1% |
| 2016 | 0.11x | CA$257.00 Million | CA$2.33 Billion | ▼ -57.6% |
| 2015 | 0.26x | CA$813.00 Million | CA$3.12 Billion | ▲ +744.0% |
| 2014 | -0.04x | CA$-159.00 Million | CA$3.93 Billion | ▼ -106.5% |
| 2013 | 0.62x | CA$2.30 Billion | CA$3.71 Billion | ▼ -22.5% |
| 2012 | 0.80x | CA$2.91 Billion | CA$3.63 Billion | ▼ -21.2% |
| 2011 | 1.02x | CA$4.01 Billion | CA$3.94 Billion | ▼ -12.7% |
| 2010 | 1.17x | CA$3.03 Billion | CA$2.60 Billion | ▲ +78.9% |
| 2009 | 0.65x | CA$1.45 Billion | CA$2.23 Billion | ▼ -34.8% |
| 2008 | 1.00x | CA$1.58 Billion | CA$1.58 Billion | ▼ -17.7% |
| 2007 | 1.22x | CA$735.56 Million | CA$605.36 Million | ▲ +153.7% |
| 2006 | 0.48x | CA$149.84 Million | CA$312.87 Million | ▲ +9.8% |
| 2005 | 0.44x | CA$277.98 Million | CA$637.32 Million | ▲ +47.0% |
| 2004 | 0.30x | CA$63.84 Million | CA$215.12 Million | ▲ +1547.3% |
| 2003 | 0.02x | CA$2.79 Million | CA$155.01 Million | ▼ -92.7% |
| 2002 | 0.25x | CA$17.70 Million | CA$71.39 Million | ▲ +223.4% |
| 2001 | 0.08x | CA$5.15 Million | CA$67.13 Million | ▲ +112.6% |
| 2000 | -0.61x | CA$-15.75 Million | CA$25.84 Million | ▼ -465.7% |
| 1999 | 0.17x | CA$1.70 Million | CA$10.21 Million | ▲ +91.7% |
| 1998 | 0.09x | CA$199.56K | CA$2.29 Million | ▲ +101.8% |
| 1997 | -4.92x | CA$-12.93 Million | CA$2.63 Million | — |