Crocs Inc (CROX) — Net Asset Quality Index
Crocs Inc (CROX) has a Net Asset Quality Index of 32.9% as of March 2026. This metric measures the proportion of total assets financed by shareholders' equity — total assets of $4.34 Billion minus total liabilities of $2.92 Billion yields net assets of $1.43 Billion. A higher index indicates a stronger, lower-leverage balance sheet. Check CROX asset liquidity ratio to evaluate the company's liquid asset resilience ratio.
Quality Index
Net Assets
Total Assets
Total Liabilities
Crocs Inc Net Asset Quality Index Over Time (2002–2025)
This chart shows how Crocs Inc's Net Asset Quality Index has evolved across 24 annual periods from 2002 to 2025. As of March 2026, the index stands at 32.9%, representing net assets of $1.43 Billion against total assets of $4.34 Billion USD. See Crocs Inc short-term liquidity ratio to evaluate short-term liquidity relative to the company's equity base.
Annual Net Asset Quality Index for Crocs Inc (2002–2025)
The table below presents the year-by-year Net Asset Quality Index for Crocs Inc from 2002 to 2025, covering 24 annual filings. Each row shows total assets, total liabilities, net assets, the quality index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For market capitalisation and the full company profile, see market value of Crocs Inc.
| Year | Quality Index | Net Assets (USD) | Total Assets | Total Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 31.0% | $1.29 Billion | $4.17 Billion | $2.88 Billion | ▼ -7.2 pp |
| 2024 | 38.1% | $1.84 Billion | $4.81 Billion | $2.98 Billion | ▲ +6.8 pp |
| 2023 | 31.3% | $1.45 Billion | $4.64 Billion | $3.19 Billion | ▲ +13.1 pp |
| 2022 | 18.2% | $817.93 Million | $4.50 Billion | $3.68 Billion | ▲ +17.3 pp |
| 2021 | 0.9% | $14.08 Million | $1.55 Billion | $1.53 Billion | ▼ -25.1 pp |
| 2020 | 26.0% | $290.63 Million | $1.12 Billion | $828.09 Million | ▲ +8.1 pp |
| 2019 | 17.9% | $131.91 Million | $738.80 Million | $606.90 Million | ▼ -14.2 pp |
| 2018 | 32.1% | $150.31 Million | $468.90 Million | $318.59 Million | ▼ -35.7 pp |
| 2017 | 67.7% | $368.30 Million | $543.70 Million | $175.40 Million | ▼ -2.8 pp |
| 2016 | 70.5% | $399.28 Million | $566.39 Million | $167.11 Million | ▲ +1.2 pp |
| 2015 | 69.3% | $421.63 Million | $608.02 Million | $186.39 Million | ▼ -8.1 pp |
| 2014 | 77.5% | $625.20 Million | $806.93 Million | $181.73 Million | ▲ +6.1 pp |
| 2013 | 71.4% | $624.74 Million | $875.16 Million | $250.41 Million | ▼ -3.0 pp |
| 2012 | 74.4% | $617.40 Million | $829.64 Million | $212.24 Million | ▲ +3.7 pp |
| 2011 | 70.7% | $491.78 Million | $695.45 Million | $203.67 Million | ▲ +2.3 pp |
| 2010 | 68.4% | $376.11 Million | $549.48 Million | $173.38 Million | ▼ -1.7 pp |
| 2009 | 70.2% | $287.62 Million | $409.74 Million | $122.12 Million | ▲ +7.2 pp |
| 2008 | 63.0% | $287.16 Million | $456.00 Million | $168.84 Million | ▼ -7.8 pp |
| 2007 | 70.8% | $444.11 Million | $627.42 Million | $183.31 Million | ▲ +1.2 pp |
| 2006 | 69.5% | $208.26 Million | $299.46 Million | $91.20 Million | ▲ +45.3 pp |
| 2005 | 24.2% | $18.91 Million | $78.03 Million | $59.12 Million | ▲ +46.4 pp |
| 2004 | -22.1% | $-3.59 Million | $16.22 Million | $19.82 Million | ▲ +103.8 pp |
| 2003 | -125.9% | $-1.64 Million | $1.30 Million | $2.95 Million | ▼ -211.6 pp |
| 2002 | 85.7% | $389.00K | $454.00K | $65.00K | — |