Thomson Reuters Corp (TRI) — Cash Flow Quality Index
Thomson Reuters Corp (TRI) has a Cash Flow Quality Index of 2.27x as of December 2025. Operating cash flow of CA$767.87 Million exceeds net income of CA$338.12 Million, indicating high earnings quality where cash backs reported profits. Explore Thomson Reuters Corp long-term investment allocation to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
Cash Flow Quality Index
Operating Cash Flow
Net Income
Data as of
Thomson Reuters Corp Cash Flow Quality Index (1995–2025)
Historical Cash Flow Quality Index for Thomson Reuters Corp across 30 annual periods. Values consistently above 1.0x indicate high-quality earnings. Check TRI goodwill-adjusted equity ratio to evaluate the tangible quality of the company's equity base.
Annual Cash Flow Quality Index for Thomson Reuters Corp (1995–2025)
Year-by-year earnings quality comparison for Thomson Reuters Corp. For live market cap and the full company financial profile, see how much is Thomson Reuters Corp worth.
| Year | Quality Index | Operating CF (CAD) | Net Income | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1.79x | CA$2.70 Billion | CA$1.51 Billion | ▲ +59.5% |
| 2024 | 1.12x | CA$2.46 Billion | CA$2.19 Billion | ▲ +26.7% |
| 2023 | 0.88x | CA$2.34 Billion | CA$2.65 Billion | ▼ -32.8% |
| 2022 | 1.32x | CA$1.92 Billion | CA$1.46 Billion | ▲ +322.2% |
| 2021 | 0.31x | CA$1.77 Billion | CA$5.69 Billion | ▼ -79.5% |
| 2020 | 1.52x | CA$1.75 Billion | CA$1.15 Billion | ▲ +239.7% |
| 2019 | 0.45x | CA$702.00 Million | CA$1.57 Billion | ▼ -96.1% |
| 2018 | 11.46x | CA$2.06 Billion | CA$180.00 Million | ▲ +725.4% |
| 2017 | 1.39x | CA$2.03 Billion | CA$1.46 Billion | ▼ -50.9% |
| 2016 | 2.83x | CA$2.98 Billion | CA$1.06 Billion | ▲ +30.5% |
| 2015 | 2.16x | CA$2.84 Billion | CA$1.31 Billion | ▲ +79.2% |
| 2014 | 1.21x | CA$2.37 Billion | CA$1.96 Billion | ▼ -89.4% |
| 2013 | 11.37x | CA$2.10 Billion | CA$185.00 Million | ▲ +792.5% |
| 2012 | 1.27x | CA$2.70 Billion | CA$2.12 Billion | ▼ -55.2% |
| 2010 | 2.85x | CA$2.65 Billion | CA$933.00 Million | ▼ -7.5% |
| 2009 | 3.07x | CA$2.67 Billion | CA$867.00 Million | ▲ +56.5% |
| 2008 | 1.97x | CA$2.76 Billion | CA$1.41 Billion | ▲ +333.3% |
| 2007 | 0.45x | CA$1.82 Billion | CA$4.00 Billion | ▼ -76.1% |
| 2006 | 1.90x | CA$2.12 Billion | CA$1.12 Billion | ▼ -6.5% |
| 2005 | 2.03x | CA$1.88 Billion | CA$926.00 Million | ▼ -3.1% |
| 2004 | 2.10x | CA$1.81 Billion | CA$863.00 Million | ▲ +6.9% |
| 2003 | 1.96x | CA$1.65 Billion | CA$844.00 Million | ▼ -29.8% |
| 2002 | 2.79x | CA$1.69 Billion | CA$606.00 Million | ▲ +13.0% |
| 2001 | 2.47x | CA$1.62 Billion | CA$657.00 Million | ▲ +182.1% |
| 2000 | 0.88x | CA$1.10 Billion | CA$1.25 Billion | ▼ -56.1% |
| 1999 | 1.99x | CA$1.12 Billion | CA$560.03 Million | ▲ +303.8% |
| 1998 | 0.49x | CA$898.06 Million | CA$1.82 Billion | ▼ -76.0% |
| 1997 | 2.06x | CA$1.19 Billion | CA$579.01 Million | ▲ +23.3% |
| 1996 | 1.67x | CA$968.92 Million | CA$580.96 Million | ▲ +102.8% |
| 1995 | 0.82x | CA$657.43 Million | CA$799.56 Million | — |