Kestrel Group, Ltd. (KG) — Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Kestrel Group, Ltd. (KG) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of 93.3% as of June 2026. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets ($7.68 Million) from net assets ($113.96 Million) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. Also explore Kestrel Group, Ltd. (KG) net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Kestrel Group, Ltd. Tangible Net Worth Ratio (2000–2025)
This chart shows how Kestrel Group, Ltd.'s Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 16 annual periods from 2000 to 2025. As of June 2026, the ratio stands at 93.3%, reflecting net assets of $113.96 Million with intangible assets of $7.68 Million USD. For live market cap and overall valuation, see KG company net worth.
Annual Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Kestrel Group, Ltd. (2000–2025)
The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Kestrel Group, Ltd. from 2000 to 2025, covering 16 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. Explore KG capital reinvestment ratio to see what proportion of operating cash flow is directed to capital expenditures.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (USD) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 92.7% | $128.28 Million | $9.35 Million | $548.76 Million | ▼ -7.3 pp |
| 2024 | 100.0% | $4.61 Million | $0.00 | $5.51 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2023 | 100.0% | $249.16 Million | $0.00 | $954.60 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2022 | 100.0% | $284.58 Million | $0.00 | $1.85 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2021 | 100.0% | $384.26 Million | $0.00 | $2.32 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2020 | 100.0% | $527.82 Million | $0.00 | $2.95 Billion | ▲ +53.3 pp |
| 2009 | 46.7% | $2.37 Billion | $1.26 Billion | $3.33 Billion | ▲ +10.3 pp |
| 2008 | 36.4% | $2.18 Billion | $1.38 Billion | $4.26 Billion | ▼ -27.4 pp |
| 2007 | 63.8% | $2.51 Billion | $910.12 Million | $3.43 Billion | ▲ +6.2 pp |
| 2006 | 57.5% | $2.29 Billion | $972.54 Million | $3.33 Billion | ▲ +12.7 pp |
| 2005 | 44.8% | $1.97 Billion | $1.09 Billion | $2.97 Billion | ▲ +21.0 pp |
| 2004 | 23.9% | $1.85 Billion | $1.41 Billion | $2.92 Billion | ▲ +15.9 pp |
| 2003 | 8.0% | $2.04 Billion | $1.88 Billion | $3.18 Billion | ▼ -28.2 pp |
| 2002 | 36.2% | $1.93 Billion | $1.23 Billion | $2.75 Billion | ▼ -9.4 pp |
| 2001 | 45.6% | $1.91 Billion | $1.04 Billion | $2.51 Billion | ▲ +25.6 pp |
| 2000 | 20.0% | $987.73 Million | $790.32 Million | $1.28 Billion | — |