Nutrien Ltd (NTR) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Nutrien Ltd (NTR) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.09x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$2.40 Billion could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$27.57 Billion) in one year. See Nutrien Ltd free cash flow to debt ratio to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Nutrien Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1990–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Nutrien Ltd across 36 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Nutrien Ltd (NTR) cash conversion ratio.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Nutrien Ltd (1990–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Nutrien Ltd. Check Nutrien Ltd (NTR) cash flow quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.15x | CA$4.08 Billion | CA$26.89 Billion | ▲ +17.5% |
| 2024 | 0.13x | CA$3.54 Billion | CA$27.40 Billion | ▼ -29.8% |
| 2023 | 0.18x | CA$5.07 Billion | CA$27.55 Billion | ▼ -34.9% |
| 2022 | 0.28x | CA$8.11 Billion | CA$28.72 Billion | ▲ +90.8% |
| 2021 | 0.15x | CA$3.89 Billion | CA$26.25 Billion | ▲ +10.6% |
| 2020 | 0.13x | CA$3.32 Billion | CA$24.83 Billion | ▼ -12.6% |
| 2019 | 0.15x | CA$3.67 Billion | CA$23.93 Billion | ▲ +57.3% |
| 2018 | 0.10x | CA$2.05 Billion | CA$21.08 Billion | ▼ -30.9% |
| 2017 | 0.14x | CA$1.23 Billion | CA$8.70 Billion | ▲ +1.3% |
| 2016 | 0.14x | CA$1.26 Billion | CA$9.06 Billion | ▼ -46.0% |
| 2015 | 0.26x | CA$2.34 Billion | CA$9.09 Billion | ▼ -12.1% |
| 2014 | 0.29x | CA$2.61 Billion | CA$8.93 Billion | ▼ -24.1% |
| 2013 | 0.39x | CA$3.21 Billion | CA$8.33 Billion | ▼ -0.8% |
| 2012 | 0.39x | CA$3.23 Billion | CA$8.29 Billion | ▼ -6.2% |
| 2011 | 0.41x | CA$3.48 Billion | CA$8.41 Billion | ▲ +21.8% |
| 2010 | 0.34x | CA$3.00 Billion | CA$8.82 Billion | ▲ +136.5% |
| 2009 | 0.14x | CA$923.90 Million | CA$6.42 Billion | ▼ -73.0% |
| 2008 | 0.53x | CA$3.01 Billion | CA$5.66 Billion | ▲ +16.6% |
| 2007 | 0.46x | CA$1.69 Billion | CA$3.70 Billion | ▲ +125.3% |
| 2006 | 0.20x | CA$696.80 Million | CA$3.44 Billion | ▼ -24.4% |
| 2005 | 0.27x | CA$865.10 Million | CA$3.23 Billion | ▲ +13.2% |
| 2004 | 0.24x | CA$649.60 Million | CA$2.74 Billion | ▲ +61.1% |
| 2003 | 0.15x | CA$381.50 Million | CA$2.59 Billion | ▲ +20.6% |
| 2002 | 0.12x | CA$316.40 Million | CA$2.59 Billion | ▲ +304.7% |
| 2001 | 0.03x | CA$75.70 Million | CA$2.51 Billion | ▼ -86.6% |
| 2000 | 0.23x | CA$480.40 Million | CA$2.13 Billion | ▲ +28.1% |
| 1999 | 0.18x | CA$343.61 Million | CA$1.95 Billion | ▼ -36.7% |
| 1998 | 0.28x | CA$578.00 Million | CA$2.08 Billion | ▲ +30.6% |
| 1997 | 0.21x | CA$467.80 Million | CA$2.20 Billion | ▼ -22.3% |
| 1996 | 0.27x | CA$296.20 Million | CA$1.08 Billion | ▲ +57.0% |
| 1995 | 0.17x | CA$233.50 Million | CA$1.34 Billion | ▼ -92.7% |
| 1994 | 2.38x | CA$150.70 Million | CA$63.40 Million | ▲ +931.6% |
| 1993 | 0.23x | CA$30.60 Million | CA$132.80 Million | ▼ -60.5% |
| 1992 | 0.58x | CA$63.30 Million | CA$108.60 Million | ▲ +78.7% |
| 1991 | 0.33x | CA$41.30 Million | CA$126.60 Million | ▼ -34.4% |
| 1990 | 0.50x | CA$79.90 Million | CA$160.70 Million | — |