Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri AS ORD (TCELL) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri AS ORD (TCELL) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.10x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of TL25.15 Billion could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (TL248.39 Billion) in one year. See Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri AS ORD free cash flow ratio to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri AS ORD Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2000–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri AS ORD across 25 annual periods. Also explore net asset momentum of Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri AS ORD to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri AS ORD (2000–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri AS ORD. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri AS ORD market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (TRY) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.40x | TL63.26 Billion | TL157.31 Billion | ▲ +20.3% |
| 2023 | 0.33x | TL41.72 Billion | TL124.85 Billion | ▼ -6.5% |
| 2022 | 0.36x | TL25.15 Billion | TL70.37 Billion | ▼ -18.8% |
| 2021 | 0.44x | TL21.17 Billion | TL48.12 Billion | ▼ -4.1% |
| 2020 | 0.46x | TL14.09 Billion | TL30.71 Billion | ▲ +28.3% |
| 2019 | 0.36x | TL9.88 Billion | TL27.63 Billion | ▲ +63.8% |
| 2018 | 0.22x | TL5.83 Billion | TL26.71 Billion | ▲ +33.3% |
| 2017 | 0.16x | TL3.10 Billion | TL18.94 Billion | ▲ +108.8% |
| 2016 | 0.08x | TL1.22 Billion | TL15.53 Billion | ▼ -65.3% |
| 2015 | 0.23x | TL2.66 Billion | TL11.78 Billion | ▼ -15.1% |
| 2014 | 0.27x | TL801.82 Million | TL3.01 Billion | ▼ -17.8% |
| 2013 | 0.32x | TL993.99 Million | TL3.07 Billion | ▼ -9.4% |
| 2012 | 0.36x | TL1.19 Billion | TL3.32 Billion | ▲ +30.0% |
| 2011 | 0.27x | TL925.83 Million | TL3.37 Billion | ▼ -22.5% |
| 2010 | 0.35x | TL1.26 Billion | TL3.56 Billion | ▼ -6.2% |
| 2009 | 0.38x | TL1.29 Billion | TL3.42 Billion | ▼ -40.7% |
| 2008 | 0.64x | TL1.67 Billion | TL2.62 Billion | ▼ -24.9% |
| 2007 | 0.85x | TL2.16 Billion | TL2.54 Billion | ▼ -8.8% |
| 2006 | 0.93x | TL1.84 Billion | TL1.97 Billion | ▲ +32.5% |
| 2005 | 0.70x | TL1.14 Billion | TL1.63 Billion | ▲ +169.2% |
| 2004 | 0.26x | TL603.92 Million | TL2.31 Billion | ▼ -41.8% |
| 2003 | 0.45x | TL1.04 Billion | TL2.32 Billion | ▲ +40.3% |
| 2002 | 0.32x | TL608.85 Million | TL1.90 Billion | ▲ +149.4% |
| 2001 | 0.13x | TL288.70 Million | TL2.25 Billion | ▼ -4.4% |
| 2000 | 0.13x | TL347.63 Million | TL2.59 Billion | — |