Thomson Reuters Corp (TRI) — Cash Flow Quality Index
Thomson Reuters Corp (TRI) has a Cash Flow Quality Index of 2.27x as of December 2025. Operating cash flow of CA$767.87 Million exceeds net income of CA$338.12 Million, indicating high earnings quality where cash backs reported profits. Explore TRI cash generation efficiency to assess how effectively this company generates cash.
Cash Flow Quality Index
Operating Cash Flow
Net Income
Data as of
Thomson Reuters Corp Cash Flow Quality Index (1995–2025)
Historical Cash Flow Quality Index for Thomson Reuters Corp across 30 annual periods. Values consistently above 1.0x indicate high-quality earnings. Check TRI cash reinvestment to operating cash ratio to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Annual Cash Flow Quality Index for Thomson Reuters Corp (1995–2025)
Year-by-year earnings quality comparison for Thomson Reuters Corp. For live market cap and the full company financial profile, see Thomson Reuters Corp (TRI) market capitalisation.
| Year | Quality Index | Operating CF (CAD) | Net Income | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1.79x | CA$2.70 Billion | CA$1.51 Billion | ▲ +59.5% |
| 2024 | 1.12x | CA$2.46 Billion | CA$2.19 Billion | ▲ +26.7% |
| 2023 | 0.88x | CA$2.34 Billion | CA$2.65 Billion | ▼ -32.8% |
| 2022 | 1.32x | CA$1.92 Billion | CA$1.46 Billion | ▲ +322.2% |
| 2021 | 0.31x | CA$1.77 Billion | CA$5.69 Billion | ▼ -79.5% |
| 2020 | 1.52x | CA$1.75 Billion | CA$1.15 Billion | ▲ +239.7% |
| 2019 | 0.45x | CA$702.00 Million | CA$1.57 Billion | ▼ -96.1% |
| 2018 | 11.46x | CA$2.06 Billion | CA$180.00 Million | ▲ +725.4% |
| 2017 | 1.39x | CA$2.03 Billion | CA$1.46 Billion | ▼ -50.9% |
| 2016 | 2.83x | CA$2.98 Billion | CA$1.06 Billion | ▲ +30.5% |
| 2015 | 2.16x | CA$2.84 Billion | CA$1.31 Billion | ▲ +79.2% |
| 2014 | 1.21x | CA$2.37 Billion | CA$1.96 Billion | ▼ -89.4% |
| 2013 | 11.37x | CA$2.10 Billion | CA$185.00 Million | ▲ +792.5% |
| 2012 | 1.27x | CA$2.70 Billion | CA$2.12 Billion | ▼ -55.2% |
| 2010 | 2.85x | CA$2.65 Billion | CA$933.00 Million | ▼ -7.5% |
| 2009 | 3.07x | CA$2.67 Billion | CA$867.00 Million | ▲ +56.5% |
| 2008 | 1.97x | CA$2.76 Billion | CA$1.41 Billion | ▲ +333.3% |
| 2007 | 0.45x | CA$1.82 Billion | CA$4.00 Billion | ▼ -76.1% |
| 2006 | 1.90x | CA$2.12 Billion | CA$1.12 Billion | ▼ -6.5% |
| 2005 | 2.03x | CA$1.88 Billion | CA$926.00 Million | ▼ -3.1% |
| 2004 | 2.10x | CA$1.81 Billion | CA$863.00 Million | ▲ +6.9% |
| 2003 | 1.96x | CA$1.65 Billion | CA$844.00 Million | ▼ -29.8% |
| 2002 | 2.79x | CA$1.69 Billion | CA$606.00 Million | ▲ +13.0% |
| 2001 | 2.47x | CA$1.62 Billion | CA$657.00 Million | ▲ +182.1% |
| 2000 | 0.88x | CA$1.10 Billion | CA$1.25 Billion | ▼ -56.1% |
| 1999 | 1.99x | CA$1.12 Billion | CA$560.03 Million | ▲ +303.8% |
| 1998 | 0.49x | CA$898.06 Million | CA$1.82 Billion | ▼ -76.0% |
| 1997 | 2.06x | CA$1.19 Billion | CA$579.01 Million | ▲ +23.3% |
| 1996 | 1.67x | CA$968.92 Million | CA$580.96 Million | ▲ +102.8% |
| 1995 | 0.82x | CA$657.43 Million | CA$799.56 Million | — |