China Glaze Co Ltd (1809) — Net Asset Quality Index
China Glaze Co Ltd (1809) has a Net Asset Quality Index of 73.3% as of December 2025. This metric measures the proportion of total assets financed by shareholders' equity — total assets of NT$4.51 Billion minus total liabilities of NT$1.21 Billion yields net assets of NT$3.31 Billion. A higher index indicates a stronger, lower-leverage balance sheet. Check financial resilience of China Glaze Co Ltd to evaluate the company's liquid asset resilience ratio.
Quality Index
Net Assets
Total Assets
Total Liabilities
China Glaze Co Ltd Net Asset Quality Index Over Time (2002–2025)
This chart shows how China Glaze Co Ltd's Net Asset Quality Index has evolved across 24 annual periods from 2002 to 2025. As of December 2025, the index stands at 73.3%, representing net assets of NT$3.31 Billion against total assets of NT$4.51 Billion TWD. See 1809 working capital ratio to evaluate short-term liquidity relative to the company's equity base.
Annual Net Asset Quality Index for China Glaze Co Ltd (2002–2025)
The table below presents the year-by-year Net Asset Quality Index for China Glaze Co Ltd from 2002 to 2025, covering 24 annual filings. Each row shows total assets, total liabilities, net assets, the quality index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For market capitalisation and the full company profile, see 1809 market cap.
| Year | Quality Index | Net Assets (TWD) | Total Assets | Total Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 73.3% | NT$3.31 Billion | NT$4.51 Billion | NT$1.21 Billion | ▼ -1.2 pp |
| 2024 | 74.5% | NT$3.38 Billion | NT$4.54 Billion | NT$1.16 Billion | ▲ +2.1 pp |
| 2023 | 72.3% | NT$3.33 Billion | NT$4.61 Billion | NT$1.27 Billion | ▲ +0.1 pp |
| 2022 | 72.3% | NT$3.42 Billion | NT$4.73 Billion | NT$1.31 Billion | ▼ -4.8 pp |
| 2021 | 77.1% | NT$3.38 Billion | NT$4.38 Billion | NT$1.01 Billion | ▼ -3.7 pp |
| 2020 | 80.8% | NT$3.47 Billion | NT$4.30 Billion | NT$826.62 Million | ▲ +1.6 pp |
| 2019 | 79.1% | NT$3.63 Billion | NT$4.58 Billion | NT$957.14 Million | ▲ +0.2 pp |
| 2018 | 78.9% | NT$3.80 Billion | NT$4.82 Billion | NT$1.01 Billion | ▲ +1.8 pp |
| 2017 | 77.2% | NT$3.92 Billion | NT$5.08 Billion | NT$1.16 Billion | ▼ -1.3 pp |
| 2016 | 78.5% | NT$4.04 Billion | NT$5.14 Billion | NT$1.11 Billion | ▲ +1.4 pp |
| 2015 | 77.1% | NT$4.44 Billion | NT$5.76 Billion | NT$1.32 Billion | ▲ +1.0 pp |
| 2014 | 76.1% | NT$4.55 Billion | NT$5.98 Billion | NT$1.43 Billion | ▲ +3.2 pp |
| 2013 | 72.9% | NT$4.34 Billion | NT$5.94 Billion | NT$1.61 Billion | ▲ +3.1 pp |
| 2012 | 69.9% | NT$4.11 Billion | NT$5.88 Billion | NT$1.77 Billion | ▲ +0.7 pp |
| 2011 | 69.2% | NT$4.20 Billion | NT$6.07 Billion | NT$1.87 Billion | ▲ +0.1 pp |
| 2010 | 69.1% | NT$4.03 Billion | NT$5.83 Billion | NT$1.80 Billion | ▲ +5.1 pp |
| 2009 | 64.0% | NT$3.68 Billion | NT$5.75 Billion | NT$2.07 Billion | ▼ -1.3 pp |
| 2008 | 65.3% | NT$3.51 Billion | NT$5.38 Billion | NT$1.86 Billion | ▲ +0.5 pp |
| 2007 | 64.8% | NT$3.35 Billion | NT$5.16 Billion | NT$1.82 Billion | ▲ +1.2 pp |
| 2006 | 63.5% | NT$3.05 Billion | NT$4.80 Billion | NT$1.75 Billion | ▼ -1.0 pp |
| 2005 | 64.5% | NT$2.89 Billion | NT$4.48 Billion | NT$1.59 Billion | ▲ +2.2 pp |
| 2004 | 62.3% | NT$2.01 Billion | NT$3.23 Billion | NT$1.22 Billion | ▼ -0.2 pp |
| 2003 | 62.6% | NT$2.65 Billion | NT$4.24 Billion | NT$1.59 Billion | ▲ +4.1 pp |
| 2002 | 58.4% | NT$1.96 Billion | NT$3.36 Billion | NT$1.40 Billion | — |