Complete Solaria, Inc Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Complete Solaria, Inc tangible net worth ratio. Complete Solaria, Inc (SPWR) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of 95.7% as of June 2023. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets ($20.68 Million) from net assets ($477.68 Million) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. Also explore net asset growth rate of Complete Solaria, Inc to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Tangible Net Worth Ratio of Complete Solaria, Inc (2005–2022)
Tangible net worth ratio of Complete Solaria, Inc from 2005 to 2022. This chart shows how Complete Solaria, Inc's Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 16 annual periods from 2005 to 2022. As of June 2023, the ratio stands at 95.7%, reflecting net assets of $477.68 Million with intangible assets of $20.68 Million USD. Check strategic asset allocation of Complete Solaria, Inc to assess the company's strategic physical and investment asset allocation.
Complete Solaria, Inc Tangible Net Worth Ratio by Year (2005–2022)
Complete Solaria, Inc tangible net worth ratio by year from 2005 to 2022. The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Complete Solaria, Inc from 2005 to 2022, covering 16 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. For live market cap and overall valuation, see Complete Solaria, Inc (SPWR) market capitalisation.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (USD) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 59.5% | $105.28 Million | $42.61 Million | $228.18 Million | ▼ -40.3 pp |
| 2020 | 99.8% | $406.49 Million | $697.00K | $1.65 Billion | ▲ +33.0 pp |
| 2019 | 66.9% | $21.50 Million | $7.12 Million | $2.17 Billion | ▼ -29.4 pp |
| 2017 | 96.3% | $692.39 Million | $25.52 Million | $4.03 Billion | ▲ +0.4 pp |
| 2016 | 95.9% | $1.09 Billion | $44.22 Million | $4.57 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2015 | 95.9% | $1.51 Billion | $61.44 Million | $4.86 Billion | ▼ -3.0 pp |
| 2014 | 98.9% | $1.58 Billion | $16.76 Million | $4.35 Billion | ▼ -1.1 pp |
| 2013 | 100.0% | $1.15 Billion | $0.00 | $3.90 Billion | ▲ +0.1 pp |
| 2012 | 99.9% | $993.35 Million | $744.00K | $3.34 Billion | ▲ +1.8 pp |
| 2011 | 98.1% | $1.27 Billion | $23.90 Million | $3.52 Billion | ▲ +2.2 pp |
| 2010 | 96.0% | $1.66 Billion | $66.79 Million | $3.38 Billion | ▼ -2.2 pp |
| 2009 | 98.2% | $1.38 Billion | $24.97 Million | $2.70 Billion | ▲ +2.1 pp |
| 2008 | 96.1% | $1.02 Billion | $39.49 Million | $2.08 Billion | ▲ +2.0 pp |
| 2007 | 94.1% | $864.09 Million | $50.95 Million | $1.65 Billion | ▼ -3.0 pp |
| 2006 | 97.1% | $488.77 Million | $14.05 Million | $576.84 Million | ▲ +5.5 pp |
| 2005 | 91.6% | $258.65 Million | $21.62 Million | $317.65 Million | — |