Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri AS ORD Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri AS ORD cash flow-to-debt ratio. Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri AS ORD (TCELL) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.10x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of TL25.15 Billion could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (TL248.39 Billion) in one year. Check Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri AS ORD cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri AS ORD (2000–2024)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri AS ORD from 2000 to 2024. Historical debt coverage capacity for Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri AS ORD across 25 annual periods. Check TCELL cash flow reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri AS ORD Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (2000–2024)
Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri AS ORD cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 2000 to 2024. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri AS ORD. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash flow conversion of Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri AS ORD.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (TRY) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.40x | TL63.26 Billion | TL157.31 Billion | ▲ +20.3% |
| 2023 | 0.33x | TL41.72 Billion | TL124.85 Billion | ▼ -6.5% |
| 2022 | 0.36x | TL25.15 Billion | TL70.37 Billion | ▼ -18.8% |
| 2021 | 0.44x | TL21.17 Billion | TL48.12 Billion | ▼ -4.1% |
| 2020 | 0.46x | TL14.09 Billion | TL30.71 Billion | ▲ +28.3% |
| 2019 | 0.36x | TL9.88 Billion | TL27.63 Billion | ▲ +63.8% |
| 2018 | 0.22x | TL5.83 Billion | TL26.71 Billion | ▲ +33.3% |
| 2017 | 0.16x | TL3.10 Billion | TL18.94 Billion | ▲ +108.8% |
| 2016 | 0.08x | TL1.22 Billion | TL15.53 Billion | ▼ -65.3% |
| 2015 | 0.23x | TL2.66 Billion | TL11.78 Billion | ▼ -15.1% |
| 2014 | 0.27x | TL801.82 Million | TL3.01 Billion | ▼ -17.8% |
| 2013 | 0.32x | TL993.99 Million | TL3.07 Billion | ▼ -9.4% |
| 2012 | 0.36x | TL1.19 Billion | TL3.32 Billion | ▲ +30.0% |
| 2011 | 0.27x | TL925.83 Million | TL3.37 Billion | ▼ -22.5% |
| 2010 | 0.35x | TL1.26 Billion | TL3.56 Billion | ▼ -6.2% |
| 2009 | 0.38x | TL1.29 Billion | TL3.42 Billion | ▼ -40.7% |
| 2008 | 0.64x | TL1.67 Billion | TL2.62 Billion | ▼ -24.9% |
| 2007 | 0.85x | TL2.16 Billion | TL2.54 Billion | ▼ -8.8% |
| 2006 | 0.93x | TL1.84 Billion | TL1.97 Billion | ▲ +32.5% |
| 2005 | 0.70x | TL1.14 Billion | TL1.63 Billion | ▲ +169.2% |
| 2004 | 0.26x | TL603.92 Million | TL2.31 Billion | ▼ -41.8% |
| 2003 | 0.45x | TL1.04 Billion | TL2.32 Billion | ▲ +40.3% |
| 2002 | 0.32x | TL608.85 Million | TL1.90 Billion | ▲ +149.4% |
| 2001 | 0.13x | TL288.70 Million | TL2.25 Billion | ▼ -4.4% |
| 2000 | 0.13x | TL347.63 Million | TL2.59 Billion | — |