Malvern International (MLVN) — Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Malvern International (MLVN) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of 0.6% as of June 2019. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets (GBX4.70 Million) from net assets (GBX4.73 Million) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. See MLVN total equity for net asset value and shareholders' equity analysis.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Malvern International Tangible Net Worth Ratio (2002–2018)
This chart shows how Malvern International's Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 17 annual periods from 2002 to 2018. As of June 2019, the ratio stands at 0.6%, reflecting net assets of GBX4.73 Million with intangible assets of GBX4.70 Million GBX. Also explore MLVN net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Malvern International (2002–2018)
The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Malvern International from 2002 to 2018, covering 17 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. For the full company profile including market capitalisation, see MLVN market cap overview.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (GBX) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | 46.0% | GBX5.82 Million | GBX3.15 Million | GBX8.60 Million | ▲ +144.5 pp |
| 2017 | -98.6% | GBX1.20 Million | GBX2.38 Million | GBX4.94 Million | ▼ -5.4 pp |
| 2016 | -93.1% | GBX1.11 Million | GBX2.15 Million | GBX3.60 Million | ▲ +565.5 pp |
| 2015 | -658.6% | GBX322.36K | GBX2.45 Million | GBX4.75 Million | ▼ -631.0 pp |
| 2014 | -27.7% | GBX2.43 Million | GBX3.10 Million | GBX5.66 Million | ▲ +1.7 pp |
| 2013 | -29.4% | GBX2.79 Million | GBX3.60 Million | GBX8.32 Million | ▼ -36.7 pp |
| 2012 | 7.3% | GBX4.70 Million | GBX4.36 Million | GBX12.62 Million | ▼ -11.7 pp |
| 2011 | 19.0% | GBX8.05 Million | GBX6.52 Million | GBX16.54 Million | ▲ +2.7 pp |
| 2010 | 16.3% | GBX7.83 Million | GBX6.55 Million | GBX14.60 Million | ▼ -11.2 pp |
| 2009 | 27.5% | GBX7.70 Million | GBX5.58 Million | GBX14.34 Million | ▼ -4.8 pp |
| 2008 | 32.3% | GBX3.92 Million | GBX2.65 Million | GBX6.69 Million | ▼ -65.1 pp |
| 2007 | 97.4% | GBX2.09 Million | GBX55.00K | GBX3.46 Million | ▲ +0.3 pp |
| 2006 | 97.0% | GBX1.69 Million | GBX50.00K | GBX2.50 Million | ▼ -1.6 pp |
| 2005 | 98.6% | GBX2.05 Million | GBX28.00K | GBX2.62 Million | ▲ +0.4 pp |
| 2004 | 98.2% | GBX1.94 Million | GBX34.00K | GBX2.63 Million | ▲ +0.4 pp |
| 2003 | 97.8% | GBX1.95 Million | GBX43.00K | GBX3.21 Million | ▼ -2.2 pp |
| 2002 | 100.0% | GBX1.67 Million | GBX0.00 | GBX2.78 Million | — |