Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri AS ORD (TCELL) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri AS ORD (TCELL) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.10x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of TL25.15 Billion could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (TL248.39 Billion) in one year. See Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri AS ORD (TCELL) financial flexibility to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri AS ORD Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2000–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri AS ORD across 25 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri AS ORD cash flow conversion.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri AS ORD (2000–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri AS ORD. Check Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri AS ORD cash earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (TRY) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.40x | TL63.26 Billion | TL157.31 Billion | ▲ +20.3% |
| 2023 | 0.33x | TL41.72 Billion | TL124.85 Billion | ▼ -6.5% |
| 2022 | 0.36x | TL25.15 Billion | TL70.37 Billion | ▼ -18.8% |
| 2021 | 0.44x | TL21.17 Billion | TL48.12 Billion | ▼ -4.1% |
| 2020 | 0.46x | TL14.09 Billion | TL30.71 Billion | ▲ +28.3% |
| 2019 | 0.36x | TL9.88 Billion | TL27.63 Billion | ▲ +63.8% |
| 2018 | 0.22x | TL5.83 Billion | TL26.71 Billion | ▲ +33.3% |
| 2017 | 0.16x | TL3.10 Billion | TL18.94 Billion | ▲ +108.8% |
| 2016 | 0.08x | TL1.22 Billion | TL15.53 Billion | ▼ -65.3% |
| 2015 | 0.23x | TL2.66 Billion | TL11.78 Billion | ▼ -15.1% |
| 2014 | 0.27x | TL801.82 Million | TL3.01 Billion | ▼ -17.8% |
| 2013 | 0.32x | TL993.99 Million | TL3.07 Billion | ▼ -9.4% |
| 2012 | 0.36x | TL1.19 Billion | TL3.32 Billion | ▲ +30.0% |
| 2011 | 0.27x | TL925.83 Million | TL3.37 Billion | ▼ -22.5% |
| 2010 | 0.35x | TL1.26 Billion | TL3.56 Billion | ▼ -6.2% |
| 2009 | 0.38x | TL1.29 Billion | TL3.42 Billion | ▼ -40.7% |
| 2008 | 0.64x | TL1.67 Billion | TL2.62 Billion | ▼ -24.9% |
| 2007 | 0.85x | TL2.16 Billion | TL2.54 Billion | ▼ -8.8% |
| 2006 | 0.93x | TL1.84 Billion | TL1.97 Billion | ▲ +32.5% |
| 2005 | 0.70x | TL1.14 Billion | TL1.63 Billion | ▲ +169.2% |
| 2004 | 0.26x | TL603.92 Million | TL2.31 Billion | ▼ -41.8% |
| 2003 | 0.45x | TL1.04 Billion | TL2.32 Billion | ▲ +40.3% |
| 2002 | 0.32x | TL608.85 Million | TL1.90 Billion | ▲ +149.4% |
| 2001 | 0.13x | TL288.70 Million | TL2.25 Billion | ▼ -4.4% |
| 2000 | 0.13x | TL347.63 Million | TL2.59 Billion | — |