Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) (ERIC-A) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) (ERIC-A) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.10x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of Skr16.51 Billion could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (Skr168.96 Billion) in one year. See Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) (ERIC-A) flexibility index to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1991–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) across 35 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash efficiency ratio of Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ).
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) (1991–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ). Check Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) (ERIC-A) cash flow quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (SEK) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.20x | Skr32.95 Billion | Skr168.96 Billion | ▼ -15.9% |
| 2024 | 0.23x | Skr46.26 Billion | Skr199.39 Billion | ▲ +587.7% |
| 2023 | 0.03x | Skr7.18 Billion | Skr212.73 Billion | ▼ -76.4% |
| 2022 | 0.14x | Skr30.86 Billion | Skr216.23 Billion | ▼ -27.5% |
| 2021 | 0.20x | Skr39.06 Billion | Skr198.51 Billion | ▲ +26.7% |
| 2020 | 0.16x | Skr28.93 Billion | Skr186.35 Billion | ▲ +79.0% |
| 2019 | 0.09x | Skr16.87 Billion | Skr194.50 Billion | ▲ +68.1% |
| 2018 | 0.05x | Skr9.34 Billion | Skr180.99 Billion | ▼ -13.8% |
| 2017 | 0.06x | Skr9.60 Billion | Skr160.37 Billion | ▼ -39.0% |
| 2016 | 0.10x | Skr14.01 Billion | Skr142.85 Billion | ▼ -34.8% |
| 2015 | 0.15x | Skr20.60 Billion | Skr137.00 Billion | ▲ +19.2% |
| 2014 | 0.13x | Skr18.70 Billion | Skr148.25 Billion | ▼ -7.5% |
| 2013 | 0.14x | Skr17.39 Billion | Skr127.57 Billion | ▼ -15.5% |
| 2012 | 0.16x | Skr22.03 Billion | Skr136.51 Billion | ▲ +118.4% |
| 2011 | 0.07x | Skr9.98 Billion | Skr135.08 Billion | ▼ -62.5% |
| 2010 | 0.20x | Skr26.58 Billion | Skr135.03 Billion | ▲ +251.6% |
| 2009 | -0.13x | Skr-3.77 Billion | Skr29.05 Billion | ▼ -177.7% |
| 2008 | 0.17x | Skr24.00 Billion | Skr143.60 Billion | ▼ -4.2% |
| 2007 | 0.17x | Skr19.25 Billion | Skr110.27 Billion | ▼ -11.2% |
| 2006 | 0.20x | Skr18.43 Billion | Skr93.78 Billion | ▲ +21.8% |
| 2005 | 0.16x | Skr16.66 Billion | Skr103.24 Billion | ▼ -24.9% |
| 2004 | 0.21x | Skr22.63 Billion | Skr105.38 Billion | ▲ +12.3% |
| 2003 | 0.19x | Skr22.85 Billion | Skr119.48 Billion | ▲ +350.6% |
| 2002 | -0.08x | Skr-10.11 Billion | Skr132.46 Billion | ▼ -1892.8% |
| 2001 | 0.00x | Skr-681.05 Million | Skr177.86 Billion | ▲ +94.5% |
| 2000 | -0.07x | Skr-10.93 Billion | Skr156.99 Billion | ▼ -170.7% |
| 1999 | 0.10x | Skr12.91 Billion | Skr131.14 Billion | ▲ +36.3% |
| 1998 | 0.07x | Skr7.40 Billion | Skr102.37 Billion | ▼ -56.2% |
| 1997 | 0.16x | Skr14.98 Billion | Skr90.87 Billion | ▲ +21.0% |
| 1996 | 0.14x | Skr9.29 Billion | Skr68.24 Billion | ▲ +164.6% |
| 1995 | 0.05x | Skr2.80 Billion | Skr54.32 Billion | ▼ -73.9% |
| 1994 | 0.20x | Skr9.44 Billion | Skr47.86 Billion | ▲ +62.9% |
| 1993 | 0.12x | Skr5.35 Billion | Skr44.20 Billion | ▲ +200.9% |
| 1992 | 0.04x | Skr1.48 Billion | Skr36.84 Billion | ▼ -65.1% |
| 1991 | 0.12x | Skr3.58 Billion | Skr31.04 Billion | — |