Lakeland Financial Corporation (LKFN) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Lakeland Financial Corporation (LKFN) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.01x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $36.07 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($6.15 Billion) in one year. Explore Lakeland Financial Corporation (LKFN) investment intensity to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Lakeland Financial Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1994–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Lakeland Financial Corporation across 31 annual periods. Also explore Lakeland Financial Corporation assets under control for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Lakeland Financial Corporation (1994–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Lakeland Financial Corporation. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see LKFN company net worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.02x | $102.48 Million | $5.99 Billion | ▼ -11.9% |
| 2023 | 0.02x | $113.98 Million | $5.87 Billion | ▼ -32.8% |
| 2022 | 0.03x | $169.34 Million | $5.86 Billion | ▲ +48.6% |
| 2021 | 0.02x | $113.77 Million | $5.85 Billion | ▲ +15.3% |
| 2020 | 0.02x | $87.23 Million | $5.17 Billion | ▼ -26.7% |
| 2019 | 0.02x | $100.04 Million | $4.35 Billion | ▼ -4.6% |
| 2018 | 0.02x | $104.97 Million | $4.35 Billion | ▲ +31.6% |
| 2017 | 0.02x | $77.24 Million | $4.21 Billion | ▲ +13.8% |
| 2016 | 0.02x | $62.20 Million | $3.86 Billion | ▼ -2.6% |
| 2015 | 0.02x | $55.78 Million | $3.37 Billion | ▼ -6.3% |
| 2014 | 0.02x | $54.38 Million | $3.08 Billion | ▼ -20.0% |
| 2013 | 0.02x | $62.97 Million | $2.85 Billion | ▲ +20.6% |
| 2012 | 0.02x | $50.59 Million | $2.77 Billion | ▼ -6.9% |
| 2011 | 0.02x | $51.40 Million | $2.62 Billion | ▲ +4.7% |
| 2010 | 0.02x | $45.70 Million | $2.43 Billion | ▲ +77.3% |
| 2009 | 0.01x | $24.26 Million | $2.29 Billion | ▼ -19.6% |
| 2008 | 0.01x | $29.35 Million | $2.23 Billion | ▼ -26.5% |
| 2007 | 0.02x | $33.04 Million | $1.84 Billion | ▲ +51.5% |
| 2006 | 0.01x | $20.19 Million | $1.71 Billion | ▼ -30.8% |
| 2005 | 0.02x | $26.00 Million | $1.52 Billion | ▼ -2.1% |
| 2004 | 0.02x | $23.58 Million | $1.35 Billion | ▼ -19.3% |
| 2003 | 0.02x | $25.54 Million | $1.18 Billion | ▲ +15.8% |
| 2002 | 0.02x | $21.72 Million | $1.16 Billion | ▲ +191.5% |
| 2001 | 0.01x | $6.81 Million | $1.06 Billion | ▼ -54.4% |
| 2000 | 0.01x | $15.21 Million | $1.08 Billion | ▼ -11.6% |
| 1999 | 0.02x | $15.65 Million | $985.65 Million | ▲ +136.5% |
| 1998 | 0.01x | $6.20 Million | $923.70 Million | ▼ -43.6% |
| 1997 | 0.01x | $8.90 Million | $748.20 Million | ▲ +1.7% |
| 1996 | 0.01x | $7.19 Million | $614.51 Million | ▼ -22.5% |
| 1995 | 0.02x | $8.03 Million | $531.83 Million | ▼ -31.3% |
| 1994 | 0.02x | $10.28 Million | $467.07 Million | — |