Electronic Arts Inc (EA) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Electronic Arts Inc (EA) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.09x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $580.00 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($6.37 Billion) in one year. See how financially flexible is Electronic Arts Inc to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Electronic Arts Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1990–2026)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Electronic Arts Inc across 37 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash flow conversion of Electronic Arts Inc.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Electronic Arts Inc (1990–2026)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Electronic Arts Inc. Check EA operating cash flow to net income to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.40x | $2.55 Billion | $6.37 Billion | ▲ +15.4% |
| 2025 | 0.35x | $2.08 Billion | $5.98 Billion | ▼ -11.3% |
| 2024 | 0.39x | $2.31 Billion | $5.91 Billion | ▲ +55.9% |
| 2023 | 0.25x | $1.55 Billion | $6.17 Billion | ▼ -18.3% |
| 2022 | 0.31x | $1.90 Billion | $6.17 Billion | ▼ -13.4% |
| 2021 | 0.35x | $1.93 Billion | $5.45 Billion | ▼ -27.9% |
| 2020 | 0.49x | $1.80 Billion | $3.65 Billion | ▲ +15.4% |
| 2019 | 0.43x | $1.55 Billion | $3.63 Billion | ▲ +0.6% |
| 2018 | 0.42x | $1.69 Billion | $3.99 Billion | ▲ +12.2% |
| 2017 | 0.38x | $1.38 Billion | $3.66 Billion | ▲ +13.0% |
| 2016 | 0.33x | $1.22 Billion | $3.65 Billion | ▼ -2.4% |
| 2015 | 0.34x | $1.07 Billion | $3.11 Billion | ▲ +58.7% |
| 2014 | 0.22x | $712.00 Million | $3.29 Billion | ▲ +87.0% |
| 2013 | 0.12x | $324.00 Million | $2.80 Billion | ▲ +26.6% |
| 2012 | 0.09x | $277.00 Million | $3.03 Billion | ▼ -32.5% |
| 2011 | 0.14x | $320.00 Million | $2.36 Billion | ▲ +70.7% |
| 2010 | 0.08x | $152.00 Million | $1.92 Billion | ▲ +920.2% |
| 2009 | 0.01x | $12.00 Million | $1.54 Billion | ▼ -96.0% |
| 2008 | 0.20x | $338.00 Million | $1.72 Billion | ▼ -44.9% |
| 2007 | 0.36x | $397.00 Million | $1.11 Billion | ▼ -42.2% |
| 2006 | 0.62x | $596.00 Million | $966.00 Million | ▼ -16.2% |
| 2005 | 0.74x | $634.00 Million | $861.00 Million | ▼ -20.5% |
| 2004 | 0.93x | $669.28 Million | $722.25 Million | ▼ -26.0% |
| 2003 | 1.25x | $714.45 Million | $570.88 Million | ▲ +98.9% |
| 2002 | 0.63x | $284.97 Million | $452.98 Million | ▲ +10.3% |
| 2001 | 0.57x | $193.94 Million | $340.03 Million | ▲ +233.8% |
| 2000 | 0.17x | $45.34 Million | $265.30 Million | ▼ -73.2% |
| 1999 | 0.64x | $150.80 Million | $236.30 Million | ▲ +46.8% |
| 1998 | 0.43x | $79.00 Million | $181.70 Million | ▼ -31.2% |
| 1997 | 0.63x | $80.60 Million | $127.50 Million | ▲ +821.7% |
| 1996 | 0.07x | $6.90 Million | $100.60 Million | ▼ -88.9% |
| 1995 | 0.62x | $63.80 Million | $103.00 Million | ▲ +48.8% |
| 1994 | 0.42x | $40.80 Million | $98.00 Million | ▼ -34.0% |
| 1993 | 0.63x | $42.70 Million | $67.70 Million | ▼ -12.9% |
| 1992 | 0.72x | $26.00 Million | $35.90 Million | ▲ +168.8% |
| 1991 | 0.27x | $5.20 Million | $19.30 Million | ▼ -61.5% |
| 1990 | 0.70x | $10.00 Million | $14.30 Million | — |