Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co (GT) — Strategic Asset Allocation Index
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co (GT) has a Strategic Asset Allocation Index of 175.9% as of June 2023. Strategic assets (PP&E of $9.28 Billion plus long-term investments of $-) total $9.28 Billion, measured against net assets of $5.27 Billion. A higher index reflects capital-intensive or investment-heavy strategies where strategic assets dominate the equity base. Check Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co (GT) liquid assets ratio to evaluate the company's liquid asset resilience ratio.
SAAI
Strategic Assets
PP&E
Net Assets
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co Strategic Asset Allocation Index (2000–2022)
This chart shows how Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co's Strategic Asset Allocation Index has evolved across 23 annual periods from 2000 to 2022. As of June 2023, the index stands at 175.9%, representing strategic assets of $9.28 Billion against net assets of $5.27 Billion USD. See Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co free cash flow to debt ratio to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
Annual Strategic Asset Allocation Index for Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co (2000–2022)
The table below presents the year-by-year Strategic Asset Allocation Index for Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co from 2000 to 2022, covering 23 annual filings. Each row shows PP&E, long-term investments, strategic assets combined, net assets, the index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For the full company profile including market capitalisation, see GT market cap overview.
| Year | SAAI | Strategic Assets (USD) | PP&E | LT Investments | Net Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 169.6% | $9.27 Billion | $9.27 Billion | $- | $5.47 Billion | ▼ -10.3 pp |
| 2021 | 179.9% | $9.33 Billion | $9.33 Billion | $- | $5.18 Billion | ▼ -63.2 pp |
| 2020 | 243.1% | $7.92 Billion | $7.92 Billion | $- | $3.26 Billion | ▲ +60.0 pp |
| 2019 | 183.2% | $8.32 Billion | $8.06 Billion | $262.00 Million | $4.54 Billion | ▲ +34.7 pp |
| 2018 | 148.5% | $7.53 Billion | $7.26 Billion | $270.00 Million | $5.07 Billion | ▼ -5.1 pp |
| 2017 | 153.6% | $7.45 Billion | $7.45 Billion | $- | $4.85 Billion | ▲ +4.6 pp |
| 2016 | 149.0% | $7.04 Billion | $7.04 Billion | $- | $4.72 Billion | ▼ -14.6 pp |
| 2015 | 163.6% | $6.78 Billion | $6.78 Billion | $- | $4.14 Billion | ▼ -23.7 pp |
| 2014 | 187.4% | $7.20 Billion | $7.15 Billion | $51.00 Million | $3.85 Billion | ▼ -204.5 pp |
| 2013 | 391.9% | $7.32 Billion | $7.32 Billion | $- | $1.87 Billion | ▼ -721.1 pp |
| 2012 | 1113.0% | $6.96 Billion | $6.96 Billion | $- | $625.00 Million | ▲ +486.1 pp |
| 2011 | 626.8% | $6.38 Billion | $6.38 Billion | $- | $1.02 Billion | ▲ +217.2 pp |
| 2010 | 409.6% | $6.17 Billion | $6.17 Billion | $- | $1.50 Billion | ▼ -183.0 pp |
| 2009 | 592.6% | $5.84 Billion | $5.84 Billion | $- | $986.00 Million | ▲ +291.6 pp |
| 2008 | 301.0% | $5.63 Billion | $5.63 Billion | $- | $1.87 Billion | ▲ +155.7 pp |
| 2007 | 145.3% | $5.60 Billion | $5.60 Billion | $- | $3.85 Billion | ▼ -4373.2 pp |
| 2006 | 4518.5% | $5.38 Billion | $5.38 Billion | $- | $119.00 Million | ▲ +3919.1 pp |
| 2005 | 599.4% | $5.18 Billion | $5.18 Billion | $- | $864.00 Million | ▲ +5.8 pp |
| 2004 | 593.7% | $5.46 Billion | $5.46 Billion | $- | $918.90 Million | ▼ -47.1 pp |
| 2003 | 640.8% | $5.21 Billion | $5.21 Billion | $- | $812.60 Million | ▲ +267.5 pp |
| 2002 | 373.3% | $5.19 Billion | $5.19 Billion | $- | $1.39 Billion | ▲ +233.2 pp |
| 2001 | 140.1% | $5.12 Billion | $5.12 Billion | $- | $3.65 Billion | ▲ +13.1 pp |
| 2000 | 127.0% | $5.52 Billion | $5.52 Billion | $- | $4.35 Billion | — |