Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) (ERIC-A) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) (ERIC-A) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.10x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of Skr16.51 Billion could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (Skr168.96 Billion) in one year. Explore how much of Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ)'s assets are long-term investments to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1991–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) across 35 annual periods. Also explore ERIC-A current and non-current assets for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) (1991–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ). For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see ERIC-A market cap.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (SEK) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.20x | Skr32.95 Billion | Skr168.96 Billion | ▼ -15.9% |
| 2024 | 0.23x | Skr46.26 Billion | Skr199.39 Billion | ▲ +587.7% |
| 2023 | 0.03x | Skr7.18 Billion | Skr212.73 Billion | ▼ -76.4% |
| 2022 | 0.14x | Skr30.86 Billion | Skr216.23 Billion | ▼ -27.5% |
| 2021 | 0.20x | Skr39.06 Billion | Skr198.51 Billion | ▲ +26.7% |
| 2020 | 0.16x | Skr28.93 Billion | Skr186.35 Billion | ▲ +79.0% |
| 2019 | 0.09x | Skr16.87 Billion | Skr194.50 Billion | ▲ +68.1% |
| 2018 | 0.05x | Skr9.34 Billion | Skr180.99 Billion | ▼ -13.8% |
| 2017 | 0.06x | Skr9.60 Billion | Skr160.37 Billion | ▼ -39.0% |
| 2016 | 0.10x | Skr14.01 Billion | Skr142.85 Billion | ▼ -34.8% |
| 2015 | 0.15x | Skr20.60 Billion | Skr137.00 Billion | ▲ +19.2% |
| 2014 | 0.13x | Skr18.70 Billion | Skr148.25 Billion | ▼ -7.5% |
| 2013 | 0.14x | Skr17.39 Billion | Skr127.57 Billion | ▼ -15.5% |
| 2012 | 0.16x | Skr22.03 Billion | Skr136.51 Billion | ▲ +118.4% |
| 2011 | 0.07x | Skr9.98 Billion | Skr135.08 Billion | ▼ -62.5% |
| 2010 | 0.20x | Skr26.58 Billion | Skr135.03 Billion | ▲ +251.6% |
| 2009 | -0.13x | Skr-3.77 Billion | Skr29.05 Billion | ▼ -177.7% |
| 2008 | 0.17x | Skr24.00 Billion | Skr143.60 Billion | ▼ -4.2% |
| 2007 | 0.17x | Skr19.25 Billion | Skr110.27 Billion | ▼ -11.2% |
| 2006 | 0.20x | Skr18.43 Billion | Skr93.78 Billion | ▲ +21.8% |
| 2005 | 0.16x | Skr16.66 Billion | Skr103.24 Billion | ▼ -24.9% |
| 2004 | 0.21x | Skr22.63 Billion | Skr105.38 Billion | ▲ +12.3% |
| 2003 | 0.19x | Skr22.85 Billion | Skr119.48 Billion | ▲ +350.6% |
| 2002 | -0.08x | Skr-10.11 Billion | Skr132.46 Billion | ▼ -1892.8% |
| 2001 | 0.00x | Skr-681.05 Million | Skr177.86 Billion | ▲ +94.5% |
| 2000 | -0.07x | Skr-10.93 Billion | Skr156.99 Billion | ▼ -170.7% |
| 1999 | 0.10x | Skr12.91 Billion | Skr131.14 Billion | ▲ +36.3% |
| 1998 | 0.07x | Skr7.40 Billion | Skr102.37 Billion | ▼ -56.2% |
| 1997 | 0.16x | Skr14.98 Billion | Skr90.87 Billion | ▲ +21.0% |
| 1996 | 0.14x | Skr9.29 Billion | Skr68.24 Billion | ▲ +164.6% |
| 1995 | 0.05x | Skr2.80 Billion | Skr54.32 Billion | ▼ -73.9% |
| 1994 | 0.20x | Skr9.44 Billion | Skr47.86 Billion | ▲ +62.9% |
| 1993 | 0.12x | Skr5.35 Billion | Skr44.20 Billion | ▲ +200.9% |
| 1992 | 0.04x | Skr1.48 Billion | Skr36.84 Billion | ▼ -65.1% |
| 1991 | 0.12x | Skr3.58 Billion | Skr31.04 Billion | — |