Malvern International Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Malvern International tangible net worth ratio. Malvern International (MLVN) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of 0.6% as of June 2019. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets (GBX4.70 Million) from net assets (GBX4.73 Million) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. Check MLVN strategic assets to equity ratio to assess the company's strategic physical and investment asset allocation.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Tangible Net Worth Ratio of Malvern International (2002–2018)
Tangible net worth ratio of Malvern International from 2002 to 2018. This chart shows how Malvern International's Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 17 annual periods from 2002 to 2018. As of June 2019, the ratio stands at 0.6%, reflecting net assets of GBX4.73 Million with intangible assets of GBX4.70 Million GBX. See how liquid is Malvern International's working capital to evaluate short-term liquidity relative to the company's equity base.
Malvern International Tangible Net Worth Ratio by Year (2002–2018)
Malvern International tangible net worth ratio by year from 2002 to 2018. The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Malvern International from 2002 to 2018, covering 17 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. For live market cap and overall valuation, see how much is Malvern International worth.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (GBX) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | 46.0% | GBX5.82 Million | GBX3.15 Million | GBX8.60 Million | ▲ +144.5 pp |
| 2017 | -98.6% | GBX1.20 Million | GBX2.38 Million | GBX4.94 Million | ▼ -5.4 pp |
| 2016 | -93.1% | GBX1.11 Million | GBX2.15 Million | GBX3.60 Million | ▲ +565.5 pp |
| 2015 | -658.6% | GBX322.36K | GBX2.45 Million | GBX4.75 Million | ▼ -631.0 pp |
| 2014 | -27.7% | GBX2.43 Million | GBX3.10 Million | GBX5.66 Million | ▲ +1.7 pp |
| 2013 | -29.4% | GBX2.79 Million | GBX3.60 Million | GBX8.32 Million | ▼ -36.7 pp |
| 2012 | 7.3% | GBX4.70 Million | GBX4.36 Million | GBX12.62 Million | ▼ -11.7 pp |
| 2011 | 19.0% | GBX8.05 Million | GBX6.52 Million | GBX16.54 Million | ▲ +2.7 pp |
| 2010 | 16.3% | GBX7.83 Million | GBX6.55 Million | GBX14.60 Million | ▼ -11.2 pp |
| 2009 | 27.5% | GBX7.70 Million | GBX5.58 Million | GBX14.34 Million | ▼ -4.8 pp |
| 2008 | 32.3% | GBX3.92 Million | GBX2.65 Million | GBX6.69 Million | ▼ -65.1 pp |
| 2007 | 97.4% | GBX2.09 Million | GBX55.00K | GBX3.46 Million | ▲ +0.3 pp |
| 2006 | 97.0% | GBX1.69 Million | GBX50.00K | GBX2.50 Million | ▼ -1.6 pp |
| 2005 | 98.6% | GBX2.05 Million | GBX28.00K | GBX2.62 Million | ▲ +0.4 pp |
| 2004 | 98.2% | GBX1.94 Million | GBX34.00K | GBX2.63 Million | ▲ +0.4 pp |
| 2003 | 97.8% | GBX1.95 Million | GBX43.00K | GBX3.21 Million | ▼ -2.2 pp |
| 2002 | 100.0% | GBX1.67 Million | GBX0.00 | GBX2.78 Million | — |