Thomson Reuters Corp (TRI) — Cash Flow Quality Index
Thomson Reuters Corp (TRI) has a Cash Flow Quality Index of 2.07x as of June 2026. Operating cash flow of CA$920.00 Million exceeds net income of CA$444.00 Million, indicating high earnings quality where cash backs reported profits. Explore Thomson Reuters Corp (TRI) cash flow to debt to assess how comfortably operating cash covers total debt obligations.
Cash Flow Quality Index
Operating Cash Flow
Net Income
Data as of
Thomson Reuters Corp Cash Flow Quality Index (1995–2025)
Historical Cash Flow Quality Index for Thomson Reuters Corp across 30 annual periods. Values consistently above 1.0x indicate high-quality earnings. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Thomson Reuters Corp (TRI) cash conversion ratio.
Annual Cash Flow Quality Index for Thomson Reuters Corp (1995–2025)
Year-by-year earnings quality comparison for Thomson Reuters Corp.
| Year | Quality Index | Operating CF (CAD) | Net Income | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1.79x | CA$2.70 Billion | CA$1.51 Billion | ▲ +59.5% |
| 2024 | 1.12x | CA$2.46 Billion | CA$2.19 Billion | ▲ +26.7% |
| 2023 | 0.88x | CA$2.34 Billion | CA$2.65 Billion | ▼ -32.8% |
| 2022 | 1.32x | CA$1.92 Billion | CA$1.46 Billion | ▲ +322.2% |
| 2021 | 0.31x | CA$1.77 Billion | CA$5.69 Billion | ▼ -79.5% |
| 2020 | 1.52x | CA$1.75 Billion | CA$1.15 Billion | ▲ +239.7% |
| 2019 | 0.45x | CA$702.00 Million | CA$1.57 Billion | ▼ -96.1% |
| 2018 | 11.46x | CA$2.06 Billion | CA$180.00 Million | ▲ +725.4% |
| 2017 | 1.39x | CA$2.03 Billion | CA$1.46 Billion | ▼ -50.9% |
| 2016 | 2.83x | CA$2.98 Billion | CA$1.06 Billion | ▲ +30.5% |
| 2015 | 2.16x | CA$2.84 Billion | CA$1.31 Billion | ▲ +79.2% |
| 2014 | 1.21x | CA$2.37 Billion | CA$1.96 Billion | ▼ -89.4% |
| 2013 | 11.37x | CA$2.10 Billion | CA$185.00 Million | ▲ +792.5% |
| 2012 | 1.27x | CA$2.70 Billion | CA$2.12 Billion | ▼ -55.2% |
| 2010 | 2.85x | CA$2.65 Billion | CA$933.00 Million | ▼ -7.5% |
| 2009 | 3.07x | CA$2.67 Billion | CA$867.00 Million | ▲ +56.5% |
| 2008 | 1.97x | CA$2.76 Billion | CA$1.41 Billion | ▲ +333.3% |
| 2007 | 0.45x | CA$1.82 Billion | CA$4.00 Billion | ▼ -76.1% |
| 2006 | 1.90x | CA$2.12 Billion | CA$1.12 Billion | ▼ -6.5% |
| 2005 | 2.03x | CA$1.88 Billion | CA$926.00 Million | ▼ -3.1% |
| 2004 | 2.10x | CA$1.81 Billion | CA$863.00 Million | ▲ +6.9% |
| 2003 | 1.96x | CA$1.65 Billion | CA$844.00 Million | ▼ -29.8% |
| 2002 | 2.79x | CA$1.69 Billion | CA$606.00 Million | ▲ +13.0% |
| 2001 | 2.47x | CA$1.62 Billion | CA$657.00 Million | ▲ +182.1% |
| 2000 | 0.88x | CA$1.10 Billion | CA$1.25 Billion | ▼ -56.1% |
| 1999 | 1.99x | CA$1.12 Billion | CA$560.03 Million | ▲ +303.8% |
| 1998 | 0.49x | CA$898.06 Million | CA$1.82 Billion | ▼ -76.0% |
| 1997 | 2.06x | CA$1.19 Billion | CA$579.01 Million | ▲ +23.3% |
| 1996 | 1.67x | CA$968.92 Million | CA$580.96 Million | ▲ +102.8% |
| 1995 | 0.82x | CA$657.43 Million | CA$799.56 Million | — |