Canadian Tire Corporation Limited (CTC) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Canadian Tire Corporation Limited (CTC) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.05x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$798.90 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$14.73 Billion) in one year. See Canadian Tire Corporation Limited (CTC) FCF generation index to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Canadian Tire Corporation Limited Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1995–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Canadian Tire Corporation Limited across 31 annual periods. Also explore net asset momentum of Canadian Tire Corporation Limited to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Canadian Tire Corporation Limited (1995–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Canadian Tire Corporation Limited. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see CTC company net worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.06x | CA$952.10 Million | CA$14.73 Billion | ▼ -52.5% |
| 2024 | 0.14x | CA$2.06 Billion | CA$15.15 Billion | ▲ +56.3% |
| 2023 | 0.09x | CA$1.35 Billion | CA$15.53 Billion | ▲ +181.4% |
| 2022 | 0.03x | CA$466.50 Million | CA$15.06 Billion | ▼ -72.7% |
| 2021 | 0.11x | CA$1.74 Billion | CA$15.29 Billion | ▼ -32.4% |
| 2020 | 0.17x | CA$2.44 Billion | CA$14.54 Billion | ▲ +116.4% |
| 2019 | 0.08x | CA$1.09 Billion | CA$14.01 Billion | ▼ -19.7% |
| 2018 | 0.10x | CA$972.80 Million | CA$10.06 Billion | ▼ -6.2% |
| 2017 | 0.10x | CA$986.40 Million | CA$9.57 Billion | ▲ +0.8% |
| 2016 | 0.10x | CA$978.90 Million | CA$9.57 Billion | ▲ +63.8% |
| 2015 | 0.06x | CA$574.50 Million | CA$9.20 Billion | ▼ -42.8% |
| 2014 | 0.11x | CA$893.00 Million | CA$8.18 Billion | ▲ +23.7% |
| 2013 | 0.09x | CA$743.00 Million | CA$8.42 Billion | ▼ -50.2% |
| 2012 | 0.18x | CA$1.41 Billion | CA$7.93 Billion | ▼ -16.0% |
| 2011 | 0.21x | CA$991.20 Million | CA$4.70 Billion | ▲ +161.2% |
| 2010 | 0.08x | CA$418.80 Million | CA$5.18 Billion | ▲ +87.8% |
| 2009 | 0.04x | CA$181.50 Million | CA$4.22 Billion | ▼ -9.9% |
| 2008 | 0.05x | CA$174.70 Million | CA$3.66 Billion | ▼ -78.9% |
| 2007 | 0.23x | CA$682.50 Million | CA$3.02 Billion | ▲ +71.9% |
| 2006 | 0.13x | CA$413.50 Million | CA$3.14 Billion | ▼ -14.7% |
| 2005 | 0.15x | CA$411.00 Million | CA$2.67 Billion | ▼ -23.9% |
| 2004 | 0.20x | CA$520.10 Million | CA$2.57 Billion | ▲ +26.2% |
| 2003 | 0.16x | CA$444.30 Million | CA$2.77 Billion | ▲ +111.8% |
| 2002 | 0.08x | CA$186.94 Million | CA$2.47 Billion | ▼ -65.5% |
| 2001 | 0.22x | CA$502.34 Million | CA$2.29 Billion | ▲ +71.5% |
| 2000 | 0.13x | CA$323.50 Million | CA$2.53 Billion | ▼ -34.0% |
| 1999 | 0.19x | CA$369.40 Million | CA$1.90 Billion | ▲ +51.4% |
| 1998 | 0.13x | CA$202.00 Million | CA$1.58 Billion | ▼ -28.7% |
| 1997 | 0.18x | CA$234.40 Million | CA$1.30 Billion | ▼ -0.1% |
| 1996 | 0.18x | CA$234.60 Million | CA$1.30 Billion | ▲ +279.5% |
| 1995 | 0.05x | CA$68.00 Million | CA$1.44 Billion | — |