Vermilion Energy Inc. (VET) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Vermilion Energy Inc. (VET) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.06x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$227.40 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$3.50 Billion) in one year. See Vermilion Energy Inc. free cash flow generation to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Vermilion Energy Inc. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1995–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Vermilion Energy Inc. across 31 annual periods. Also explore VET net assets growth trend to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Vermilion Energy Inc. (1995–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Vermilion Energy Inc.. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see VET stock market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.30x | CA$943.66 Million | CA$3.12 Billion | ▲ +3.2% |
| 2024 | 0.29x | CA$967.75 Million | CA$3.30 Billion | ▼ -8.4% |
| 2023 | 0.32x | CA$1.02 Billion | CA$3.20 Billion | ▼ -36.7% |
| 2022 | 0.51x | CA$1.81 Billion | CA$3.59 Billion | ▲ +132.5% |
| 2021 | 0.22x | CA$834.45 Million | CA$3.84 Billion | ▲ +38.4% |
| 2020 | 0.16x | CA$500.15 Million | CA$3.18 Billion | ▼ -34.9% |
| 2019 | 0.24x | CA$823.47 Million | CA$3.41 Billion | ▲ +2.1% |
| 2018 | 0.24x | CA$816.01 Million | CA$3.45 Billion | ▼ -3.2% |
| 2017 | 0.24x | CA$593.90 Million | CA$2.43 Billion | ▲ +20.2% |
| 2016 | 0.20x | CA$509.54 Million | CA$2.51 Billion | ▲ +7.4% |
| 2015 | 0.19x | CA$444.41 Million | CA$2.35 Billion | ▼ -43.5% |
| 2014 | 0.33x | CA$791.99 Million | CA$2.36 Billion | ▼ -5.4% |
| 2013 | 0.35x | CA$705.02 Million | CA$1.99 Billion | ▲ +18.1% |
| 2012 | 0.30x | CA$496.58 Million | CA$1.66 Billion | ▼ -6.0% |
| 2011 | 0.32x | CA$447.09 Million | CA$1.40 Billion | ▼ -3.1% |
| 2010 | 0.33x | CA$421.28 Million | CA$1.28 Billion | ▲ +34.9% |
| 2009 | 0.24x | CA$230.32 Million | CA$944.56 Million | ▼ -64.6% |
| 2008 | 0.69x | CA$660.13 Million | CA$958.83 Million | ▲ +91.3% |
| 2007 | 0.36x | CA$349.89 Million | CA$972.19 Million | ▲ +2.8% |
| 2006 | 0.35x | CA$306.03 Million | CA$874.45 Million | ▼ -12.2% |
| 2005 | 0.40x | CA$245.12 Million | CA$614.83 Million | ▼ -13.8% |
| 2004 | 0.46x | CA$191.38 Million | CA$414.01 Million | ▲ +12.0% |
| 2003 | 0.41x | CA$164.04 Million | CA$397.44 Million | ▲ +33.0% |
| 2002 | 0.31x | CA$144.65 Million | CA$466.08 Million | ▼ -37.4% |
| 2001 | 0.50x | CA$156.39 Million | CA$315.41 Million | ▼ -9.6% |
| 2000 | 0.55x | CA$151.52 Million | CA$276.26 Million | ▲ +104.8% |
| 1999 | 0.27x | CA$41.30 Million | CA$154.20 Million | ▲ +31.0% |
| 1998 | 0.20x | CA$28.80 Million | CA$140.90 Million | ▼ -66.5% |
| 1997 | 0.61x | CA$32.00 Million | CA$52.50 Million | ▲ +203.4% |
| 1996 | 0.20x | CA$4.60 Million | CA$22.90 Million | ▲ +90.2% |
| 1995 | 0.11x | CA$1.50 Million | CA$14.20 Million | — |