Beasley Broadcast Group Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Beasley Broadcast Group Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Beasley Broadcast Group Inc (BBGI) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.01x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-3.16 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($372.28 Million) in one year. Check Beasley Broadcast Group Inc cash earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Beasley Broadcast Group Inc (1998–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Beasley Broadcast Group Inc from 1998 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Beasley Broadcast Group Inc across 28 annual periods. Check how aggressively does Beasley Broadcast Group Inc reinvest cash to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Beasley Broadcast Group Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1998–2025)
Beasley Broadcast Group Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1998 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Beasley Broadcast Group Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash efficiency ratio of Beasley Broadcast Group Inc.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.02x | $-8.47 Million | $372.28 Million | ▼ -146.4% |
| 2024 | -0.01x | $-3.71 Million | $401.99 Million | ▲ +16.1% |
| 2023 | -0.01x | $-4.68 Million | $425.29 Million | ▼ -148.5% |
| 2022 | 0.02x | $11.15 Million | $491.45 Million | ▲ +693.4% |
| 2021 | 0.00x | $-1.91 Million | $499.01 Million | ▼ -142.8% |
| 2020 | 0.01x | $4.21 Million | $471.51 Million | ▼ -79.7% |
| 2019 | 0.04x | $20.99 Million | $475.59 Million | ▼ -26.5% |
| 2018 | 0.06x | $24.39 Million | $406.05 Million | ▼ -21.0% |
| 2017 | 0.08x | $28.02 Million | $368.55 Million | ▲ +103.6% |
| 2016 | 0.04x | $17.15 Million | $459.18 Million | ▼ -53.8% |
| 2015 | 0.08x | $14.37 Million | $177.87 Million | ▼ -12.3% |
| 2014 | 0.09x | $16.91 Million | $183.65 Million | ▼ -21.1% |
| 2013 | 0.12x | $19.91 Million | $170.58 Million | ▲ +0.9% |
| 2012 | 0.12x | $20.40 Million | $176.32 Million | ▲ +1.5% |
| 2011 | 0.11x | $20.67 Million | $181.34 Million | ▲ +32.5% |
| 2010 | 0.09x | $16.41 Million | $190.79 Million | ▼ -99.9% |
| 2009 | 58.70x | $11.59 Billion | $197.49 Million | ▲ +57196.8% |
| 2008 | 0.10x | $22.24 Million | $217.11 Million | ▲ +36.9% |
| 2007 | 0.07x | $18.86 Million | $251.97 Million | ▼ -18.0% |
| 2006 | 0.09x | $19.21 Million | $210.38 Million | ▼ -14.0% |
| 2005 | 0.11x | $20.47 Million | $192.82 Million | ▼ -11.9% |
| 2004 | 0.12x | $24.74 Million | $205.23 Million | ▲ +23.6% |
| 2003 | 0.10x | $20.34 Million | $208.48 Million | ▲ +67.6% |
| 2002 | 0.06x | $13.27 Million | $227.91 Million | ▲ +62.5% |
| 2001 | 0.04x | $9.36 Million | $261.39 Million | ▼ -35.3% |
| 2000 | 0.06x | $7.70 Million | $139.20 Million | ▲ +45.2% |
| 1999 | 0.04x | $7.20 Million | $188.78 Million | ▲ +46.9% |
| 1998 | 0.03x | $4.90 Million | $188.80 Million | — |