Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri AS ORD (TCELL) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri AS ORD (TCELL) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.10x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of TL25.15 Billion could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (TL248.39 Billion) in one year. Explore long-term investment intensity of Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri AS ORD to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri AS ORD Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2000–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri AS ORD across 25 annual periods. Also explore Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri AS ORD balance sheet assets for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri AS ORD (2000–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri AS ORD. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see TCELL market cap overview.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (TRY) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.40x | TL63.26 Billion | TL157.31 Billion | ▲ +20.3% |
| 2023 | 0.33x | TL41.72 Billion | TL124.85 Billion | ▼ -6.5% |
| 2022 | 0.36x | TL25.15 Billion | TL70.37 Billion | ▼ -18.8% |
| 2021 | 0.44x | TL21.17 Billion | TL48.12 Billion | ▼ -4.1% |
| 2020 | 0.46x | TL14.09 Billion | TL30.71 Billion | ▲ +28.3% |
| 2019 | 0.36x | TL9.88 Billion | TL27.63 Billion | ▲ +63.8% |
| 2018 | 0.22x | TL5.83 Billion | TL26.71 Billion | ▲ +33.3% |
| 2017 | 0.16x | TL3.10 Billion | TL18.94 Billion | ▲ +108.8% |
| 2016 | 0.08x | TL1.22 Billion | TL15.53 Billion | ▼ -65.3% |
| 2015 | 0.23x | TL2.66 Billion | TL11.78 Billion | ▼ -15.1% |
| 2014 | 0.27x | TL801.82 Million | TL3.01 Billion | ▼ -17.8% |
| 2013 | 0.32x | TL993.99 Million | TL3.07 Billion | ▼ -9.4% |
| 2012 | 0.36x | TL1.19 Billion | TL3.32 Billion | ▲ +30.0% |
| 2011 | 0.27x | TL925.83 Million | TL3.37 Billion | ▼ -22.5% |
| 2010 | 0.35x | TL1.26 Billion | TL3.56 Billion | ▼ -6.2% |
| 2009 | 0.38x | TL1.29 Billion | TL3.42 Billion | ▼ -40.7% |
| 2008 | 0.64x | TL1.67 Billion | TL2.62 Billion | ▼ -24.9% |
| 2007 | 0.85x | TL2.16 Billion | TL2.54 Billion | ▼ -8.8% |
| 2006 | 0.93x | TL1.84 Billion | TL1.97 Billion | ▲ +32.5% |
| 2005 | 0.70x | TL1.14 Billion | TL1.63 Billion | ▲ +169.2% |
| 2004 | 0.26x | TL603.92 Million | TL2.31 Billion | ▼ -41.8% |
| 2003 | 0.45x | TL1.04 Billion | TL2.32 Billion | ▲ +40.3% |
| 2002 | 0.32x | TL608.85 Million | TL1.90 Billion | ▲ +149.4% |
| 2001 | 0.13x | TL288.70 Million | TL2.25 Billion | ▼ -4.4% |
| 2000 | 0.13x | TL347.63 Million | TL2.59 Billion | — |