Good Times Restaurants Inc (GTIM) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Good Times Restaurants Inc (GTIM) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.01x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $513.00K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($46.85 Million) in one year. See how financially flexible is Good Times Restaurants Inc to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Good Times Restaurants Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1991–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Good Times Restaurants Inc across 34 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Good Times Restaurants Inc (GTIM) cash conversion ratio.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Good Times Restaurants Inc (1991–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Good Times Restaurants Inc. Check Good Times Restaurants Inc cash earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.03x | $1.61 Million | $50.00 Million | ▼ -66.0% |
| 2024 | 0.09x | $5.13 Million | $54.03 Million | ▼ -30.7% |
| 2023 | 0.14x | $7.96 Million | $58.09 Million | ▲ +51.8% |
| 2022 | 0.09x | $5.29 Million | $58.60 Million | ▼ -38.0% |
| 2021 | 0.15x | $9.14 Million | $62.81 Million | ▲ +47.4% |
| 2020 | 0.10x | $8.37 Million | $84.71 Million | ▼ -54.8% |
| 2019 | 0.22x | $6.77 Million | $30.98 Million | ▼ -20.3% |
| 2018 | 0.27x | $6.50 Million | $23.73 Million | ▼ -1.7% |
| 2017 | 0.28x | $4.98 Million | $17.87 Million | ▼ -53.1% |
| 2016 | 0.59x | $5.40 Million | $9.08 Million | ▲ +87.1% |
| 2015 | 0.32x | $3.17 Million | $9.97 Million | ▼ -21.3% |
| 2014 | 0.40x | $1.44 Million | $3.56 Million | ▲ +46.7% |
| 2013 | 0.28x | $703.00K | $2.55 Million | ▲ +4855.6% |
| 2012 | -0.01x | $-22.00K | $3.80 Million | ▲ +95.2% |
| 2011 | -0.12x | $-539.00K | $4.48 Million | ▼ -8.2% |
| 2010 | -0.11x | $-737.00K | $6.62 Million | ▼ -9.9% |
| 2009 | -0.10x | $-595.00K | $5.88 Million | ▼ -197.0% |
| 2008 | 0.10x | $619.00K | $5.93 Million | ▼ -73.6% |
| 2007 | 0.40x | $1.76 Million | $4.46 Million | ▲ +3.7% |
| 2006 | 0.38x | $1.45 Million | $3.82 Million | ▲ +60.9% |
| 2005 | 0.24x | $666.00K | $2.81 Million | ▲ +59.7% |
| 2004 | 0.15x | $471.00K | $3.18 Million | ▼ -39.4% |
| 2003 | 0.24x | $707.00K | $2.89 Million | ▼ -16.8% |
| 2002 | 0.29x | $1.16 Million | $3.93 Million | ▼ -4.1% |
| 2001 | 0.31x | $1.35 Million | $4.40 Million | ▼ -9.3% |
| 2000 | 0.34x | $1.23 Million | $3.65 Million | ▼ -12.7% |
| 1999 | 0.39x | $1.20 Million | $3.10 Million | ▲ +132.3% |
| 1998 | 0.17x | $400.00K | $2.40 Million | ▲ +146.3% |
| 1996 | -0.36x | $-900.00K | $2.50 Million | ▼ -87.2% |
| 1995 | -0.19x | $-500.00K | $2.60 Million | ▼ -173.4% |
| 1994 | 0.26x | $1.10 Million | $4.20 Million | ▲ +532.1% |
| 1993 | -0.06x | $-200.00K | $3.30 Million | ▼ -275.8% |
| 1992 | 0.03x | $100.00K | $2.90 Million | ▲ +110.3% |
| 1991 | -0.33x | $-200.00K | $600.00K | — |