Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings Inc (CCO) — Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings Inc (CCO) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of -1375.2% as of June 2014. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets ($1.52 Billion) from net assets ($103.30 Million) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. See CCO working capital efficiency to evaluate short-term liquidity relative to the company's equity base.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings Inc Tangible Net Worth Ratio (2001–2013)
This chart shows how Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings Inc's Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 13 annual periods from 2001 to 2013. As of June 2014, the ratio stands at -1375.2%, reflecting net assets of $103.30 Million with intangible assets of $1.52 Billion USD. See Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings Inc (CCO) defensive interval to measure how many days the company can operate on defensive assets alone.
Annual Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings Inc (2001–2013)
The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings Inc from 2001 to 2013, covering 13 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. For the full company profile including market capitalisation, see CCO company net worth.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (USD) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 | -871.7% | $160.11 Million | $1.56 Billion | $6.76 Billion | ▼ -606.7 pp |
| 2012 | -265.0% | $446.09 Million | $1.63 Billion | $7.11 Billion | ▼ -303.4 pp |
| 2011 | 38.4% | $2.80 Billion | $1.72 Billion | $7.09 Billion | ▲ +5.6 pp |
| 2010 | 32.8% | $2.71 Billion | $1.82 Billion | $7.10 Billion | ▲ +2.7 pp |
| 2009 | 30.1% | $2.76 Billion | $1.93 Billion | $7.19 Billion | ▲ +1.4 pp |
| 2008 | 28.6% | $3.54 Billion | $2.53 Billion | $8.05 Billion | ▼ -48.4 pp |
| 2007 | 77.0% | $2.20 Billion | $505.58 Million | $5.94 Billion | ▲ +8.3 pp |
| 2006 | 68.7% | $1.77 Billion | $553.38 Million | $5.42 Billion | ▲ +56.5 pp |
| 2005 | 12.2% | $1.38 Billion | $1.21 Billion | $4.92 Billion | ▼ -68.3 pp |
| 2004 | 80.5% | $2.79 Billion | $545.97 Million | $5.24 Billion | ▲ +9.2 pp |
| 2003 | 71.3% | $2.81 Billion | $809.21 Million | $5.23 Billion | ▼ -28.7 pp |
| 2002 | 100.0% | $2.58 Billion | $0.00 | $4.93 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2001 | 100.0% | $5.41 Billion | $0.00 | $7.81 Billion | — |