Lakeland Financial Corporation (LKFN) — Cash Flow Quality Index
Lakeland Financial Corporation (LKFN) has a Cash Flow Quality Index of 1.37x as of September 2025. Operating cash flow of $36.07 Million exceeds net income of $26.40 Million, indicating high earnings quality where cash backs reported profits. Explore LKFN long-term investments to assets to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
Cash Flow Quality Index
Operating Cash Flow
Net Income
Data as of
Lakeland Financial Corporation Cash Flow Quality Index (1994–2024)
Historical Cash Flow Quality Index for Lakeland Financial Corporation across 31 annual periods. Values consistently above 1.0x indicate high-quality earnings. Check tangible net worth ratio of Lakeland Financial Corporation to evaluate the tangible quality of the company's equity base.
Annual Cash Flow Quality Index for Lakeland Financial Corporation (1994–2024)
Year-by-year earnings quality comparison for Lakeland Financial Corporation. For live market cap and the full company financial profile, see market cap of Lakeland Financial Corporation.
| Year | Quality Index | Operating CF (USD) | Net Income | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 1.10x | $102.48 Million | $93.48 Million | ▼ -9.8% |
| 2023 | 1.22x | $113.98 Million | $93.77 Million | ▼ -25.5% |
| 2022 | 1.63x | $169.34 Million | $103.82 Million | ▲ +37.3% |
| 2021 | 1.19x | $113.77 Million | $95.73 Million | ▲ +14.9% |
| 2020 | 1.03x | $87.23 Million | $84.34 Million | ▼ -10.0% |
| 2019 | 1.15x | $100.04 Million | $87.05 Million | ▼ -12.0% |
| 2018 | 1.31x | $104.97 Million | $80.41 Million | ▼ -3.1% |
| 2017 | 1.35x | $77.24 Million | $57.33 Million | ▲ +12.8% |
| 2016 | 1.19x | $62.20 Million | $52.08 Million | ▼ -0.7% |
| 2015 | 1.20x | $55.78 Million | $46.37 Million | ▼ -3.1% |
| 2014 | 1.24x | $54.38 Million | $43.80 Million | ▼ -23.4% |
| 2013 | 1.62x | $62.97 Million | $38.84 Million | ▲ +13.4% |
| 2012 | 1.43x | $50.59 Million | $35.39 Million | ▼ -14.7% |
| 2011 | 1.68x | $51.40 Million | $30.66 Million | ▼ -10.0% |
| 2010 | 1.86x | $45.70 Million | $24.54 Million | ▲ +45.7% |
| 2009 | 1.28x | $24.26 Million | $18.98 Million | ▼ -14.2% |
| 2008 | 1.49x | $29.35 Million | $19.70 Million | ▼ -13.4% |
| 2007 | 1.72x | $33.04 Million | $19.21 Million | ▲ +59.5% |
| 2006 | 1.08x | $20.19 Million | $18.72 Million | ▼ -25.5% |
| 2005 | 1.45x | $26.00 Million | $17.96 Million | ▼ -10.7% |
| 2004 | 1.62x | $23.58 Million | $14.54 Million | ▼ -12.0% |
| 2003 | 1.84x | $25.54 Million | $13.87 Million | ▲ +4.9% |
| 2002 | 1.76x | $21.72 Million | $12.37 Million | ▲ +160.8% |
| 2001 | 0.67x | $6.81 Million | $10.11 Million | ▼ -58.7% |
| 2000 | 1.63x | $15.21 Million | $9.32 Million | ▼ -13.3% |
| 1999 | 1.88x | $15.65 Million | $8.32 Million | ▲ +139.7% |
| 1998 | 0.78x | $6.20 Million | $7.90 Million | ▼ -33.9% |
| 1997 | 1.19x | $8.90 Million | $7.50 Million | ▲ +6.3% |
| 1996 | 1.12x | $7.19 Million | $6.44 Million | ▼ -21.6% |
| 1995 | 1.42x | $8.03 Million | $5.64 Million | ▼ -29.0% |
| 1994 | 2.00x | $10.28 Million | $5.13 Million | — |