Nutrien Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Nutrien Ltd cash flow-to-debt ratio. Nutrien Ltd (NTR) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.09x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$2.40 Billion could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$27.57 Billion) in one year. Check Nutrien Ltd (NTR) cash earnings ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Nutrien Ltd (1990–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Nutrien Ltd from 1990 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Nutrien Ltd across 36 annual periods. Check NTR cash reinvestment to operating cash ratio to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Nutrien Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1990–2025)
Nutrien Ltd cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1990 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Nutrien Ltd. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Nutrien Ltd cash flow conversion.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.15x | CA$4.08 Billion | CA$26.89 Billion | ▲ +17.5% |
| 2024 | 0.13x | CA$3.54 Billion | CA$27.40 Billion | ▼ -29.8% |
| 2023 | 0.18x | CA$5.07 Billion | CA$27.55 Billion | ▼ -34.9% |
| 2022 | 0.28x | CA$8.11 Billion | CA$28.72 Billion | ▲ +90.8% |
| 2021 | 0.15x | CA$3.89 Billion | CA$26.25 Billion | ▲ +10.6% |
| 2020 | 0.13x | CA$3.32 Billion | CA$24.83 Billion | ▼ -12.6% |
| 2019 | 0.15x | CA$3.67 Billion | CA$23.93 Billion | ▲ +57.3% |
| 2018 | 0.10x | CA$2.05 Billion | CA$21.08 Billion | ▼ -30.9% |
| 2017 | 0.14x | CA$1.23 Billion | CA$8.70 Billion | ▲ +1.3% |
| 2016 | 0.14x | CA$1.26 Billion | CA$9.06 Billion | ▼ -46.0% |
| 2015 | 0.26x | CA$2.34 Billion | CA$9.09 Billion | ▼ -12.1% |
| 2014 | 0.29x | CA$2.61 Billion | CA$8.93 Billion | ▼ -24.1% |
| 2013 | 0.39x | CA$3.21 Billion | CA$8.33 Billion | ▼ -0.8% |
| 2012 | 0.39x | CA$3.23 Billion | CA$8.29 Billion | ▼ -6.2% |
| 2011 | 0.41x | CA$3.48 Billion | CA$8.41 Billion | ▲ +21.8% |
| 2010 | 0.34x | CA$3.00 Billion | CA$8.82 Billion | ▲ +136.5% |
| 2009 | 0.14x | CA$923.90 Million | CA$6.42 Billion | ▼ -73.0% |
| 2008 | 0.53x | CA$3.01 Billion | CA$5.66 Billion | ▲ +16.6% |
| 2007 | 0.46x | CA$1.69 Billion | CA$3.70 Billion | ▲ +125.3% |
| 2006 | 0.20x | CA$696.80 Million | CA$3.44 Billion | ▼ -24.4% |
| 2005 | 0.27x | CA$865.10 Million | CA$3.23 Billion | ▲ +13.2% |
| 2004 | 0.24x | CA$649.60 Million | CA$2.74 Billion | ▲ +61.1% |
| 2003 | 0.15x | CA$381.50 Million | CA$2.59 Billion | ▲ +20.6% |
| 2002 | 0.12x | CA$316.40 Million | CA$2.59 Billion | ▲ +304.7% |
| 2001 | 0.03x | CA$75.70 Million | CA$2.51 Billion | ▼ -86.6% |
| 2000 | 0.23x | CA$480.40 Million | CA$2.13 Billion | ▲ +28.1% |
| 1999 | 0.18x | CA$343.61 Million | CA$1.95 Billion | ▼ -36.7% |
| 1998 | 0.28x | CA$578.00 Million | CA$2.08 Billion | ▲ +30.6% |
| 1997 | 0.21x | CA$467.80 Million | CA$2.20 Billion | ▼ -22.3% |
| 1996 | 0.27x | CA$296.20 Million | CA$1.08 Billion | ▲ +57.0% |
| 1995 | 0.17x | CA$233.50 Million | CA$1.34 Billion | ▼ -92.7% |
| 1994 | 2.38x | CA$150.70 Million | CA$63.40 Million | ▲ +931.6% |
| 1993 | 0.23x | CA$30.60 Million | CA$132.80 Million | ▼ -60.5% |
| 1992 | 0.58x | CA$63.30 Million | CA$108.60 Million | ▲ +78.7% |
| 1991 | 0.33x | CA$41.30 Million | CA$126.60 Million | ▼ -34.4% |
| 1990 | 0.50x | CA$79.90 Million | CA$160.70 Million | — |