Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co (GT) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co (GT) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.05x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-718.00 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($15.29 Billion) in one year. See Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co free cash flow efficiency to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1989–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co across 37 annual periods. Also explore Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co (GT) equity growth momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co (1989–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see market value of Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.05x | $796.00 Million | $14.80 Billion | ▲ +23.7% |
| 2024 | 0.04x | $698.00 Million | $16.06 Billion | ▼ -29.5% |
| 2023 | 0.06x | $1.03 Billion | $16.75 Billion | ▲ +100.7% |
| 2022 | 0.03x | $521.00 Million | $16.96 Billion | ▼ -53.1% |
| 2021 | 0.07x | $1.06 Billion | $16.22 Billion | ▼ -22.2% |
| 2020 | 0.08x | $1.11 Billion | $13.25 Billion | ▼ -11.9% |
| 2019 | 0.10x | $1.21 Billion | $12.64 Billion | ▲ +23.0% |
| 2018 | 0.08x | $916.00 Million | $11.80 Billion | ▼ -18.1% |
| 2017 | 0.09x | $1.16 Billion | $12.21 Billion | ▼ -25.7% |
| 2016 | 0.13x | $1.50 Billion | $11.79 Billion | ▼ -7.0% |
| 2015 | 0.14x | $1.69 Billion | $12.30 Billion | ▲ +475.5% |
| 2014 | 0.02x | $340.00 Million | $14.26 Billion | ▼ -60.2% |
| 2013 | 0.06x | $938.00 Million | $15.66 Billion | ▼ -5.7% |
| 2012 | 0.06x | $1.04 Billion | $16.35 Billion | ▲ +36.5% |
| 2011 | 0.05x | $773.00 Million | $16.61 Billion | ▼ -28.9% |
| 2010 | 0.07x | $924.00 Million | $14.12 Billion | ▼ -32.3% |
| 2009 | 0.10x | $1.30 Billion | $13.42 Billion | ▲ +273.2% |
| 2008 | -0.06x | $-745.00 Million | $13.35 Billion | ▼ -663.7% |
| 2007 | 0.01x | $132.00 Million | $13.34 Billion | ▼ -70.1% |
| 2006 | 0.03x | $560.00 Million | $16.91 Billion | ▼ -44.8% |
| 2005 | 0.06x | $885.00 Million | $14.76 Billion | ▲ +30.0% |
| 2004 | 0.05x | $719.80 Million | $15.61 Billion | ▲ +313.3% |
| 2003 | -0.02x | $-306.70 Million | $14.19 Billion | ▼ -137.6% |
| 2002 | 0.06x | $676.40 Million | $11.76 Billion | ▼ -55.2% |
| 2001 | 0.13x | $1.27 Billion | $9.86 Billion | ▲ +132.3% |
| 2000 | 0.06x | $509.80 Million | $9.22 Billion | ▼ -25.1% |
| 1999 | 0.07x | $634.70 Million | $8.59 Billion | ▲ +10.7% |
| 1998 | 0.07x | $439.10 Million | $6.58 Billion | ▼ -60.9% |
| 1997 | 0.17x | $1.07 Billion | $6.27 Billion | ▲ +16.8% |
| 1996 | 0.15x | $897.50 Million | $6.15 Billion | ▲ +41.8% |
| 1995 | 0.10x | $652.80 Million | $6.34 Billion | ▼ -16.9% |
| 1994 | 0.12x | $764.60 Million | $6.18 Billion | ▲ +5.9% |
| 1993 | 0.12x | $703.10 Million | $6.01 Billion | ▲ +23.3% |
| 1992 | 0.09x | $616.80 Million | $6.51 Billion | ▼ -6.2% |
| 1991 | 0.10x | $572.40 Million | $5.66 Billion | ▲ +18.9% |
| 1990 | 0.09x | $574.30 Million | $6.75 Billion | ▼ -35.4% |
| 1989 | 0.13x | $817.80 Million | $6.21 Billion | — |