Lakeland Financial Corporation (LKFN) — Capital Reinvestment Ratio
Lakeland Financial Corporation (LKFN) has a Capital Reinvestment Ratio of 0.14x as of September 2025, meaning it reinvests 0% of its operating cash flow ($36.07 Million) in capital expenditures ($5.01 Million). Check Lakeland Financial Corporation (LKFN) tangible net worth to evaluate the tangible quality of the company's equity base.
Capital Reinvestment Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Capital Expenditures
Data as of
Lakeland Financial Corporation Capital Reinvestment Ratio (1994–2024)
This chart tracks Lakeland Financial Corporation's Capital Reinvestment Ratio across 31 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see LKFN operating cash flow.
Annual Capital Reinvestment Ratio for Lakeland Financial Corporation (1994–2024)
Year-by-year Capital Reinvestment Ratio for Lakeland Financial Corporation from 1994 to 2024. See LKFN FCF generation index to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
| Year | Reinvestment Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Capital Expenditures | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.08x | $102.48 Million | $8.63 Million | ▲ +60.3% |
| 2023 | 0.05x | $113.98 Million | $5.99 Million | ▲ +84.6% |
| 2022 | 0.03x | $169.34 Million | $4.82 Million | ▼ -47.5% |
| 2021 | 0.05x | $113.77 Million | $6.17 Million | ▼ -17.3% |
| 2020 | 0.07x | $87.23 Million | $5.72 Million | ▼ -18.0% |
| 2019 | 0.08x | $100.04 Million | $8.00 Million | ▲ +5.3% |
| 2018 | 0.08x | $104.97 Million | $7.97 Million | ▼ -38.8% |
| 2017 | 0.12x | $77.24 Million | $9.58 Million | ▼ -21.5% |
| 2016 | 0.16x | $62.20 Million | $9.82 Million | ▼ -3.9% |
| 2015 | 0.16x | $55.78 Million | $9.17 Million | ▲ +36.1% |
| 2014 | 0.12x | $54.38 Million | $6.57 Million | ▲ +1.3% |
| 2013 | 0.12x | $62.97 Million | $7.50 Million | ▲ +108.0% |
| 2012 | 0.06x | $50.59 Million | $2.90 Million | ▼ -55.8% |
| 2011 | 0.13x | $51.40 Million | $6.66 Million | ▲ +95.6% |
| 2010 | 0.07x | $45.70 Million | $3.03 Million | ▲ +21.9% |
| 2009 | 0.05x | $24.26 Million | $1.32 Million | ▼ -68.4% |
| 2008 | 0.17x | $29.35 Million | $5.04 Million | ▲ +39.3% |
| 2007 | 0.12x | $33.04 Million | $4.07 Million | ▲ +10.5% |
| 2006 | 0.11x | $20.19 Million | $2.25 Million | ▲ +130.6% |
| 2005 | 0.05x | $26.00 Million | $1.26 Million | ▲ +3.9% |
| 2004 | 0.05x | $23.58 Million | $1.10 Million | ▼ -67.2% |
| 2003 | 0.14x | $25.54 Million | $3.63 Million | ▲ +8.5% |
| 2002 | 0.13x | $21.72 Million | $2.84 Million | ▼ -39.6% |
| 2001 | 0.22x | $6.81 Million | $1.48 Million | ▲ +40.0% |
| 2000 | 0.15x | $15.21 Million | $2.35 Million | ▼ -38.2% |
| 1999 | 0.25x | $15.65 Million | $3.92 Million | ▼ -61.2% |
| 1998 | 0.65x | $6.20 Million | $4.00 Million | ▲ +4.4% |
| 1997 | 0.62x | $8.90 Million | $5.50 Million | ▲ +24.9% |
| 1996 | 0.49x | $7.19 Million | $3.56 Million | ▲ +8.9% |
| 1995 | 0.45x | $8.03 Million | $3.65 Million | ▲ +87.5% |
| 1994 | 0.24x | $10.28 Million | $2.49 Million | — |