Canadian Tire Corporation Limited (CTC) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Canadian Tire Corporation Limited (CTC) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.05x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$798.90 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$14.73 Billion) in one year. See Canadian Tire Corporation Limited (CTC) flexibility index to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Canadian Tire Corporation Limited Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1995–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Canadian Tire Corporation Limited across 31 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see how efficiently does Canadian Tire Corporation Limited generate cash.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Canadian Tire Corporation Limited (1995–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Canadian Tire Corporation Limited. Check Canadian Tire Corporation Limited cash earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.06x | CA$952.10 Million | CA$14.73 Billion | ▼ -52.5% |
| 2024 | 0.14x | CA$2.06 Billion | CA$15.15 Billion | ▲ +56.3% |
| 2023 | 0.09x | CA$1.35 Billion | CA$15.53 Billion | ▲ +181.4% |
| 2022 | 0.03x | CA$466.50 Million | CA$15.06 Billion | ▼ -72.7% |
| 2021 | 0.11x | CA$1.74 Billion | CA$15.29 Billion | ▼ -32.4% |
| 2020 | 0.17x | CA$2.44 Billion | CA$14.54 Billion | ▲ +116.4% |
| 2019 | 0.08x | CA$1.09 Billion | CA$14.01 Billion | ▼ -19.7% |
| 2018 | 0.10x | CA$972.80 Million | CA$10.06 Billion | ▼ -6.2% |
| 2017 | 0.10x | CA$986.40 Million | CA$9.57 Billion | ▲ +0.8% |
| 2016 | 0.10x | CA$978.90 Million | CA$9.57 Billion | ▲ +63.8% |
| 2015 | 0.06x | CA$574.50 Million | CA$9.20 Billion | ▼ -42.8% |
| 2014 | 0.11x | CA$893.00 Million | CA$8.18 Billion | ▲ +23.7% |
| 2013 | 0.09x | CA$743.00 Million | CA$8.42 Billion | ▼ -50.2% |
| 2012 | 0.18x | CA$1.41 Billion | CA$7.93 Billion | ▼ -16.0% |
| 2011 | 0.21x | CA$991.20 Million | CA$4.70 Billion | ▲ +161.2% |
| 2010 | 0.08x | CA$418.80 Million | CA$5.18 Billion | ▲ +87.8% |
| 2009 | 0.04x | CA$181.50 Million | CA$4.22 Billion | ▼ -9.9% |
| 2008 | 0.05x | CA$174.70 Million | CA$3.66 Billion | ▼ -78.9% |
| 2007 | 0.23x | CA$682.50 Million | CA$3.02 Billion | ▲ +71.9% |
| 2006 | 0.13x | CA$413.50 Million | CA$3.14 Billion | ▼ -14.7% |
| 2005 | 0.15x | CA$411.00 Million | CA$2.67 Billion | ▼ -23.9% |
| 2004 | 0.20x | CA$520.10 Million | CA$2.57 Billion | ▲ +26.2% |
| 2003 | 0.16x | CA$444.30 Million | CA$2.77 Billion | ▲ +111.8% |
| 2002 | 0.08x | CA$186.94 Million | CA$2.47 Billion | ▼ -65.5% |
| 2001 | 0.22x | CA$502.34 Million | CA$2.29 Billion | ▲ +71.5% |
| 2000 | 0.13x | CA$323.50 Million | CA$2.53 Billion | ▼ -34.0% |
| 1999 | 0.19x | CA$369.40 Million | CA$1.90 Billion | ▲ +51.4% |
| 1998 | 0.13x | CA$202.00 Million | CA$1.58 Billion | ▼ -28.7% |
| 1997 | 0.18x | CA$234.40 Million | CA$1.30 Billion | ▼ -0.1% |
| 1996 | 0.18x | CA$234.60 Million | CA$1.30 Billion | ▲ +279.5% |
| 1995 | 0.05x | CA$68.00 Million | CA$1.44 Billion | — |