Good Times Restaurants Inc (GTIM) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Good Times Restaurants Inc (GTIM) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.03x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $1.42 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($48.49 Million) in one year. See how much free cash does Good Times Restaurants Inc generate to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Good Times Restaurants Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1991–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Good Times Restaurants Inc across 34 annual periods. Also explore Good Times Restaurants Inc equity growth rate to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Good Times Restaurants Inc (1991–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Good Times Restaurants Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Good Times Restaurants Inc stock valuation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.03x | $1.61 Million | $50.00 Million | ▼ -66.0% |
| 2024 | 0.09x | $5.13 Million | $54.03 Million | ▼ -30.7% |
| 2023 | 0.14x | $7.96 Million | $58.09 Million | ▲ +51.8% |
| 2022 | 0.09x | $5.29 Million | $58.60 Million | ▼ -38.0% |
| 2021 | 0.15x | $9.14 Million | $62.81 Million | ▲ +47.4% |
| 2020 | 0.10x | $8.37 Million | $84.71 Million | ▼ -54.8% |
| 2019 | 0.22x | $6.77 Million | $30.98 Million | ▼ -20.3% |
| 2018 | 0.27x | $6.50 Million | $23.73 Million | ▼ -1.7% |
| 2017 | 0.28x | $4.98 Million | $17.87 Million | ▼ -53.1% |
| 2016 | 0.59x | $5.40 Million | $9.08 Million | ▲ +87.1% |
| 2015 | 0.32x | $3.17 Million | $9.97 Million | ▼ -21.3% |
| 2014 | 0.40x | $1.44 Million | $3.56 Million | ▲ +46.7% |
| 2013 | 0.28x | $703.00K | $2.55 Million | ▲ +4855.6% |
| 2012 | -0.01x | $-22.00K | $3.80 Million | ▲ +95.2% |
| 2011 | -0.12x | $-539.00K | $4.48 Million | ▼ -8.2% |
| 2010 | -0.11x | $-737.00K | $6.62 Million | ▼ -9.9% |
| 2009 | -0.10x | $-595.00K | $5.88 Million | ▼ -197.0% |
| 2008 | 0.10x | $619.00K | $5.93 Million | ▼ -73.6% |
| 2007 | 0.40x | $1.76 Million | $4.46 Million | ▲ +3.7% |
| 2006 | 0.38x | $1.45 Million | $3.82 Million | ▲ +60.9% |
| 2005 | 0.24x | $666.00K | $2.81 Million | ▲ +59.7% |
| 2004 | 0.15x | $471.00K | $3.18 Million | ▼ -39.4% |
| 2003 | 0.24x | $707.00K | $2.89 Million | ▼ -16.8% |
| 2002 | 0.29x | $1.16 Million | $3.93 Million | ▼ -4.1% |
| 2001 | 0.31x | $1.35 Million | $4.40 Million | ▼ -9.3% |
| 2000 | 0.34x | $1.23 Million | $3.65 Million | ▼ -12.7% |
| 1999 | 0.39x | $1.20 Million | $3.10 Million | ▲ +132.3% |
| 1998 | 0.17x | $400.00K | $2.40 Million | ▲ +146.3% |
| 1996 | -0.36x | $-900.00K | $2.50 Million | ▼ -87.2% |
| 1995 | -0.19x | $-500.00K | $2.60 Million | ▼ -173.4% |
| 1994 | 0.26x | $1.10 Million | $4.20 Million | ▲ +532.1% |
| 1993 | -0.06x | $-200.00K | $3.30 Million | ▼ -275.8% |
| 1992 | 0.03x | $100.00K | $2.90 Million | ▲ +110.3% |
| 1991 | -0.33x | $-200.00K | $600.00K | — |