Canadian Utilities Limited Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Canadian Utilities Limited cash flow-to-debt ratio. Canadian Utilities Limited (CU) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.02x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$410.00 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$17.82 Billion) in one year. Check total reinvestment intensity of Canadian Utilities Limited to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Canadian Utilities Limited (1998–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Canadian Utilities Limited from 1998 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Canadian Utilities Limited across 28 annual periods. Check Canadian Utilities Limited (CU) cash flow quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
Canadian Utilities Limited Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1998–2025)
Canadian Utilities Limited cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1998 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Canadian Utilities Limited. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Canadian Utilities Limited (CU) cash conversion ratio.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.09x | CA$1.54 Billion | CA$17.94 Billion | ▼ -25.3% |
| 2024 | 0.12x | CA$1.92 Billion | CA$16.67 Billion | ▲ +38.7% |
| 2023 | 0.08x | CA$1.33 Billion | CA$16.00 Billion | ▼ -42.2% |
| 2022 | 0.14x | CA$2.14 Billion | CA$14.91 Billion | ▲ +19.1% |
| 2021 | 0.12x | CA$1.72 Billion | CA$14.25 Billion | ▼ -0.3% |
| 2020 | 0.12x | CA$1.63 Billion | CA$13.49 Billion | ▲ +16.9% |
| 2019 | 0.10x | CA$1.36 Billion | CA$13.12 Billion | ▲ +81.5% |
| 2018 | 0.06x | CA$870.00 Million | CA$15.26 Billion | ▼ -37.6% |
| 2017 | 0.09x | CA$1.31 Billion | CA$14.36 Billion | ▼ -30.4% |
| 2016 | 0.13x | CA$1.62 Billion | CA$12.36 Billion | ▼ -3.6% |
| 2015 | 0.14x | CA$1.62 Billion | CA$11.88 Billion | ▼ -2.0% |
| 2014 | 0.14x | CA$1.54 Billion | CA$11.10 Billion | ▼ -25.6% |
| 2013 | 0.19x | CA$1.80 Billion | CA$9.66 Billion | ▲ +21.7% |
| 2012 | 0.15x | CA$1.38 Billion | CA$9.03 Billion | ▼ -14.9% |
| 2011 | 0.18x | CA$1.35 Billion | CA$7.51 Billion | ▲ +24.4% |
| 2010 | 0.14x | CA$764.30 Million | CA$5.28 Billion | ▲ +3.0% |
| 2009 | 0.14x | CA$738.30 Million | CA$5.25 Billion | ▼ -9.2% |
| 2008 | 0.15x | CA$791.80 Million | CA$5.11 Billion | ▼ -9.3% |
| 2007 | 0.17x | CA$706.90 Million | CA$4.14 Billion | ▲ +11.5% |
| 2006 | 0.15x | CA$617.90 Million | CA$4.03 Billion | ▼ -19.1% |
| 2005 | 0.19x | CA$749.50 Million | CA$3.96 Billion | ▲ +9.7% |
| 2004 | 0.17x | CA$640.60 Million | CA$3.71 Billion | ▲ +27.2% |
| 2003 | 0.14x | CA$473.00 Million | CA$3.48 Billion | ▲ +44.4% |
| 2002 | 0.09x | CA$340.30 Million | CA$3.62 Billion | ▼ -52.4% |
| 2001 | 0.20x | CA$741.50 Million | CA$3.75 Billion | ▲ +118.3% |
| 2000 | 0.09x | CA$350.10 Million | CA$3.86 Billion | ▼ -33.8% |
| 1999 | 0.14x | CA$425.70 Million | CA$3.11 Billion | ▲ +20.1% |
| 1998 | 0.11x | CA$353.70 Million | CA$3.10 Billion | — |