Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co (GT) — Strategic Asset Allocation Index
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co (GT) has a Strategic Asset Allocation Index of 175.9% as of June 2023. Strategic assets (PP&E of $9.28 Billion plus long-term investments of $-) total $9.28 Billion, measured against net assets of $5.27 Billion. A higher index reflects capital-intensive or investment-heavy strategies where strategic assets dominate the equity base. See GT net asset quality index to measure how much of total assets are equity-financed.
SAAI
Strategic Assets
PP&E
Net Assets
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co Strategic Asset Allocation Index (2000–2022)
This chart shows how Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co's Strategic Asset Allocation Index has evolved across 23 annual periods from 2000 to 2022. As of June 2023, the index stands at 175.9%, representing strategic assets of $9.28 Billion against net assets of $5.27 Billion USD. For live market cap and overall valuation, see Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co (GT) total market value.
Annual Strategic Asset Allocation Index for Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co (2000–2022)
The table below presents the year-by-year Strategic Asset Allocation Index for Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co from 2000 to 2022, covering 23 annual filings. Each row shows PP&E, long-term investments, strategic assets combined, net assets, the index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. See GT net assets for net asset value and shareholders' equity analysis.
| Year | SAAI | Strategic Assets (USD) | PP&E | LT Investments | Net Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 169.6% | $9.27 Billion | $9.27 Billion | $- | $5.47 Billion | ▼ -10.3 pp |
| 2021 | 179.9% | $9.33 Billion | $9.33 Billion | $- | $5.18 Billion | ▼ -63.2 pp |
| 2020 | 243.1% | $7.92 Billion | $7.92 Billion | $- | $3.26 Billion | ▲ +60.0 pp |
| 2019 | 183.2% | $8.32 Billion | $8.06 Billion | $262.00 Million | $4.54 Billion | ▲ +34.7 pp |
| 2018 | 148.5% | $7.53 Billion | $7.26 Billion | $270.00 Million | $5.07 Billion | ▼ -5.1 pp |
| 2017 | 153.6% | $7.45 Billion | $7.45 Billion | $- | $4.85 Billion | ▲ +4.6 pp |
| 2016 | 149.0% | $7.04 Billion | $7.04 Billion | $- | $4.72 Billion | ▼ -14.6 pp |
| 2015 | 163.6% | $6.78 Billion | $6.78 Billion | $- | $4.14 Billion | ▼ -23.7 pp |
| 2014 | 187.4% | $7.20 Billion | $7.15 Billion | $51.00 Million | $3.85 Billion | ▼ -204.5 pp |
| 2013 | 391.9% | $7.32 Billion | $7.32 Billion | $- | $1.87 Billion | ▼ -721.1 pp |
| 2012 | 1113.0% | $6.96 Billion | $6.96 Billion | $- | $625.00 Million | ▲ +486.1 pp |
| 2011 | 626.8% | $6.38 Billion | $6.38 Billion | $- | $1.02 Billion | ▲ +217.2 pp |
| 2010 | 409.6% | $6.17 Billion | $6.17 Billion | $- | $1.50 Billion | ▼ -183.0 pp |
| 2009 | 592.6% | $5.84 Billion | $5.84 Billion | $- | $986.00 Million | ▲ +291.6 pp |
| 2008 | 301.0% | $5.63 Billion | $5.63 Billion | $- | $1.87 Billion | ▲ +155.7 pp |
| 2007 | 145.3% | $5.60 Billion | $5.60 Billion | $- | $3.85 Billion | ▼ -4373.2 pp |
| 2006 | 4518.5% | $5.38 Billion | $5.38 Billion | $- | $119.00 Million | ▲ +3919.1 pp |
| 2005 | 599.4% | $5.18 Billion | $5.18 Billion | $- | $864.00 Million | ▲ +5.8 pp |
| 2004 | 593.7% | $5.46 Billion | $5.46 Billion | $- | $918.90 Million | ▼ -47.1 pp |
| 2003 | 640.8% | $5.21 Billion | $5.21 Billion | $- | $812.60 Million | ▲ +267.5 pp |
| 2002 | 373.3% | $5.19 Billion | $5.19 Billion | $- | $1.39 Billion | ▲ +233.2 pp |
| 2001 | 140.1% | $5.12 Billion | $5.12 Billion | $- | $3.65 Billion | ▲ +13.1 pp |
| 2000 | 127.0% | $5.52 Billion | $5.52 Billion | $- | $4.35 Billion | — |