Good Times Restaurants Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Good Times Restaurants Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Good Times Restaurants Inc (GTIM) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.04x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $1.76 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($44.05 Million) in one year. Check GTIM capex plus investments ratio to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Good Times Restaurants Inc (1991–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Good Times Restaurants Inc from 1991 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Good Times Restaurants Inc across 34 annual periods. Check Good Times Restaurants Inc cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
Good Times Restaurants Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1991–2025)
Good Times Restaurants Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1991 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Good Times Restaurants Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see GTIM cash flow conversion.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.03x | $1.61 Million | $50.00 Million | ▼ -66.0% |
| 2024 | 0.09x | $5.13 Million | $54.03 Million | ▼ -30.7% |
| 2023 | 0.14x | $7.96 Million | $58.09 Million | ▲ +51.8% |
| 2022 | 0.09x | $5.29 Million | $58.60 Million | ▼ -38.0% |
| 2021 | 0.15x | $9.14 Million | $62.81 Million | ▲ +47.4% |
| 2020 | 0.10x | $8.37 Million | $84.71 Million | ▼ -54.8% |
| 2019 | 0.22x | $6.77 Million | $30.98 Million | ▼ -20.3% |
| 2018 | 0.27x | $6.50 Million | $23.73 Million | ▼ -1.7% |
| 2017 | 0.28x | $4.98 Million | $17.87 Million | ▼ -53.1% |
| 2016 | 0.59x | $5.40 Million | $9.08 Million | ▲ +87.1% |
| 2015 | 0.32x | $3.17 Million | $9.97 Million | ▼ -21.3% |
| 2014 | 0.40x | $1.44 Million | $3.56 Million | ▲ +46.7% |
| 2013 | 0.28x | $703.00K | $2.55 Million | ▲ +4855.6% |
| 2012 | -0.01x | $-22.00K | $3.80 Million | ▲ +95.2% |
| 2011 | -0.12x | $-539.00K | $4.48 Million | ▼ -8.2% |
| 2010 | -0.11x | $-737.00K | $6.62 Million | ▼ -9.9% |
| 2009 | -0.10x | $-595.00K | $5.88 Million | ▼ -197.0% |
| 2008 | 0.10x | $619.00K | $5.93 Million | ▼ -73.6% |
| 2007 | 0.40x | $1.76 Million | $4.46 Million | ▲ +3.7% |
| 2006 | 0.38x | $1.45 Million | $3.82 Million | ▲ +60.9% |
| 2005 | 0.24x | $666.00K | $2.81 Million | ▲ +59.7% |
| 2004 | 0.15x | $471.00K | $3.18 Million | ▼ -39.4% |
| 2003 | 0.24x | $707.00K | $2.89 Million | ▼ -16.8% |
| 2002 | 0.29x | $1.16 Million | $3.93 Million | ▼ -4.1% |
| 2001 | 0.31x | $1.35 Million | $4.40 Million | ▼ -9.3% |
| 2000 | 0.34x | $1.23 Million | $3.65 Million | ▼ -12.7% |
| 1999 | 0.39x | $1.20 Million | $3.10 Million | ▲ +132.3% |
| 1998 | 0.17x | $400.00K | $2.40 Million | ▲ +146.3% |
| 1996 | -0.36x | $-900.00K | $2.50 Million | ▼ -87.2% |
| 1995 | -0.19x | $-500.00K | $2.60 Million | ▼ -173.4% |
| 1994 | 0.26x | $1.10 Million | $4.20 Million | ▲ +532.1% |
| 1993 | -0.06x | $-200.00K | $3.30 Million | ▼ -275.8% |
| 1992 | 0.03x | $100.00K | $2.90 Million | ▲ +110.3% |
| 1991 | -0.33x | $-200.00K | $600.00K | — |