Beasley Broadcast Group Inc (BBGI) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Beasley Broadcast Group Inc (BBGI) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.01x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-3.16 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($372.28 Million) in one year. See how much free cash does Beasley Broadcast Group Inc generate to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Beasley Broadcast Group Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1998–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Beasley Broadcast Group Inc across 28 annual periods. Also explore BBGI net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Beasley Broadcast Group Inc (1998–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Beasley Broadcast Group Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Beasley Broadcast Group Inc market cap and net worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.02x | $-8.47 Million | $372.28 Million | ▼ -146.4% |
| 2024 | -0.01x | $-3.71 Million | $401.99 Million | ▲ +16.1% |
| 2023 | -0.01x | $-4.68 Million | $425.29 Million | ▼ -148.5% |
| 2022 | 0.02x | $11.15 Million | $491.45 Million | ▲ +693.4% |
| 2021 | 0.00x | $-1.91 Million | $499.01 Million | ▼ -142.8% |
| 2020 | 0.01x | $4.21 Million | $471.51 Million | ▼ -79.7% |
| 2019 | 0.04x | $20.99 Million | $475.59 Million | ▼ -26.5% |
| 2018 | 0.06x | $24.39 Million | $406.05 Million | ▼ -21.0% |
| 2017 | 0.08x | $28.02 Million | $368.55 Million | ▲ +103.6% |
| 2016 | 0.04x | $17.15 Million | $459.18 Million | ▼ -53.8% |
| 2015 | 0.08x | $14.37 Million | $177.87 Million | ▼ -12.3% |
| 2014 | 0.09x | $16.91 Million | $183.65 Million | ▼ -21.1% |
| 2013 | 0.12x | $19.91 Million | $170.58 Million | ▲ +0.9% |
| 2012 | 0.12x | $20.40 Million | $176.32 Million | ▲ +1.5% |
| 2011 | 0.11x | $20.67 Million | $181.34 Million | ▲ +32.5% |
| 2010 | 0.09x | $16.41 Million | $190.79 Million | ▼ -99.9% |
| 2009 | 58.70x | $11.59 Billion | $197.49 Million | ▲ +57196.8% |
| 2008 | 0.10x | $22.24 Million | $217.11 Million | ▲ +36.9% |
| 2007 | 0.07x | $18.86 Million | $251.97 Million | ▼ -18.0% |
| 2006 | 0.09x | $19.21 Million | $210.38 Million | ▼ -14.0% |
| 2005 | 0.11x | $20.47 Million | $192.82 Million | ▼ -11.9% |
| 2004 | 0.12x | $24.74 Million | $205.23 Million | ▲ +23.6% |
| 2003 | 0.10x | $20.34 Million | $208.48 Million | ▲ +67.6% |
| 2002 | 0.06x | $13.27 Million | $227.91 Million | ▲ +62.5% |
| 2001 | 0.04x | $9.36 Million | $261.39 Million | ▼ -35.3% |
| 2000 | 0.06x | $7.70 Million | $139.20 Million | ▲ +45.2% |
| 1999 | 0.04x | $7.20 Million | $188.78 Million | ▲ +46.9% |
| 1998 | 0.03x | $4.90 Million | $188.80 Million | — |