Companhiade Eletricidade do Estado da Bahia - COELBA (CEEB3) — Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Companhiade Eletricidade do Estado da Bahia - COELBA (CEEB3) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of 80.3% as of September 2025. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets (R$1.69 Billion) from net assets (R$8.57 Billion) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. See Companhiade Eletricidade do Estado da Ba working capital to net assets to evaluate short-term liquidity relative to the company's equity base.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Companhiade Eletricidade do Estado da Bahia - COELBA Tangible Net Worth Ratio (2000–2024)
This chart shows how Companhiade Eletricidade do Estado da Bahia - COELBA's Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 25 annual periods from 2000 to 2024. As of September 2025, the ratio stands at 80.3%, reflecting net assets of R$8.57 Billion with intangible assets of R$1.69 Billion BRL. See CEEB3 days of operational coverage to measure how many days the company can operate on defensive assets alone.
Annual Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Companhiade Eletricidade do Estado da Bahia - COELBA (2000–2024)
The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Companhiade Eletricidade do Estado da Bahia - COELBA from 2000 to 2024, covering 25 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. For the full company profile including market capitalisation, see Companhiade Eletricidade do Estado da Ba market cap and net worth.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (BRL) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 69.4% | R$7.42 Billion | R$2.27 Billion | R$31.28 Billion | ▲ +12.9 pp |
| 2023 | 56.5% | R$6.44 Billion | R$2.80 Billion | R$27.88 Billion | ▲ +10.5 pp |
| 2022 | 45.9% | R$5.91 Billion | R$3.19 Billion | R$25.63 Billion | ▼ -1.7 pp |
| 2021 | 47.6% | R$6.18 Billion | R$3.23 Billion | R$24.40 Billion | ▲ +37.2 pp |
| 2020 | 10.5% | R$6.11 Billion | R$5.47 Billion | R$20.92 Billion | ▼ -26.4 pp |
| 2019 | 36.9% | R$5.22 Billion | R$3.30 Billion | R$18.95 Billion | ▲ +35.6 pp |
| 2018 | 1.3% | R$5.21 Billion | R$5.14 Billion | R$14.53 Billion | ▲ +39.6 pp |
| 2017 | -38.3% | R$3.17 Billion | R$4.38 Billion | R$12.55 Billion | ▼ -2.9 pp |
| 2016 | -35.4% | R$2.96 Billion | R$4.00 Billion | R$10.53 Billion | ▼ -12.9 pp |
| 2015 | -22.6% | R$3.07 Billion | R$3.76 Billion | R$9.65 Billion | ▲ +6.0 pp |
| 2014 | -28.5% | R$2.79 Billion | R$3.58 Billion | R$8.33 Billion | ▲ +18.6 pp |
| 2013 | -47.1% | R$2.49 Billion | R$3.67 Billion | R$7.63 Billion | ▲ +5.7 pp |
| 2012 | -52.8% | R$2.02 Billion | R$3.08 Billion | R$6.98 Billion | ▲ +15.6 pp |
| 2011 | -68.4% | R$1.88 Billion | R$3.16 Billion | R$5.89 Billion | ▼ -34.3 pp |
| 2010 | -34.2% | R$2.38 Billion | R$3.19 Billion | R$5.37 Billion | ▼ -88.8 pp |
| 2009 | 54.7% | R$2.12 Billion | R$962.19 Million | R$4.76 Billion | ▼ -38.2 pp |
| 2008 | 92.9% | R$1.63 Billion | R$115.66 Million | R$4.24 Billion | ▼ -2.6 pp |
| 2007 | 95.5% | R$1.54 Billion | R$68.73 Million | R$4.53 Billion | ▼ -0.5 pp |
| 2006 | 96.1% | R$1.30 Billion | R$50.92 Million | R$4.07 Billion | ▲ +99.3 pp |
| 2005 | -3.2% | R$1.15 Billion | R$1.19 Billion | R$4.01 Billion | ▼ -80.2 pp |
| 2004 | 77.0% | R$1.69 Billion | R$389.31 Million | R$4.08 Billion | ▼ -9.7 pp |
| 2003 | 86.7% | R$1.85 Billion | R$245.16 Million | R$4.99 Billion | ▼ -0.5 pp |
| 2002 | 87.2% | R$2.03 Billion | R$258.93 Million | R$5.96 Billion | ▼ -12.8 pp |
| 2001 | 100.0% | R$1.87 Billion | R$0.00 | R$4.72 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2000 | 100.0% | R$2.45 Billion | R$0.00 | R$4.67 Billion | — |