Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) (ERIC-A) — Cash Flow Quality Index
Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) (ERIC-A) has a Cash Flow Quality Index of 1.93x as of December 2025. Operating cash flow of Skr16.51 Billion exceeds net income of Skr8.56 Billion, indicating high earnings quality where cash backs reported profits. Explore Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) operating cash flow efficiency to assess how effectively this company generates cash.
Cash Flow Quality Index
Operating Cash Flow
Net Income
Data as of
Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) Cash Flow Quality Index (1991–2025)
Historical Cash Flow Quality Index for Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) across 28 annual periods. Values consistently above 1.0x indicate high-quality earnings. Check Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) investment reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Annual Cash Flow Quality Index for Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) (1991–2025)
Year-by-year earnings quality comparison for Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ). For live market cap and the full company financial profile, see Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) (ERIC-A) market capitalisation.
| Year | Quality Index | Operating CF (SEK) | Net Income | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1.16x | Skr32.95 Billion | Skr28.43 Billion | ▼ -99.1% |
| 2024 | 123.69x | Skr46.26 Billion | Skr374.00 Million | ▲ +7559.7% |
| 2022 | 1.61x | Skr30.86 Billion | Skr19.11 Billion | ▼ -5.0% |
| 2021 | 1.70x | Skr39.06 Billion | Skr22.98 Billion | ▲ +3.5% |
| 2020 | 1.64x | Skr28.93 Billion | Skr17.62 Billion | ▼ -82.1% |
| 2019 | 9.17x | Skr16.87 Billion | Skr1.84 Billion | ▲ +24.0% |
| 2016 | 7.39x | Skr14.01 Billion | Skr1.90 Billion | ▲ +390.8% |
| 2015 | 1.51x | Skr20.60 Billion | Skr13.67 Billion | ▼ -10.2% |
| 2014 | 1.68x | Skr18.70 Billion | Skr11.14 Billion | ▲ +17.5% |
| 2013 | 1.43x | Skr17.39 Billion | Skr12.17 Billion | ▼ -61.5% |
| 2012 | 3.71x | Skr22.03 Billion | Skr5.94 Billion | ▲ +367.2% |
| 2011 | 0.79x | Skr9.98 Billion | Skr12.57 Billion | ▼ -66.4% |
| 2010 | 2.37x | Skr26.58 Billion | Skr11.23 Billion | ▲ +15.0% |
| 2008 | 2.06x | Skr24.00 Billion | Skr11.67 Billion | ▲ +137.0% |
| 2007 | 0.87x | Skr19.25 Billion | Skr22.17 Billion | ▲ +23.3% |
| 2006 | 0.70x | Skr18.43 Billion | Skr26.18 Billion | ▲ +2.7% |
| 2005 | 0.69x | Skr16.66 Billion | Skr24.30 Billion | ▼ -42.0% |
| 2004 | 1.18x | Skr22.63 Billion | Skr19.15 Billion | ▲ +329.0% |
| 2000 | -0.52x | Skr-10.93 Billion | Skr21.17 Billion | ▼ -148.4% |
| 1999 | 1.07x | Skr12.91 Billion | Skr12.12 Billion | ▲ +88.0% |
| 1998 | 0.57x | Skr7.40 Billion | Skr13.05 Billion | ▼ -54.6% |
| 1997 | 1.25x | Skr14.98 Billion | Skr12.00 Billion | ▼ -4.6% |
| 1996 | 1.31x | Skr9.29 Billion | Skr7.10 Billion | ▲ +152.1% |
| 1995 | 0.52x | Skr2.80 Billion | Skr5.39 Billion | ▼ -78.3% |
| 1994 | 2.39x | Skr9.44 Billion | Skr3.94 Billion | ▲ +26.8% |
| 1993 | 1.89x | Skr5.35 Billion | Skr2.84 Billion | ▼ -39.1% |
| 1992 | 3.10x | Skr1.48 Billion | Skr478.64 Million | ▼ -22.7% |
| 1991 | 4.01x | Skr3.58 Billion | Skr892.16 Million | — |