Nutrien Ltd (NTR) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Nutrien Ltd (NTR) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.03x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-837.05 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$28.75 Billion) in one year. See NTR cash flow after capex ratio to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Nutrien Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1990–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Nutrien Ltd across 36 annual periods. Also explore NTR shareholders equity momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Nutrien Ltd (1990–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Nutrien Ltd. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Nutrien Ltd stock valuation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.15x | CA$4.08 Billion | CA$26.89 Billion | ▲ +17.5% |
| 2024 | 0.13x | CA$3.54 Billion | CA$27.40 Billion | ▼ -29.8% |
| 2023 | 0.18x | CA$5.07 Billion | CA$27.55 Billion | ▼ -34.9% |
| 2022 | 0.28x | CA$8.11 Billion | CA$28.72 Billion | ▲ +90.8% |
| 2021 | 0.15x | CA$3.89 Billion | CA$26.25 Billion | ▲ +10.6% |
| 2020 | 0.13x | CA$3.32 Billion | CA$24.83 Billion | ▼ -12.6% |
| 2019 | 0.15x | CA$3.67 Billion | CA$23.93 Billion | ▲ +57.3% |
| 2018 | 0.10x | CA$2.05 Billion | CA$21.08 Billion | ▼ -30.9% |
| 2017 | 0.14x | CA$1.23 Billion | CA$8.70 Billion | ▲ +1.3% |
| 2016 | 0.14x | CA$1.26 Billion | CA$9.06 Billion | ▼ -46.0% |
| 2015 | 0.26x | CA$2.34 Billion | CA$9.09 Billion | ▼ -12.1% |
| 2014 | 0.29x | CA$2.61 Billion | CA$8.93 Billion | ▼ -24.1% |
| 2013 | 0.39x | CA$3.21 Billion | CA$8.33 Billion | ▼ -0.8% |
| 2012 | 0.39x | CA$3.23 Billion | CA$8.29 Billion | ▼ -6.2% |
| 2011 | 0.41x | CA$3.48 Billion | CA$8.41 Billion | ▲ +21.8% |
| 2010 | 0.34x | CA$3.00 Billion | CA$8.82 Billion | ▲ +136.5% |
| 2009 | 0.14x | CA$923.90 Million | CA$6.42 Billion | ▼ -73.0% |
| 2008 | 0.53x | CA$3.01 Billion | CA$5.66 Billion | ▲ +16.6% |
| 2007 | 0.46x | CA$1.69 Billion | CA$3.70 Billion | ▲ +125.3% |
| 2006 | 0.20x | CA$696.80 Million | CA$3.44 Billion | ▼ -24.4% |
| 2005 | 0.27x | CA$865.10 Million | CA$3.23 Billion | ▲ +13.2% |
| 2004 | 0.24x | CA$649.60 Million | CA$2.74 Billion | ▲ +61.1% |
| 2003 | 0.15x | CA$381.50 Million | CA$2.59 Billion | ▲ +20.6% |
| 2002 | 0.12x | CA$316.40 Million | CA$2.59 Billion | ▲ +304.7% |
| 2001 | 0.03x | CA$75.70 Million | CA$2.51 Billion | ▼ -86.6% |
| 2000 | 0.23x | CA$480.40 Million | CA$2.13 Billion | ▲ +28.1% |
| 1999 | 0.18x | CA$343.61 Million | CA$1.95 Billion | ▼ -36.7% |
| 1998 | 0.28x | CA$578.00 Million | CA$2.08 Billion | ▲ +30.6% |
| 1997 | 0.21x | CA$467.80 Million | CA$2.20 Billion | ▼ -22.3% |
| 1996 | 0.27x | CA$296.20 Million | CA$1.08 Billion | ▲ +57.0% |
| 1995 | 0.17x | CA$233.50 Million | CA$1.34 Billion | ▼ -92.7% |
| 1994 | 2.38x | CA$150.70 Million | CA$63.40 Million | ▲ +931.6% |
| 1993 | 0.23x | CA$30.60 Million | CA$132.80 Million | ▼ -60.5% |
| 1992 | 0.58x | CA$63.30 Million | CA$108.60 Million | ▲ +78.7% |
| 1991 | 0.33x | CA$41.30 Million | CA$126.60 Million | ▼ -34.4% |
| 1990 | 0.50x | CA$79.90 Million | CA$160.70 Million | — |