Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) (ERIC-A) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) (ERIC-A) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.10x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of Skr16.51 Billion could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (Skr168.96 Billion) in one year. See Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) (ERIC-A) free cash flow to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1991–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) across 35 annual periods. Also explore net asset momentum of Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) (1991–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ). For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) (ERIC-A) total market value.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (SEK) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.20x | Skr32.95 Billion | Skr168.96 Billion | ▼ -15.9% |
| 2024 | 0.23x | Skr46.26 Billion | Skr199.39 Billion | ▲ +587.7% |
| 2023 | 0.03x | Skr7.18 Billion | Skr212.73 Billion | ▼ -76.4% |
| 2022 | 0.14x | Skr30.86 Billion | Skr216.23 Billion | ▼ -27.5% |
| 2021 | 0.20x | Skr39.06 Billion | Skr198.51 Billion | ▲ +26.7% |
| 2020 | 0.16x | Skr28.93 Billion | Skr186.35 Billion | ▲ +79.0% |
| 2019 | 0.09x | Skr16.87 Billion | Skr194.50 Billion | ▲ +68.1% |
| 2018 | 0.05x | Skr9.34 Billion | Skr180.99 Billion | ▼ -13.8% |
| 2017 | 0.06x | Skr9.60 Billion | Skr160.37 Billion | ▼ -39.0% |
| 2016 | 0.10x | Skr14.01 Billion | Skr142.85 Billion | ▼ -34.8% |
| 2015 | 0.15x | Skr20.60 Billion | Skr137.00 Billion | ▲ +19.2% |
| 2014 | 0.13x | Skr18.70 Billion | Skr148.25 Billion | ▼ -7.5% |
| 2013 | 0.14x | Skr17.39 Billion | Skr127.57 Billion | ▼ -15.5% |
| 2012 | 0.16x | Skr22.03 Billion | Skr136.51 Billion | ▲ +118.4% |
| 2011 | 0.07x | Skr9.98 Billion | Skr135.08 Billion | ▼ -62.5% |
| 2010 | 0.20x | Skr26.58 Billion | Skr135.03 Billion | ▲ +251.6% |
| 2009 | -0.13x | Skr-3.77 Billion | Skr29.05 Billion | ▼ -177.7% |
| 2008 | 0.17x | Skr24.00 Billion | Skr143.60 Billion | ▼ -4.2% |
| 2007 | 0.17x | Skr19.25 Billion | Skr110.27 Billion | ▼ -11.2% |
| 2006 | 0.20x | Skr18.43 Billion | Skr93.78 Billion | ▲ +21.8% |
| 2005 | 0.16x | Skr16.66 Billion | Skr103.24 Billion | ▼ -24.9% |
| 2004 | 0.21x | Skr22.63 Billion | Skr105.38 Billion | ▲ +12.3% |
| 2003 | 0.19x | Skr22.85 Billion | Skr119.48 Billion | ▲ +350.6% |
| 2002 | -0.08x | Skr-10.11 Billion | Skr132.46 Billion | ▼ -1892.8% |
| 2001 | 0.00x | Skr-681.05 Million | Skr177.86 Billion | ▲ +94.5% |
| 2000 | -0.07x | Skr-10.93 Billion | Skr156.99 Billion | ▼ -170.7% |
| 1999 | 0.10x | Skr12.91 Billion | Skr131.14 Billion | ▲ +36.3% |
| 1998 | 0.07x | Skr7.40 Billion | Skr102.37 Billion | ▼ -56.2% |
| 1997 | 0.16x | Skr14.98 Billion | Skr90.87 Billion | ▲ +21.0% |
| 1996 | 0.14x | Skr9.29 Billion | Skr68.24 Billion | ▲ +164.6% |
| 1995 | 0.05x | Skr2.80 Billion | Skr54.32 Billion | ▼ -73.9% |
| 1994 | 0.20x | Skr9.44 Billion | Skr47.86 Billion | ▲ +62.9% |
| 1993 | 0.12x | Skr5.35 Billion | Skr44.20 Billion | ▲ +200.9% |
| 1992 | 0.04x | Skr1.48 Billion | Skr36.84 Billion | ▼ -65.1% |
| 1991 | 0.12x | Skr3.58 Billion | Skr31.04 Billion | — |