Electronic Arts Inc (EA) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Electronic Arts Inc (EA) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.09x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $580.00 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($6.37 Billion) in one year. See EA cash flow after capex ratio to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Electronic Arts Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1990–2026)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Electronic Arts Inc across 37 annual periods. Also explore EA shareholders equity momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Electronic Arts Inc (1990–2026)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Electronic Arts Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Electronic Arts Inc (EA) market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.40x | $2.55 Billion | $6.37 Billion | ▲ +15.4% |
| 2025 | 0.35x | $2.08 Billion | $5.98 Billion | ▼ -11.3% |
| 2024 | 0.39x | $2.31 Billion | $5.91 Billion | ▲ +55.9% |
| 2023 | 0.25x | $1.55 Billion | $6.17 Billion | ▼ -18.3% |
| 2022 | 0.31x | $1.90 Billion | $6.17 Billion | ▼ -13.4% |
| 2021 | 0.35x | $1.93 Billion | $5.45 Billion | ▼ -27.9% |
| 2020 | 0.49x | $1.80 Billion | $3.65 Billion | ▲ +15.4% |
| 2019 | 0.43x | $1.55 Billion | $3.63 Billion | ▲ +0.6% |
| 2018 | 0.42x | $1.69 Billion | $3.99 Billion | ▲ +12.2% |
| 2017 | 0.38x | $1.38 Billion | $3.66 Billion | ▲ +13.0% |
| 2016 | 0.33x | $1.22 Billion | $3.65 Billion | ▼ -2.4% |
| 2015 | 0.34x | $1.07 Billion | $3.11 Billion | ▲ +58.7% |
| 2014 | 0.22x | $712.00 Million | $3.29 Billion | ▲ +87.0% |
| 2013 | 0.12x | $324.00 Million | $2.80 Billion | ▲ +26.6% |
| 2012 | 0.09x | $277.00 Million | $3.03 Billion | ▼ -32.5% |
| 2011 | 0.14x | $320.00 Million | $2.36 Billion | ▲ +70.7% |
| 2010 | 0.08x | $152.00 Million | $1.92 Billion | ▲ +920.2% |
| 2009 | 0.01x | $12.00 Million | $1.54 Billion | ▼ -96.0% |
| 2008 | 0.20x | $338.00 Million | $1.72 Billion | ▼ -44.9% |
| 2007 | 0.36x | $397.00 Million | $1.11 Billion | ▼ -42.2% |
| 2006 | 0.62x | $596.00 Million | $966.00 Million | ▼ -16.2% |
| 2005 | 0.74x | $634.00 Million | $861.00 Million | ▼ -20.5% |
| 2004 | 0.93x | $669.28 Million | $722.25 Million | ▼ -26.0% |
| 2003 | 1.25x | $714.45 Million | $570.88 Million | ▲ +98.9% |
| 2002 | 0.63x | $284.97 Million | $452.98 Million | ▲ +10.3% |
| 2001 | 0.57x | $193.94 Million | $340.03 Million | ▲ +233.8% |
| 2000 | 0.17x | $45.34 Million | $265.30 Million | ▼ -73.2% |
| 1999 | 0.64x | $150.80 Million | $236.30 Million | ▲ +46.8% |
| 1998 | 0.43x | $79.00 Million | $181.70 Million | ▼ -31.2% |
| 1997 | 0.63x | $80.60 Million | $127.50 Million | ▲ +821.7% |
| 1996 | 0.07x | $6.90 Million | $100.60 Million | ▼ -88.9% |
| 1995 | 0.62x | $63.80 Million | $103.00 Million | ▲ +48.8% |
| 1994 | 0.42x | $40.80 Million | $98.00 Million | ▼ -34.0% |
| 1993 | 0.63x | $42.70 Million | $67.70 Million | ▼ -12.9% |
| 1992 | 0.72x | $26.00 Million | $35.90 Million | ▲ +168.8% |
| 1991 | 0.27x | $5.20 Million | $19.30 Million | ▼ -61.5% |
| 1990 | 0.70x | $10.00 Million | $14.30 Million | — |