Western Union Co (WU) — Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Western Union Co (WU) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of 57.3% as of March 2026. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets ($388.80 Million) from net assets ($910.50 Million) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. See WU working capital efficiency to evaluate short-term liquidity relative to the company's equity base.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Western Union Co Tangible Net Worth Ratio (2002–2025)
This chart shows how Western Union Co's Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 18 annual periods from 2002 to 2025. As of March 2026, the ratio stands at 57.3%, reflecting net assets of $910.50 Million with intangible assets of $388.80 Million USD. See operational self-sufficiency of Western Union Co to measure how many days the company can operate on defensive assets alone.
Annual Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Western Union Co (2002–2025)
The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Western Union Co from 2002 to 2025, covering 18 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. For the full company profile including market capitalisation, see market cap of Western Union Co.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (USD) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 62.8% | $957.80 Million | $356.30 Million | $8.31 Billion | ▼ -4.6 pp |
| 2024 | 67.4% | $968.90 Million | $315.40 Million | $8.37 Billion | ▲ +12.1 pp |
| 2023 | 55.4% | $479.00 Million | $213.80 Million | $8.20 Billion | ▲ +51.2 pp |
| 2022 | 4.2% | $477.80 Million | $457.90 Million | $8.50 Billion | ▲ +21.5 pp |
| 2021 | -17.3% | $355.60 Million | $417.10 Million | $8.82 Billion | ▲ +153.3 pp |
| 2020 | -170.6% | $186.60 Million | $505.00 Million | $9.50 Billion | ▼ -197.0 pp |
| 2016 | 26.4% | $902.20 Million | $664.20 Million | $9.42 Billion | ▼ -23.4 pp |
| 2015 | 49.8% | $1.40 Billion | $705.00 Million | $9.46 Billion | ▲ +7.3 pp |
| 2014 | 42.5% | $1.30 Billion | $748.10 Million | $9.89 Billion | ▲ +17.9 pp |
| 2013 | 24.5% | $1.10 Billion | $833.80 Million | $10.12 Billion | ▲ +18.0 pp |
| 2012 | 6.6% | $940.60 Million | $878.90 Million | $9.47 Billion | ▲ +1.3 pp |
| 2011 | 5.3% | $894.80 Million | $847.40 Million | $9.07 Billion | ▼ -19.5 pp |
| 2010 | 24.8% | $582.70 Million | $438.00 Million | $7.93 Billion | ▲ +63.2 pp |
| 2009 | -38.4% | $353.50 Million | $489.20 Million | $7.35 Billion | ▲ +520.6 pp |
| 2007 | -559.0% | $50.70 Million | $334.10 Million | $5.78 Billion | ▼ -652.6 pp |
| 2005 | 93.6% | $2.81 Billion | $180.40 Million | $4.61 Billion | ▲ +64.7 pp |
| 2004 | 28.9% | $1.91 Billion | $1.36 Billion | $3.31 Billion | ▼ -71.1 pp |
| 2002 | 100.0% | $1.47 Billion | $0.00 | $2.47 Billion | — |