Beasley Broadcast Group Inc (BBGI) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Beasley Broadcast Group Inc (BBGI) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.01x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-3.16 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($372.28 Million) in one year. Explore how much of Beasley Broadcast Group Inc's assets are long-term investments to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Beasley Broadcast Group Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1998–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Beasley Broadcast Group Inc across 28 annual periods. Also explore Beasley Broadcast Group Inc total assets for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Beasley Broadcast Group Inc (1998–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Beasley Broadcast Group Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Beasley Broadcast Group Inc market cap and net worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.02x | $-8.47 Million | $372.28 Million | ▼ -146.4% |
| 2024 | -0.01x | $-3.71 Million | $401.99 Million | ▲ +16.1% |
| 2023 | -0.01x | $-4.68 Million | $425.29 Million | ▼ -148.5% |
| 2022 | 0.02x | $11.15 Million | $491.45 Million | ▲ +693.4% |
| 2021 | 0.00x | $-1.91 Million | $499.01 Million | ▼ -142.8% |
| 2020 | 0.01x | $4.21 Million | $471.51 Million | ▼ -79.7% |
| 2019 | 0.04x | $20.99 Million | $475.59 Million | ▼ -26.5% |
| 2018 | 0.06x | $24.39 Million | $406.05 Million | ▼ -21.0% |
| 2017 | 0.08x | $28.02 Million | $368.55 Million | ▲ +103.6% |
| 2016 | 0.04x | $17.15 Million | $459.18 Million | ▼ -53.8% |
| 2015 | 0.08x | $14.37 Million | $177.87 Million | ▼ -12.3% |
| 2014 | 0.09x | $16.91 Million | $183.65 Million | ▼ -21.1% |
| 2013 | 0.12x | $19.91 Million | $170.58 Million | ▲ +0.9% |
| 2012 | 0.12x | $20.40 Million | $176.32 Million | ▲ +1.5% |
| 2011 | 0.11x | $20.67 Million | $181.34 Million | ▲ +32.5% |
| 2010 | 0.09x | $16.41 Million | $190.79 Million | ▼ -99.9% |
| 2009 | 58.70x | $11.59 Billion | $197.49 Million | ▲ +57196.8% |
| 2008 | 0.10x | $22.24 Million | $217.11 Million | ▲ +36.9% |
| 2007 | 0.07x | $18.86 Million | $251.97 Million | ▼ -18.0% |
| 2006 | 0.09x | $19.21 Million | $210.38 Million | ▼ -14.0% |
| 2005 | 0.11x | $20.47 Million | $192.82 Million | ▼ -11.9% |
| 2004 | 0.12x | $24.74 Million | $205.23 Million | ▲ +23.6% |
| 2003 | 0.10x | $20.34 Million | $208.48 Million | ▲ +67.6% |
| 2002 | 0.06x | $13.27 Million | $227.91 Million | ▲ +62.5% |
| 2001 | 0.04x | $9.36 Million | $261.39 Million | ▼ -35.3% |
| 2000 | 0.06x | $7.70 Million | $139.20 Million | ▲ +45.2% |
| 1999 | 0.04x | $7.20 Million | $188.78 Million | ▲ +46.9% |
| 1998 | 0.03x | $4.90 Million | $188.80 Million | — |