Thomson Reuters Corp Cash Flow Quality Index
Thomson Reuters Corp cash flow quality index. Thomson Reuters Corp (TRI) has a Cash Flow Quality Index of 2.07x as of June 2026. Operating cash flow of CA$920.00 Million exceeds net income of CA$444.00 Million, indicating high earnings quality where cash backs reported profits. Explore how well can Thomson Reuters Corp service its debt to assess how comfortably operating cash covers total debt obligations.
Cash Flow Quality Index
Operating Cash Flow
Net Income
Data as of
Cash Flow Quality Index of Thomson Reuters Corp (1995–2025)
Cash flow quality index of Thomson Reuters Corp from 1995 to 2025. Historical Cash Flow Quality Index for Thomson Reuters Corp across 30 annual periods. Values consistently above 1.0x indicate high-quality earnings. See TRI net asset quality index to measure how much of total assets are equity-financed.
Thomson Reuters Corp Cash Flow Quality Index by Year (1995–2025)
Thomson Reuters Corp cash flow quality index by year from 1995 to 2025. Year-by-year earnings quality comparison for Thomson Reuters Corp. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see how efficiently does Thomson Reuters Corp generate cash.
| Year | Quality Index | Operating CF (CAD) | Net Income | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1.79x | CA$2.70 Billion | CA$1.51 Billion | ▲ +59.5% |
| 2024 | 1.12x | CA$2.46 Billion | CA$2.19 Billion | ▲ +26.7% |
| 2023 | 0.88x | CA$2.34 Billion | CA$2.65 Billion | ▼ -32.8% |
| 2022 | 1.32x | CA$1.92 Billion | CA$1.46 Billion | ▲ +322.2% |
| 2021 | 0.31x | CA$1.77 Billion | CA$5.69 Billion | ▼ -79.5% |
| 2020 | 1.52x | CA$1.75 Billion | CA$1.15 Billion | ▲ +239.7% |
| 2019 | 0.45x | CA$702.00 Million | CA$1.57 Billion | ▼ -96.1% |
| 2018 | 11.46x | CA$2.06 Billion | CA$180.00 Million | ▲ +725.4% |
| 2017 | 1.39x | CA$2.03 Billion | CA$1.46 Billion | ▼ -50.9% |
| 2016 | 2.83x | CA$2.98 Billion | CA$1.06 Billion | ▲ +30.5% |
| 2015 | 2.16x | CA$2.84 Billion | CA$1.31 Billion | ▲ +79.2% |
| 2014 | 1.21x | CA$2.37 Billion | CA$1.96 Billion | ▼ -89.4% |
| 2013 | 11.37x | CA$2.10 Billion | CA$185.00 Million | ▲ +792.5% |
| 2012 | 1.27x | CA$2.70 Billion | CA$2.12 Billion | ▼ -55.2% |
| 2010 | 2.85x | CA$2.65 Billion | CA$933.00 Million | ▼ -7.5% |
| 2009 | 3.07x | CA$2.67 Billion | CA$867.00 Million | ▲ +56.5% |
| 2008 | 1.97x | CA$2.76 Billion | CA$1.41 Billion | ▲ +333.3% |
| 2007 | 0.45x | CA$1.82 Billion | CA$4.00 Billion | ▼ -76.1% |
| 2006 | 1.90x | CA$2.12 Billion | CA$1.12 Billion | ▼ -6.5% |
| 2005 | 2.03x | CA$1.88 Billion | CA$926.00 Million | ▼ -3.1% |
| 2004 | 2.10x | CA$1.81 Billion | CA$863.00 Million | ▲ +6.9% |
| 2003 | 1.96x | CA$1.65 Billion | CA$844.00 Million | ▼ -29.8% |
| 2002 | 2.79x | CA$1.69 Billion | CA$606.00 Million | ▲ +13.0% |
| 2001 | 2.47x | CA$1.62 Billion | CA$657.00 Million | ▲ +182.1% |
| 2000 | 0.88x | CA$1.10 Billion | CA$1.25 Billion | ▼ -56.1% |
| 1999 | 1.99x | CA$1.12 Billion | CA$560.03 Million | ▲ +303.8% |
| 1998 | 0.49x | CA$898.06 Million | CA$1.82 Billion | ▼ -76.0% |
| 1997 | 2.06x | CA$1.19 Billion | CA$579.01 Million | ▲ +23.3% |
| 1996 | 1.67x | CA$968.92 Million | CA$580.96 Million | ▲ +102.8% |
| 1995 | 0.82x | CA$657.43 Million | CA$799.56 Million | — |